Popular Post! The Mak 4,459 Posted September 4, 2013 Popular Post! Share Posted September 4, 2013 Lukaku possesses a fearsome pace, physicality of any striker & great finishing touch,one of the best strikers to ever play at Chelsea.His ability tells me, he is one of the best I ever seen at Chelsea. Potential to be better than Drogba. I hope, you agree.Hasn't scored one goal at Chelsea = One of the best Chelsea strikers ever......? The Skipper, iceboy, edetarod and 3 others 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edenhazard17 281 Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 MOURINHO ON SUMMER MOVEShttp://www.chelseafc.com/news-article/article/3447451The manager was specifically referring to Moses and Lukaku, two he said the club would have been 'more than happy to keep' in this season's squad but decided with an eye on the long-term for both Chelsea and the two attackers, it is better for them to go on loan to Liverpool and Everton respectively.On the subject of gaining regular playing time, Mourinho said: 'It is important for Lukaku.'We have Samuel Eto'o, Fernando Torres and Demba Ba, and of course he would have had chances to play but another thing is to play basically every weekend.'He had [possible] clubs, he had options and he made that decision, I have to respect that decision and hopefully it goes well for him and it goes well for everyone.''It is time for every one of us to think about the competitions and to think about the improvement of our players, and to stop thinking about selling and buying and who is coming and who is leaving,' Mourinho told Chelsea TV following the end of the transfer window.Well said. hjperdeath, Mr_President, Barbara and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushman 2,043 Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 Hasn't scored one goal at Chelsea = One of the best Chelsea strikers ever......? A great future, for Lukaku lies ahead, potentially the best...? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushman 2,043 Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 You're wrong.Have you watched WBA matches last year?Or just because he talks big, you think he's a misunderstood talent.Ask yourself why if he's such a talent, why no big clubs don't try to have him?What clubs would not buy him ?Take your time to think it over. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GermanBlue 82 Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 A great future, for Lukaku lies ahead, potentially the best...?There's a difference between potential and reality. I agree that he could be one of the best strikers to ever play for Chelsea. No one knows that, but to say that now when he hasn't even scored for us is way too early. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jose M 140 Posted September 4, 2013 Author Share Posted September 4, 2013 According to Jos'e it was Lukaku and his representatives that wanted the move on loan so he could play minutes all season. Great move for his development. We have goals throughout whole team in Ivanovic,Lampard,Oscar,Eden and hopefully Eto. We hopefully wont miss him this season or it will be the 3rd season in a row we have loaned out a striker who has out scored our own. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Flash 1,144 Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 Yeah i heard Jose kind of imply on tv that it was Lukaku who wanted the loan? who knows Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NiclasCFC 2,582 Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 This cant be true....Romelu Lukaku on his move to Everton: "Eto'o joining us didn't influence my decision because I was already behind Fernando Torres in the pecking order anyway." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stingray 9,441 Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 the source of a lot of confusion: The opinion on the lukaku saga can differ if you adress 1) is it good for Lukaku 2) is it good for Chelsea now I say 1) yes I say 2) no, we weakened our attack (or narrowed down the options) I am frustrated as fuck a lot do not seem to discern between those two and then attack - including the 'belgian' remarks that have been going on repeat for weeks .... The only place to be and semiller1313 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jose M 140 Posted September 4, 2013 Author Share Posted September 4, 2013 Dont know if anyone has posted this yet:Mirallas: I was in Lukaku's room on Monday and only left when he was joining EvertonRead more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2410967/Evertons-Kevin-Mirallas-said-helped-Romelu-Lukaku-decide-join.html#ixzz2dvCCxhr8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BleedsBlue 1,549 Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 Lukaku never wanted a loan move as there was never any such option as he was guaranteed first team action by the manager.Unfortunately,we could not send Ba out so Jose chose to stick with the experience of Ba instead of Lukaku. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHOULO19 24,332 Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 This cant be true....Romelu Lukaku on his move to Everton: "Eto'o joining us didn't influence my decision because I was already behind Fernando Torres in the pecking order anyway."What can't be true? That Lukaku was behind Torres in the pecking order? I think that was pretty obvious in the first 4 games. Henrique and TorontoChelsea 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushman 2,043 Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 Pecking order here, Lukaku there...the kid was told by Jose. Listen boy, you are great, I am giving an opportunity to play, but at Everton. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nate91 36 Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 According to Jos'e it was Lukaku and his representatives that wanted the move on loan so he could play minutes all season. Great move for his development. We have goals throughout whole team in Ivanovic,Lampard,Oscar,Eden and hopefully Eto. We hopefully wont miss him this season or it will be the 3rd season in a row we have loaned out a striker who has out scored our own.Torres had more goals then Lukaku last year. Lukaku had more then Torres in the league. Either way Fernando is surely the better option for our team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnythefirst 1,076 Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 Torres had more goals then Lukaku last year. Lukaku had more then Torres in the league. Either way Fernando is surely the better option for our team.Since Lukaku only played in the league, you should only count Fernando's league goals. Which means 17 goals for Lukaku compared to 8 for Torres.Please be honest in your comparisons. ;-) semiller1313, yorkie and Stingray 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.