Jump to content
Join Talk Chelsea and log in to join the CFC discussion! ×

Eden Hazard

the wes

By the wes,
in Midfielders

 Share

Recommended Posts

laura90

laura90 556

Posted
Posted
Why Eden didn't just elbow him while he was still standing? Kick him not just the ball. Maybe punishment would be more appropriate in that case.

The English FA is a dirty and filthy bunch.

They sure enjoy the huge amount collected from Chelsea players as fines for every little incident. Feck! Hazard can only be subjected to further blame and punishment by a very biased opinion.

I didnt rule out the FA sticking out their ugly heads on Hazard , but its kinda surprising given that the there is naked for all to see.

Its so annoying that those who are suppose to look into pricks tweet have decided to turn their blind eyes because its Chelsea. They were busy keeping an eye on Ashleys tweets I suppose. The ball boy got thumbs up for his actions.

There is no reson to be suprised, the English Fa is run by the Manures. What a joke!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 31.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

sutro
sutro

My son with Eden today [emoji7]

Spike
Spike

I hate Eden Hazard because he hasn't already scored 200 goals for Chelsea and he because was bought for £32 million and because other people like him and because other people hate him and because he h

xPetrCechx
xPetrCechx

Posted Images

teignman

teignman 441

Posted
Posted
Thats a serious rambling there. What is the crime exactly you are referring to? He did not hit anyone. I do not accept this. It is simply bullshit. When ethics are concerned, this is my field. Sorry to bring this up but I teach this at the university. You can condone people because of a number of reasons: 1. Deontological: did he break an a actual rule - moral or legal. Actually no, when you see the footage. Is there a deontological code broken in his action. No, there is no stipulation of this fact. Consider what Cantona would be liable for in this case .... 2. Consequentionalism: Is there damage done, in hindsight. No. There is nothing there. 3. Virtue ethics: is Hazard someone who promotes the wrong values, does he do stuff that make football look bad. The proof of the pudding is in the eating here: nobody seems to think so, even our opponents. The only value that is being promoted here is that it is actually ok to have ball boys have an effect on the game. Not to even mention the fact of the twitter account or the fact that the ball boysfather has a serious interest in Swansea's performance. 4. Utilitarian (think Jeremy Bentham): what kind of 'utlity ' or good did Hazard prevent from beng the case. None. We lost, even with acions. Conclusion: all the debate is an emotivism debate (Richard Hare if people wanna know/research). It is about what we feel, especially the FA. Not about the question at hand. I am seriously disgusted because of the intellectuall stupidity of what i going on... Also and in addition: an argument that involves our 'pr' or our image is the worst. This is merely big brother level and deserves to be burned , nothing more. Fuck off FA. I will love Chelsea forever. Period.

I just wish I could hit the "like this" button more than once after reading your post. It's writing like this that truly enriches this forum: intelligent, relevant, and passionate. Well done sir.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Superblue

Superblue 6,331

Posted
Posted

No. There's a slight difference. Hazard received a red card for this while Terry didn't for his case. This charge is not about the 3-match ban, it's about the possibility of extending it further. So, right now, Hazard will serve the 3-match ban starting from this Sunday no matter what. Remains to be seen whether he will serve more than a 3-match ban(likely to).

But surely Chelsea are given the opportunity to appeal against it?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
zolayes

zolayes 14,489

Posted
Posted
The FA have something ridiculous like a 99.5% success rate when faced with an appeal. They don't like to admit they're wrong, even if it's as clear as day.

BUt they always select a "COMPLETELY INDEPENDENT PANEL" so it must be fair mustn't it????????

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Laylabelle

Laylabelle 9,300

Posted
Posted

Four games..daft but guess gotta do something to shut the bloke up so he dont complain with his woe is me blahhhh.

He's an idoit probably felt he was gana be hailed as a hero but has been exposed to look a bit of a twat really..not really how it planned out Im sure....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You

Sure, let me in!
Enter