LAM09 7,100 Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 Are you being sarcastic. I don't recally many 50m+ signing last season except the one being done by CityNope. I'm talking about fees in general around Europe have risen & these types of fees are looked at in the same way.Lukaku, Morata, Chamberlain, Dembele, Lacazette to name a few that cost close to that or more. In addition, Mendy was the only player that cost over £50m that City signed over the summer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
communicate 2,703 Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 1 hour ago, LAM09 said: Nope. I'm talking about fees in general around Europe have risen & these types of fees are looked at in the same way. Lukaku, Morata, Chamberlain, Dembele, Lacazette to name a few that cost close to that or more. In addition, Mendy was the only player that cost over £50m that City signed over the summer. Lukaku,Morata,Lacazette fee are strikers, it is normal for striker transfer fee to be 50 or more. We signed Torres for 50 m, and it was a while ago. Chamberlain fee was around 35. Our signing are all less than 50 except Morata. United are all less than 50 except Lukaku, Arsenal all less than 50 excpet Lacazette, Spurs all less than 50. City signed Mendy and Walker both for 50 m plus I think B. Silva was around 47.5 m. 50 m is not the new normal. This City is like Chelsea under Mou in his 1st term. At that point we outspent everybody on the transfer market Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LAM09 7,100 Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 Lukaku,Morata,Lacazette fee are strikers, it is normal for striker transfer fee to be 50 or more. We signed Torres for 50 m, and it was a while ago. Chamberlain fee was around 35. Our signing are all less than 50 except Morata. United are all less than 50 except Lukaku, Arsenal all less than 50 excpet Lacazette, Spurs all less than 50. City signed Mendy and Walker both for 50 m plus I think B. Silva was around 47.5 m. 50 m is not the new normal. This City is like Chelsea under Mou in his 1st term. At that point we outspent everybody on the transfer market http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/20-most-expensive-transfer-deals-10878202 I never said £50m is the new norm, but it's a fee that is touted almost everywhere nowadays for most players. It doesn't raise eyebrows like it did when he signed Torres. City will get a pass along as they aren't spending 50m+ on multiple players & making a profit (https://www.theguardian.com/football/2017/nov/08/manchester-city-record-revenues-accounts-wages-2016-17). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
communicate 2,703 Posted November 24, 2017 Share Posted November 24, 2017 It is funny if you just listen to the media you will think that there is no chance for teams like Arsenal but looking at the table there is very little that separate the 7th spot Burnley with 22 points and the 2nd spot United with 26 points. The only team that is running away right now is City Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lorenzo Schettino 1 Posted November 24, 2017 Share Posted November 24, 2017 8 hours ago, communicate said: It is funny if you just listen to the media you will think that there is no chance for teams like Arsenal but looking at the table there is very little that separate the 7th spot Burnley with 22 points and the 2nd spot United with 26 points. The only team that is running away right now is City I think the Burnley surprised everyone, but we can't compare tham to the "big". But yes, I agree with the media, there isn't a chance for teams like Arsenal (maybe only this year) because the city is running us hell ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leif 6,006 Posted November 25, 2017 Share Posted November 25, 2017 9 out of 10 times this season, Alli has been so, so, so, so bad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leif 6,006 Posted November 25, 2017 Share Posted November 25, 2017 Man United have made 0 tackles in 35 minutes, Brighton have made 12. There's a lot to take from that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milan 17,997 Posted November 25, 2017 Share Posted November 25, 2017 Man United with a fluke and 3 points. Far from convincing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laylabelle 9,754 Posted November 26, 2017 Share Posted November 26, 2017 Arsenal last minute penalty..now 1 behind us...boo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
communicate 2,703 Posted November 26, 2017 Share Posted November 26, 2017 The level of football by city is just fantastic plus this Leroy sane guy is so fast N so direct Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kmk108 1,186 Posted November 26, 2017 Share Posted November 26, 2017 As excited as I was for that goal, I can’t help but think this will end 1-3. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pizy 19,381 Posted November 26, 2017 Share Posted November 26, 2017 City will probably still win 4-1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Special Juan 28,871 Posted November 26, 2017 Share Posted November 26, 2017 Love to see City lose this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milan 17,997 Posted November 26, 2017 Share Posted November 26, 2017 Well that was quick. Not even 1 minute after HT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kmk108 1,186 Posted November 26, 2017 Share Posted November 26, 2017 Srsly? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milan 17,997 Posted November 26, 2017 Share Posted November 26, 2017 City are playing some quality football and are getting all the lucky touches/deflections. Everything going their way at the moment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jase 43,479 Posted November 26, 2017 Share Posted November 26, 2017 There should be a trophy for the team who finish second this season. Can't fault City but they (and Lady Luck) are making the title race this season extremely dull. communicate 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leif 6,006 Posted November 26, 2017 Share Posted November 26, 2017 He's not the better player, obviously i'd sooner have Hazard for one season than Sterling for five, but this season Raheem is so much more productive than I think Hazard's ever been. But, if Hazard played for City...he might get a goal and assist every single game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrExcalibur100 7,124 Posted November 26, 2017 Share Posted November 26, 2017 5 minutes ago, Leif said: He's not the better player, obviously i'd sooner have Hazard for one season than Sterling for five, but this season Raheem is so much more productive than I think Hazard's ever been. But, if Hazard played for City...he might get a goal and assist every single game. I'm not sure what you mean by productive. Last season Hazard had more keypasses from open play than any other player in Europe's top 5 leagues but yet had only 5 assists which says a lot about his teammates. Sterling has never come close to that. https://www.whoscored.com/Articles/pIE68Mj2lU6L-wBGAJVziw/Show/European-Team-of-the-Season-ST-Eden-Hazard-(Chelsea) It's easy to be productive as a forward when you play for a team that has scored 42 goals in 13 games, totally dominates the ball (averaging 63% possession) and creates chances for fun. Sterling can afford to score a lot of tap-ins this season thanks to that brand of football. Hazard at this stage last season had 9 goals in the league. Let's see if Sterling can continue to score. Even in this insanely stacked City side its very likely he regresses to the mean. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
communicate 2,703 Posted November 26, 2017 Share Posted November 26, 2017 I think city does improve their play a bit compare to last season. That make sense in 2nd year with relatively the same squad. But having a good GK and good fb for me has been the key for them. Last season I remember how they concede plenty of cheap goals from simple long ball. Looks like it will not happen often this season because their fb are not slow anymore. Now they can provide cover for their CB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts