Jump to content

Thibaut Courtois


Domino-
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, OhForAGreavsie said:

All true but I hope it doesn't cost us £200,000 a week.

I really don't want to see us spending £10 million a year on a goalie when we so clearly could benefit from spending big in other areas. I'd have no problem with £300,000 per week for Eden but I think the difference in game by game results between a £120,000 per week goalie and a £200,000 per week one, are too marginal to be worth paying for. I think we gain more by spending an extra £80,000 per week to secure the right outfield player, than we lose by not spending it on a goalkeeper.

I like Thibaut. In terms of straight goalkeeping ability I fully supported the decision to choose him over Petr. Loosing him would be a major disappointment, but if that decision has to be made, it has to be made.

 

 Courtois is way more important to us than losing 80,000 pounds a week, keeping in mind how Emenalo will blow that money on some gash player. Just for 80000 you'd rather lose one of the best goalkeepers in the world to give Emenalo a prayer's chance to land a decent forward ? Look at that money wasted on Batshuayi. That's what'll happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nono said:

 

 Courtois is way more important to us than losing 80,000 pounds a week, keeping in mind how Emenalo will blow that money on some gash player. Just for 80000 you'd rather lose one of the best goalkeepers in the world to give Emenalo a prayer's chance to land a decent forward ? Look at that money wasted on Batshuayi. That's what'll happen.

To believe that money specifically will be wasted is to believe that all money will be wasted. In which case, three Thibauts ain't gonna help us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sir Mikel OBE said:

Why did the NBA playoffs have to start this week:(

 

He probably would have saved that first goal

Why was he even off to do an NBA commercial in the first place?! :rant:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jason said:

I first thought he was there on club business but then I thought to myself that sounds way too stupid. We won't be having our players doing physical activities for sponsorship during the crunch end of the season. Really baffling. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seesh....they should really ban these kinds of activities.

They make such a big fuss about players going on two-wheelers, and skiing on holiday...and then they go and schedule side activities like these during crunch time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, BlueLion. said:

He'd have saved Rashford's shot. Begovic is horrifically bad 1v1 or when closing down an angle. Goes to ground very, very early.

And I don't think it helps that he's been busy golfing with Terry on weekends in Portugal this season (according to people follow them on Instagram).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Special Juan said:

Wouldn't of made a difference anyway, he couldn't of covered for another 10 deficiencies like we saw.

I don't know, both goals were really soft in my opinion. Courtois saves the first one against Rashford and it could've been a wake up call. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You