Jump to content

Thibaut Courtois


Domino-
 Share

Recommended Posts

You've got to realise that Courtois is in a very strong bargaining position here.

I disagree. The way I see it, he signed a contract till 2016 and should he become a troublemaker Chelsea could easily destroy his development by letting him sit in the stands and train with the youth team for the remainder of his contract without letting him play a single first team match ever.There goes that national team place forever...

Of course that wouldn't be in anyone's best interest but it's ridiculous to say that Chelsea don't have a say in Courtois' future and that should the player decide it's better for him to continue his career in Spain permanently he could just play Chelsea for a fool and leave the club who took the risk of paying £8m for a 19-year-old unproven keeper for peanuts. He could easily have been just another Matej Delac, who Chelsea also paid a hefty sum for with nothing to show for it a few years later, but Courtois has proven to be well worth that money and his value has now multiplied. If he doesn't give a fuck about playing for Chelsea and isn't willing to work for his place (that means spending a year or two on loan at some club which he might not fancy as much as Atleti) and wants to leave to join Barcelona or Atletico, I'm sure Chelsea will have no problem with that as long as the price matches his value to Chelsea, which would be something around £25m in my opinion. I can't see anyone paying that much and Chelsea have absolutely no need of letting him join our European rivals Barcelona for anything below that. With Atletico a deal could probably be worked with Courtois joining Atletico in a part-exchange deal for Falcao, but that's a whole new story.

And yes, Atletico might be paying the player's wages now that everything has worked out brilliantly but had he been another Matej Delac they would simply have sent him back and we would have ended up with an expensive reserve keeper on hefty wages and absolutely zero market value. It was Chelsea who took the risk here and not Atletico, so he should show some fucking respect. Just to be clear, so far I haven't seen him say or do anything disrespectful towards Chelsea but this speculation started when someone said something along the lines of Courtois not owing us anything and that he should be let go if he prefers playing in Spain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's such a difficult decision and predicament, and one any club would kill to be in. However, as much as I love Petr with my heart, my head is telling me not to even risk losing Courtois. We should loan him out as long as time would allow, but there is no way we should risk losing out on him.

It might take him a season to adapt, but honestly, I wouldn't mind if it means we have a world class keeper for the next 15+ years, instead of 5+. Also, he's so tall, and not to mention confident, I can't see a De Gea situation at all. Besides from that, there's been situations this season where I thought Cech could've done a lot better. I sometimes feel that if we had the younger, hungrier keeper (like Cech himself once was), some goals could've been avoided.

We're in quite a privileged situation, going from one world class keeper to the next is rare, and we have a chance to do it 3 times on the trot: Cudicini - Cech - Courtios. (A thing for C's maybe?)

Don't forget, while Cech isn't as injury prone as Cudicini was, Cudicini wasn't far off Cech's age now when we decided to replace him; despite having fantastic season's previously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree. The way I see it, he signed a contract till 2016 and should he become a troublemaker Chelsea could easily destroy his development by letting him sit in the stands and train with the youth team for the remainder of his contract without letting him play a single first team match ever.There goes that national team place forever...

Of course that wouldn't be in anyone's best interest but it's ridiculous to say that Chelsea don't have a say in Courtois' future and that should the player decide it's better for him to continue his career in Spain permanently he could just play Chelsea for a fool and leave the club who took the risk of paying £8m for a 19-year-old unproven keeper for peanuts. He could easily have been just another Matej Delac, who Chelsea also paid a hefty sum for with nothing to show for it a few years later, but Courtois has proven to be well worth that money and his value has now multiplied. If he doesn't give a fuck about playing for Chelsea and isn't willing to work for his place (that means spending a year or two on loan at some club which he might not fancy as much as Atleti) and wants to leave to join Barcelona or Atletico, I'm sure Chelsea will have no problem with that as long as the price matches his value to Chelsea, which would be something around £25m in my opinion. I can't see anyone paying that much and Chelsea have absolutely no need of letting him join our European rivals Barcelona for anything below that. With Atletico a deal could probably be worked with Courtois joining Atletico in a part-exchange deal for Falcao, but that's a whole new story.

And yes, Atletico might be paying the player's wages now that everything has worked out brilliantly but had he been another Matej Delac they would simply have sent him back and we would have ended up with an expensive reserve keeper on hefty wages and absolutely zero market value. It was Chelsea who took the risk here and not Atletico, so he should show some fucking respect. Just to be clear, so far I haven't seen him say or do anything disrespectful towards Chelsea but this speculation started when someone said something along the lines of Courtois not owing us anything and that he should be let go if he prefers playing in Spain.

What risk on an unproven player? He's just won the player of the year award in a team that won a league title. It might not be in one of the finest leagues but doing that aged 18 is still a remarkable achievement. Don't make him into an unknown youth team player the scouting team picked up somewhere. His name and fame was widely known before he went to Chelsea and there were many potential suitors who were ready to take a 'risk' on him. Chelsea's involvement with Courtois' development and achievements has been very little indeed, unlike you're making out.

