Frank Lampard

[iseah100 5,612]

Are you missing this loan to Manchester City deal on purpose?

For 6 months to stay in shape. Not a big deal. He will not have a press conference holding up a City jersey. Seriously, questioning his loyalty after EVERYTHING he did for this club has me absolutely irate. It's so stupid.

[LDN Blue 7,903]

For 6 months to stay in shape. Not a big deal. He will not have a press conference holding up a City jersey. Seriously, questioning his loyalty after EVERYTHING he did for this club has me absolutely irate. It's so stupid.

And what if he's then called upon to play? What if he scores a goal that gives them 3 points over us to lift the title?

[HD3D 1,038]

Apparently, we were wrong and naive not to see the link.

So what if he signed for a club linked with City? I see nothing wrong with that.

I would be shocked if he went to City though, but I personally don't believe it. He wouldn't do that to the fans, to Jose and the Chelsea board.

[BenIsLegend 475]

If this does happen then its got to be a pop at us from City. He isn't going to get minutes there to improve his fitness, this would purely be City saying look we've got one of your legends. It's a fucking mind game.

[LDN Blue 7,903]

Pathetic. The guy's a legend and anyone who wants to question his loyalty needs their head examined.

It's not a great situation but it's just the way it's worked out. He plays for a City sister club so it makes sense he'd train there.

Of course he's a Chelsea legend, for what he's done FOR the club. Tell me how him going to a TITLE RIVAL is not a call of loyalty? If they were pre-Qatar money City, sure.. Go ahead. But a direct title rival? That doesn't bother you one bit?

[boshman 1,073]

Lamps.... why?? So disappointed in you

[iseah100 5,612]

He is playing for citeh if he goes on loan there. He would be a REGISTERED player for them, not for "USA". Fucking idiot...

And? So he's disloyal for going there for 6 months on loan to stay in shape? Don't be ridiculous.

[We Hate Scouse 10,260]

Genuinely can't believe people are defending him going to our direct rivals for the league. He's going there to train? Yeah because he can't run in America right.

[Kieran. 6,317]

Players really don't give a fuck about us

[We Hate Scouse 10,260]

And? So he's disloyal for going there for 6 months on loan to stay in shape? Don't be ridiculous.

Yes he has to go to our direct rivals to train. It's the only viable option. You're completely right.

[iseah100 5,612]

And what if he's then called upon to play? What if he scores a goal that gives them 3 points over us to lift the title?

I'll hit the lottery before THAT happens.

[Korea 734]

Genuinely can't believe people are defending him going to our direct rivals for the league. He's going there to train? Yeah because he can't run in America right.

Of course, England has world class facilities, while USA is a third world country with nothing.

[iseah100 5,612]

Yes he has to go to our direct rivals to train. It's the only viable option. You're completely right.

Well, I can go train with world class players to stay in shape, or go to motherfucking Melbourne. Yea.

[LDN Blue 7,903]

Genuinely can't believe people are defending him going to our direct rivals for the league. He's going there to train? Yeah because he can't run in America right.

This baffles me so much. He's not going to Uncle Harry's team here.. It's a direct rival who will be fighting his ex-club. Lampard won't be throwing games in our favour. Out of all the clubs who he could "train" with. He could "train" with us ffs.

[empire of emotions 247]

disappointed, not surprised tho

[Pizy 17,860]

Genuinely can't believe people are defending him going to our direct rivals for the league. He's going there to train? Yeah because he can't run in America right.

Spot fucking on.

Work out with a world class fitness coach over here in the States or at home in London. Not Man fucking City.

[The only place to be 11,313]

Of course he's a Chelsea legend, for what he's done FOR the club. Tell me how him going to a TITLE RIVAL is not a call of loyalty? If they were pre-Qatar money City, sure.. Go ahead. But a direct title rival? That doesn't bother you one bit?

We let him go.

We have these players who have this drive and determination that gives us great days out (or things to brag about on Facebook) and then expect them simply to give it up when we're done with them?

He's still Frank. He's got to play somewhere, he still has ambitions to play for England so why wouldn't he put himself at the highest level he could?

Where else realistically could afford him and play him at the level he still obviously thinks he deserves.

[Cosmin 2,484]

Maybe we will loan him