Jump to content

Romelu Lukaku


Jose M
 Share

Recommended Posts

32 minutes ago, Tomo said:

Havertz and Werner have a lot of uses despite their goal struggles. The former at false 9 facilitates us playing really enjoyable football and the latter causes teams headaches with his pace and pressing.

Lukaku is such a non entity in general play the only way he justifies his inclusion as an untouchable is with Messi and Ronaldo figures.

After dropping Lukaku for Liverpool  and having those clear the air talks with him,, I'd hoped that Tuchel had stamped his authority., and wouldn't be afraid to drop him in certain games as needed. Lukaku following his goofed up interview didn't have a leg to stand on.

Now it seems he's gone back to shoehorning him in every game., and Lukaku is back in favor. What gives?

Edited by Blue Armour
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Blue Armour said:

After dropping Lukaku for Liverpool  and having those clear the air talks with him,, I'd hoped that Tuchel had stamped his authority., and wouldn't be afraid to drop him in certain games as needed. Lukaku following his goofed up interview didn't have a leg to stand on.

Now it seems he's gone back to shoehorning him in every game., and Lukaku is back in favor. What gives?

I'm clinging onto the hope they've "made up" the same way Conte and Costa did and next season we can start afresh without this little brat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mário César said:

Vlahovic is early and you want Broja? Lol

Broja at the very least looks good in the Premier League. There is always the risk of buying STs from Italy or Germany. 

Other than Haaland, there really is no stand out ST atm. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9/10 strikers fail here bc we just are and never were an all out attacking team. Only absolute elite strikers or those with impenetrable confidence will prevail here. We can't attract players of this calibre anymore so we should just not spend much at this position. Just buy 4 wc wingbacks instead for all i care.

In my almost 20 years of watching Chelsea games, I would consider only hasselbaink, drogba, costa and giroud a success here. honorable mentions to Gudjohnsen, Crespo... all except maybe drogba at the time came at moderate prices.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Magic Lamps said:

9/10 strikers fail here bc we just are and never were an all out attacking team. Only absolute elite strikers or those with impenetrable confidence will prevail here. We can't attract players of this calibre anymore so we should just not spend much at this position. Just buy 4 wc wingbacks instead for all i care.

In my almost 20 years of watching Chelsea games, I would consider only hasselbaink, drogba, costa and giroud a success here. honorable mentions to Gudjohnsen, Crespo... all except maybe drogba at the time came at moderate prices.

£34.20m Costa

£34.65m (granted with inflation it is more) Drogba

 

I liked Crespo, deffo do not think he was a pure flop, just it never truly clicked, but his first year, if he had played a full EPL season, he was tracking to over 20 league goals (he had 10 league goals in only 19 games, in only 1100 minutes )

Breaking the Myth: Why Hernan Crespo Can't Be Considered a Chelsea Flop -  Sports IllustratedHernan Crespo reveals his Chelsea regret in honest interview - Read Chelsea

Edited by Vesper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Magic Lamps said:

9/10 strikers fail here bc we just are and never were an all out attacking team. Only absolute elite strikers or those with impenetrable confidence will prevail here. We can't attract players of this calibre anymore so we should just not spend much at this position. Just buy 4 wc wingbacks instead for all i care.

In my almost 20 years of watching Chelsea games, I would consider only hasselbaink, drogba, costa and giroud a success here. honorable mentions to Gudjohnsen, Crespo... all except maybe drogba at the time came at moderate prices.

I would add Anelka too. One of the few "non-targetman" strikers to succeed here in recent times.

Anelka at the age we got him played with a lot of intelligence. Scoring and assisting. 

That intelligence is lacking in a lot of our later big money striker signings.

Edited by Blue Armour
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Magic Lamps said:

9/10 strikers fail here bc we just are and never were an all out attacking team. Only absolute elite strikers or those with impenetrable confidence will prevail here. We can't attract players of this calibre anymore so we should just not spend much at this position. Just buy 4 wc wingbacks instead for all i care.

In my almost 20 years of watching Chelsea games, I would consider only hasselbaink, drogba, costa and giroud a success here. honorable mentions to Gudjohnsen, Crespo... all except maybe drogba at the time came at moderate prices.

Prime Eidur Gudjohnsen would be a dream in this system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You