This isn't the eighties anymore where clubs can play despots and order players around. They're employees with rights and if Chelsea goes against the wishes of Courtois then that could make a very cloudy further working relationship. I wouldn't be surprised if Chelsea caved in and granted him an extra year at Atletico, if they'd still want him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What risk on an unproven player? He's just won the player of the year award in a team that won a league title. It might not be in one of the finest leagues but doing that aged 18 is still a remarkable achievement. Don't make him into an unknown youth team player the scouting team picked up somewhere. His name and fame was widely known before he went to Chelsea and there were many potential suitors who were ready to take a 'risk' on him. Chelsea's involvement with Courtois' development and achievements has been very little indeed, unlike you're making out.

This isn't the eighties anymore where clubs can play despots and order players around. They're employees with rights and if Chelsea goes against the wishes of Courtois then that could make a very cloudy further working relationship. I wouldn't be surprised if Chelsea caved in and granted him an extra year at Atletico, if they'd still want him.

As an unproven player I mean a guy who had only one season of professional football under his belt in a league which, with all due respect, is not even in the top10 of European football. £8m for a guy like that is a lot of money and Atletico aside, which clubs were willing to pay that much for him?

And where have I said that Chelsea have been largely involved with his development and achievements so far? I am merely stating the fact that Courtois is a player of Chelsea FC and he should act accordingly. So far he hasn't done anything to suggest otherwise and everything is just the normal media bullshit but soon there will be a point where Thibaut needs to make a decision. Will he fight to become Chelsea's number one keeper and be willing to leave the comfort of Spain or will he burn his bridges to everyone at Chelsea FC, club and fans included, to pursue his career elsewhere. All I'm saying is that option number two won't be easy for him and things will probably get ugly if he decides to go that way.

Personally I rate the guy to be one of the finest goalkeepers in the world already and think we should do everything in our power to keep him at Chelsea, including sacrificing Cech for Courtois within a few years, but Courtois himself needs to make some sacrifices too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As an unproven player I mean a guy who had only one season of professional football under his belt in a league which, with all due respect, is not even in the top10 of European football ...

Being ranked number 10 on the uefa club ranking counts as top 10 in my books.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's such a difficult decision and predicament, and one any club would kill to be in. However, as much as I love Petr with my heart, my head is telling me not to even risk losing Courtois. We should loan him out as long as time would allow, but there is no way we should risk losing out on him.

It might take him a season to adapt, but honestly, I wouldn't mind if it means we have a world class keeper for the next 15+ years, instead of 5+. Also, he's so tall, and not to mention confident, I can't see a De Gea situation at all. Besides from that, there's been situations this season where I thought Cech could've done a lot better. I sometimes feel that if we had the younger, hungrier keeper (like Cech himself once was), some goals could've been avoided.

We're in quite a privileged situation, going from one world class keeper to the next is rare, and we have a chance to do it 3 times on the trot: Cudicini - Cech - Courtios. (A thing for C's maybe?)

Don't forget, while Cech isn't as injury prone as Cudicini was, Cudicini wasn't far off Cech's age now when we decided to replace him; despite having fantastic season's previously.

You cannot disregard the fact that Thibaot might not want to play for Chelsea for 15 years. Maybe he doesnt want to stay in London. We dont know that. And if he doesnt, and honestly doesnt, we wont keep him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You cannot disregard the fact that Thibaot might not want to play for Chelsea for 15 years. Maybe he doesnt want to stay in London. We dont know that. And if he doesnt, and honestly doesnt, we wont keep him.

Sadly, that's also true mate. I would like to think we have a slight edge by having the likes of Hazard, KDB and Lukaku, but I'm not sure that would matter if the likes of Barca came knocking...at least we would quadruple our money though! I mean, if De Gea is worth near £20m, surely Courtois would be £25m+? I'd also like to think we wouldn't sell him on the cheap to Barca since they openly hate us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being ranked number 10 on the uefa club ranking counts as top 10 in my books.

That was hardly the point in my post and even if Belgium are ranked number ten that still doesn't change the fact that Courtois was very much unproven at the time he joined Chelsea.

But that's enough of that, no need arguing about this any further. Let's just wait and see what happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was hardly the point in my post and even if Belgium are ranked number ten that still doesn't change the fact that Courtois was very much unproven at the time he joined Chelsea.

But that's enough of that, no need arguing about this any further. Let's just wait and see what happens.

He was obviously refering to Atletico Madrid's ranking ;).

And he didn't make any point I see now since you were talking about the Belgian competition..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was obviously refering to Atletico Madrid's ranking ;).

And he didn't make any point I see now since you were talking about the Belgian competition..

No, I was not referring to Atletico's ranking, but the Belgian League (should have stated country ranking and not club ranking, so I stand corrected).

But I agree with pr22 that it doesn't make any sense arguing about this any further.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You