Jump to content

Matthew Harding Stand

Opinions and analysis on tactics, players and off the field issues.


Subforums

  1. Chelsea Transfers   (15,260 visits to this link)

  2. Articles

    Read the latest Chelsea news and opinion from our main website.

    17.2k
    posts
  3. Transfer Archives

    Browse the old player transfer archives.

    142.1k
    posts

5,218 topics in this forum

  1. From: Fulham 2-2

    • 0 replies
    • 4.1k views
    • 0 replies
    • 135 views
  2. Chelsea eye striker deal 1 2

    • 19 replies
    • 1.8k views
    • 0 replies
    • 143 views
    • 0 replies
    • 143 views
  3. All i want for christmas

    • 4 replies
    • 1k views
  4. No more Mr nice guy

    • 2 replies
    • 866 views
  5. Show me the money

    • 0 replies
    • 961 views
  6. Scolari defends JT

    • 4 replies
    • 843 views
  7. No action against Alex

    • 1 reply
    • 1.5k views
    • 15 replies
    • 1.8k views
  8. Mancienne deal extended

    • 2 replies
    • 804 views
  9. Hold the cyanide......

    • 4 replies
    • 1.3k views
    • 7 replies
    • 1.7k views
  10. Who do you drop? 1 2

    • 35 replies
    • 7.4k views
  11. 15 Chelsea staff sacked !

    • 2 replies
    • 930 views
    • 0 replies
    • 1.5k views
    • 3 replies
    • 1.1k views
    • 14 replies
    • 2.4k views
  12. Frank: On Your Bike, Owen

    • 3 replies
    • 833 views
  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Latest Posts

    • Pretty sure it’s first dibs on the player at the amount that was in the contract, so if it’s 40m they can buy him back for 40 million
    • How does the buyback work though?    Let's say someone bids 60 million for Delap, do City still get to buy him back at 40 million or do they waive that right and get some sort of sell on clause instead?  Would make sense for City to just activate the clause and sell him to the highest bidder.   No wonder why they wanted that clause into O'Reilly's deal. 
    • Who is to say we didn't? A lot of our transfers aren't widely in the media until quite late. Additionally, Delap now vs the Summer is probably a very different proposition. Now, I reckon Ipswich would've asked for £100m+. They would have justified that by saying he is their best chance of staying in the league at that is worth £170m.  In the Summer, with Ipswich likely relegated they won't be able to demand the same. The only issue may be City's £40m buyback but with the way they spent in t
    • Now that Duran Duran has gone on tour to Saudi - Delap is the next best thing. He is an animal at pressing and gets in the right places.  Think him as a rotation to Jackson is what we need.  Really need to sort our CBs out and I think the entire team looks better. 
    • We should have been at least trying for Delap, like slapping a fee in front of them and make them knock it back as opposed to doing nothing. We are one injury away from disaster up front and as bad as Jacskon has been we actually need him. We have dicked around this month and got nothing that has strengthened us and simply made ourselves more exposed. 
    • People said the same thing about Bakayoko. 'He was good/ok' at Monaco'. In Bakayoko's case, I saw a lot of him at Monaco owing to that exciting team they put together and was telling everyone before we brought him that he was an absolute donkey and owed his career to Fabinho.  As for Disaster, I suspect someone was also bailing him out, as I cannot see how he can be a functioning CB for a PL team unless they go full Dyche and having him sit on the 18 yard line hoofing balls down to pitch an
    • Not sure who we where going to buy? At CF I am pretty convinced Delap is the player they want now. No way where Ipswich selling him in Jan. At CB, who was there? One of the players City brought? However, once City get involved it becomes very difficult owing to wages. Marmoush for instance is now on a reported £250-300k per week. If the AM option was Tel, then I am happy we didn't sign him. Luiz was the only player we were linked with that made any sense but his situation is complicated by his m
    • He was fine at Monaco, keep him to his limited role and he'll be fine.  I didn't get why the club/Maresca decided to use him as a RB, he wasn't a great defender to begin with and then you put him up against wingers and attacking mids....
    • He was never ever coming here
    • Well....at least we didn't add that Brighton striker!   That's a massive positive from the window.    
    • Disaster will do well if all he has to do is attack set pieces in the opposition box and doesn't have to defend, pass or run back. 
    • When he is on solid food
  • Player Threads

×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You