Jump to content

Gaël Kakuta


PaulHopkins
 Share

Recommended Posts

He's good but he's not that good.

He has had a good start for Liverpool, but so did Papiss Cisse for Newcastle.

Cisse was in the form of his life and scored alot of flukes. Of course that half a season was unsustainable.

Sturridge is the much better footballer and far superior both physically and technically.

He had a exceptional record at Bolton and repeated the trick at Liverpool. You're selling him short mate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cisse was in the form of his life and scored alot of flukes. Of course that half a season was unsustainable.

Sturridge is the much better footballer and far superior both physically and technically.

He had a exceptional record at Bolton and repeated the trick at Liverpool. You're selling him short mate.

Ofcourse im not, i rate him highly but i highly doubt he will be one of the best ever PL forwards. I highly doubt he will reach the levels of Henry, Drogba, Bergkamp, RVN, Cantona, Zola etc.....

He could get to the second level where the likes of Hasselbaink, Owen (before he got fucked up by injuries) and there's no shame in that.

If there was belief he could reach the very top level, wouldn't a better side than Liverpool have snapped him up for such a low(ish) fee?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look at Sturridge goals to games record and come back to me with the pointless sarcasm.

Only thing that can stop Sturridge from reaching his potential are injuries.

Sturridge is an average player.

If you want world-class, look at Van Persie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be fair, RVP didn't begin to get "world class" status until he was 27/28. Sturridge is still 23 and has the potential to be world-class.

I disagree, but that's your opinion and I respect it!

When I look at Sturridge, I fail to see anything special. He has his positives but he is lazy and egotistical, and that will prevent him from becoming world class. Give me a work-horse like Shane Long over him any day - I think there is a reason the club let him go, and that's because the manager at the time didn't think much of Sturridge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree, but that's your opinion and I respect it!

When I look at Sturridge, I fail to see anything special. He has his positives but he is lazy and egotistical, and that will prevent him from becoming world class. Give me a work-horse like Shane Long over him any day - I think there is a reason the club let him go, and that's because the manager at the time didn't think much of Sturridge.

So? He went from being a bit part player at Chelsea (despite being one of our best players for half a season out of position in 2011/12 but people won't remember that) to being one of Liverpool's key players. To say he's average just sounds bitter to me, and to say that he's lazy and egotistical (don't know why people keep banging on about this) will prevent him from being world class is far fetched (he certainly works hard, to say he's lazy is just blind hate) - Ibrahimovic is perceived egotistical and lazy - doesn't mean he's not world class.

I'm not saying Sturridge will definitely be a world class striker but to say he doesn't have the potential to be there; you look at his attributes - he's tall, great speed, great feet, good technical ability, flair, an eye for goal - to say he's average is bewildering. Average players don't do what he's done in his so far short professional career. He's going to turn even more heads next season should he stay injury free, I firmly believe that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why was the only offer on the table from a mid-table side like Liverpool?

Mid table is harsh on Liverpool. He went there because they were one of the few decent clubs aspiring to challenge for Europe that would allow him to develop as a striker, and alas, he's hit the ground running there and is already a key player.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So why didn't AVB try and sign him? Why was the only offer on the table from a mid-table side like Liverpool?

will chelsea even sell to a local rival club? i doubt so.

whats more Spurs had defoe and adebayor. they weren't looking for a striker in sturridge's mould.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You