Jump to content

Roman Abramovich Thread


 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, ChelseaFanUK said:

If i woke up to the news Ratcliffe had took over, id not be shocked.  Timing of everything seems real convenient.   Hasnt he also met the CST already since Friday?

 

I still think it'll be Boehly, but the timing of Ratcliffe's bid, the bypassing of Raine, which would indicate a deal directly between him and Roman/the club; and the talks with buck and Uk govt already, [plus the fact he would pass due dilligence with the govt almost immediately] id suspect on paper, Roman prefers his offer.  And even though i still think Todd's group get it as said, I don't think it's quite cut and dried. 

Talk that he cannot progress his bid until Boehly's exclusivity expires makes no sense because 1. There is no exclusivity yet, I'm sure Matt Law would have reported that, seeing as he is in bed with one of Boehly's team, and 2. Roman CAN still reject the offer, this exclusivity period does not mean you absolutely have got the club signed, sealed and delivered

Thats just me speculating, though

A very interesting speculation though and with an air of plausibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Takeover thrown into doubt as Abramovich makes demand

The sanctioned Russian owner is looking for debt linked to the club's parent company to be paid to a Jersey-based firm, according to reports, just four days after Todd Boehly's consortium began exclusive takeover talks

https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/Chelsea-sale-roman-abramovich-debt-26862005

 

Roman Abramovich is considering a U-turn on his vow to write off Chelsea's £1.6bn debt as part of the club's sale, according to a report from The Times, despite the takeover appearing to be nearing a conclusion.

Club officials last week told the government that they they want to restructure the way the club is being sold, the report said, with a demand that the debt linked to parent company Fordstam is paid off to a Jersey-based company called Camberley International Investments.

Fordstam's latest accounts say that "Camberley International Investments Ltd provides funding to Fordstam Ltd and its subsidiaries as required to enable the Group to continue as a going concern." But it is unclear who has ultimate ownership of Camberley International Investments Ltd, a company established in August 2020.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This drawn-out saga is starting to do my head in. I hope when it is all over, and we finally have new owners confirmed, that the said owners ban all the putrid hacks from rags like the Daily Mail, Guardian and Daily Star from the Press box . They have done nothing but stick the boot in and plaster unfounded scare stories over their back pages, as if they are in the know....which they clearly arent

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Todd Boehly’s bid have been incredibly impressed with Thomas Tuchel, they will look to talk to him quickly and tell him their vision, it’s been a sticky patch of results but Tuchel has become Chelsea’s ambassador through all this and they’ve been hugely impressed. (Matt Law) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

UK government sanctions make it clear that Abramovich is effectively President Putin’s man. If you believe that, then, in essence, Chelsea is a Russian state asset.  Vladimir Putin, currently talking up the threat of nuclear war, is he really going to allow £2.5billion of Russian assets vanish into the hands of the UK Government to distribute as they see fit, with much of it ending up supporting Ukraine?

Niet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Norfolkblue1961 said:

This drawn-out saga is starting to do my head in. I hope when it is all over, and we finally have new owners confirmed, that the said owners ban all the putrid hacks from rags like the Daily Mail, Guardian and Daily Star from the Press box . They have done nothing but stick the boot in and plaster unfounded scare stories over their back pages, as if they are in the know....which they clearly arent

As much as it feels like it, the whole situation is actually moving at a rapid speed considering the figures involved.

If it was just left to develop and you had a handful of people 'in the know' reporting on developments there would be no problems.

Instead we have 90% of journalists either (a) using Roman's sanctions as a means of showing their true feelings about Chelsea, or (b) finding the worst case scenarios and creating a doomsday portrayal of the situation.

Given the platform they are on and the audience size, one of the worst has to be Sky Sports. It's bad enough that if we want to watch a Premier League football match on their channel, we have to suffer through what is best described as a Liverpool lovefest. But you then have that Kaveh bloke fuelling all sorts of speculation for clickbait on their platforms. He's not a journalist, he literally spends half of the day on Twitter looking for football stories and transfer gossip (spoiler alert - we've worked out his trusted "source").

I remember years back Sky Sports used to be top tier for transfer news because they didn't lend themselves to speculation. In fact I can remember how gutted I was when they reported that Dani Alves was joining Chelsea from Sevilla only for it then to not materialise. In recent years they've effectively prostituted themselves out to the mass hysteria regarding transfer talk, culminating in them treating transfer deadline day like a religious festival. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Fulham Broadway said:

UK government sanctions make it clear that Abramovich is effectively President Putin’s man. If you believe that, then, in essence, Chelsea is a Russian state asset.  Vladimir Putin, currently talking up the threat of nuclear war, is he really going to allow £2.5billion of Russian assets vanish into the hands of the UK Government to distribute as they see fit, with much of it ending up supporting Ukraine?

Niet

Well, the UN then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I fail to understand why Ben Jacobs keeps forgetting the fact that Roman can reject Raine's choices, so to say Ratcliffe simply cant enter now due to Raine's process, is wrong.

 

Exclusivity still has not been signed since Friday when we are led to believe Boehly got preferred bidder... and even then, it does not mean its game over. 

 

Ratcliffe coming in has certainly caused a stir, and i think hed be Roman's choice.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You