Jump to content

Eden Hazard


the wes
 Share

Recommended Posts

Because the conduct was of a violent nature?

--

I really don't see how anyone's surprised by this or not even accepting of this. Hazard made a stupid decision, imo the punishment will fit the crime.

Yes I agree he made a stupid decision (I have been discussing this over 3 days now), but isnt a 3 match ban enough???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because the conduct was of a violent nature?

--

I really don't see how anyone's surprised by this or not even accepting of this. Hazard made a stupid decision, imo the punishment will fit the crime.

You don't see how anyone is surprised Hazard gets charged for toe-poeking the ball from under that 18 year old man lying on the ball? Sod off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes I agree he made a stupid decision (I have been discussing this over 3 days now), but isnt a 3 match ban enough???

They're under pressure from a lot of sources to make that decision. I don't agree, but it is logical.

You don't see how anyone is surprised Hazard gets charged for toe-poeking the ball from under that 18 year old man lying on the ball? Sod off.

Because the boy isn't a professional footballer making ridiculous amount of money per week. He isn't part of the game, and even though he was wrong to be covering the ball, Hazard doesn't have the right to take matters into his own hands. He may have kicked the ball, but the nature of kicking it when the boy was on the ground equates to violent conduct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because the boy isn't a professional footballer making ridiculous amount of money per week. He isn't part of the game, and even though he was wrong to be covering the ball, Hazard doesn't have the right to take matters into his own hands. He may have kicked the ball, but the nature of kicking it when the boy was on the ground equates to violent conduct.

No the boy man drives around in an Audi, is about to inherit a fortune and denied 10-13yo kids who'd kill to be ball boy the chance to be there instead because dad is the director of Swansea. He said on twitter he was gonna waste time; how can you not see he's a spoiled brat who tricked Hazard to get into this situation? Are you daft?

And if you find that little poke to get the ball 'taking matters in to your own hands' .. well, let's just say you should probably find another sport to follow. Where are the days football was a man's game?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No the boy man drives around in an Audi, is about to inherit a fortune and denied 10-13yo kids who'd kill to be ball boy the chance to be there instead because dad is the director of Swansea. He said on twitter he was gonna waste time; how can you not see he's a spoiled brat who tricked Hazard to get into this situation? Are you daft?

And if you find that little poke to get the ball 'taking matters in to your own hands' .. well, let's just say you should probably find another sport to follow. Where are the days football was a man's game?

Lol what? where did you hear all that? :blink:

Even though his intention was to entice Hazard into that situation it doesn't change the fact that Hazard allowed himself to get into that. The assistant referee should've been left to deal with it, not Hazard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol what? where did you hear all that? :blink:

Even though his intention was to entice Hazard into that situation it doesn't change the fact that Hazard allowed himself to get into that. The assistant referee should've been left to deal with it, not Hazard.

It's all over the internet mate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's all over the internet mate.

Even if that's true - which I have major doubts over - it doesn't change the fact Hazard was in the wrong. The ball-boy was also, but Hazard must be prepared to accept the consequences. The FA will obviously make an example of Hazard, that's wrong, but it's logical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No the boy man drives around in an Audi, is about to inherit a fortune and denied 10-13yo kids who'd kill to be ball boy the chance to be there instead because dad is the director of Swansea. He said on twitter he was gonna waste time; how can you not see he's a spoiled brat who tricked Hazard to get into this situation? Are you daft?

And if you find that little poke to get the ball 'taking matters in to your own hands' .. well, let's just say you should probably find another sport to follow. Where are the days football was a man's game?

The faggot is a twat, but I cant see how him beign rich affect anything. Also, he was covering for a boy who wouldnt be able to come because of the snow (if we are to believe in the internet).

All I am saying is that it is ridiculous for people to start judging him because he is a millionaire. The things he did are disgusting him being poor or not...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if that's true - which I have major doubts over - it doesn't change the fact Hazard was in the wrong. The ball-boy was also, but Hazard must be prepared to accept the consequences. The FA will obviously make an example of Hazard, that's wrong, but it's logical.

the F A and logic in the same sentence .... you must be a genius...or their spin doctor

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if that's true - which I have major doubts over - it doesn't change the fact Hazard was in the wrong. The ball-boy was also, but Hazard must be prepared to accept the consequences. The FA will obviously make an example of Hazard, that's wrong, but it's logical.

Major doubts? Might wanna actually read the thread you're posting in mate, it's filled with links and information.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really do despair of our Football Association. (And the media in England too. Nile Ranger is arrested on suspicion of rape and it is hardly seen in the news, Hazard accidently kicks a little cunt and its all over the news)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You