Popular Post! edetarod 2,155 Posted December 13, 2014 Popular Post! Share Posted December 13, 2014 he has made his intentions clear, he wants to stop Chelsea from winning the league and is doing a very good job so far Kieran., Amblève., kellzfresh and 4 others 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucio 5,418 Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 If mourinho loved us he would have never beaten us with inter.Just like Lampard should not score goals for City....But hey they can't do that because they are professional.mourinho faced us due to pure circumstance. lampard purposely chose to oppose us. stroey, Polo7, The Chels and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Chels 2,502 Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 Wasn't mourinho the same for Chelsea?And when he joined inter and we had to play against them he talked thrash about us.But that's what mourinho must do because he's a professional, likewise Lampard.Mourinho was here for just over 3 years and had his whole career ahead of him. When he left he joined an Italian club. Compare that to Lampard who was here for 13 years, became Chelsea's highest ever goalscorer and in many people's opinion our best ever player. Right at the end of his career decided to join our biggest title rivals for the money. You can't see the distinction? stroey, Polo7, lucio and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fernando 6,657 Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 Lol theres no other explanation. You are an idiot. Im not expecting Lampard to not score goals for City, I was expecting Lampard to not CHOOSE to play for a direct rival. But he never did join a direct rival he joined an mls team. It was city that got him to come over from his sister club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Polo7 3,496 Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 But he never did join a direct rival he joined an mls team.It was city that got him to come over from his sister club.They forced him at gun point? The Chels and stroey 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fernando 6,657 Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 mourinho faced us due to pure circumstance. lampard purposely chose to oppose us.If it was purposely he would have directly join city. He joined an mls team that hasn't even started their season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! lucio 5,418 Posted December 13, 2014 Popular Post! Share Posted December 13, 2014 But he never did join a direct rival he joined an mls team.It was city that got him to come over from his sister club.he pretended to join an mls team. because he is a liar and a fraud as well as a traitor. he joined a "team" who dont exist. surely you dont fall for his excuse. trying to save his rep Amblève., The Chels, Kieran. and 2 others 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Chels 2,502 Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 Of course, why would he turn it down though? If anyone wins them the title it'd be Aguero, not Frank and his 4 goals.His 4 goals (and counting) have got them a lot of points though. Took 2 off us and earned them 1 with the draw (net 3), scored against Southampton when they were just getting back into the game, scored against Hull to kill them off and won the game for them today. That's probably 6-10 points which is very significant. Kieran., stroey and kellzfresh 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fernando 6,657 Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 Mourinho was here for just over 3 years and had his whole career ahead of him. When he left he joined an Italian club. Compare that to Lampard who was here for 13 years, became Chelsea's highest ever goalscorer and in many people's opinion our best ever player. Right at the end of his career decided to join our biggest title rivals for the money. You can't see the distinction?No I can't see the distinction because Lampard joined an mls team. He didn't join directly to City. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laylabelle 9,586 Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 Our loss and draws have cost us so far.never mind what they do what matters is us and our performances.they win they win long as we keep going it won't matter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Chels 2,502 Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 No I can't see the distinction because Lampard joined an mls team.He didn't join directory to City. you STILL believe that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fernando 6,657 Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 you STILL believe that?Do you see nycfc playing in the mls yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ainsley Harriott 2,732 Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 No I can't see the distinction because Lampard joined an mls team. He didn't join directly to City.But he had to accept the loan. Not like he didn't have a choice. The Chels 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Chels 2,502 Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 Do you see nycfc playing in the mls yet? You're in denial. How will you explain it when Lampard decides to stay at City for the rest of the season? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueLyon 9,359 Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 Worst is that Lamps is trying harder for city than he did for us last season. Fucker. Tomo and Kieran. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fernando 6,657 Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 You're in denial. How will you explain it when Lampard decides to stay at City for the rest of the season?When does the mls season starts and when does it finished? I would think it be messed up if he stays for his full contract at city. Like if he signed 4 years with nycfc and never did any of those at the mls team. Then that would be shady. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LAB 1,030 Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 Come on Newcastle, make my day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kellzfresh 7,229 Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 Worst is that Lamps is trying harder for city than he did for us last season. Fucker.He's trying to prove us wrong for letting him go. I won't judge him yet, but if he extends his contract after the mls starts in USA and mancity end up winning the league, then he's a huge traitor that doesn't deserve to be my best ever Chelsea player anymore. Even Ashley Cole moves above him in that scenario. Fernando 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xPetrCechx 13,586 Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 Only ourselves to blame if we will not with the league....lamps goals hurts me, but all his 211 for us, not. RoyalBlues 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iseah100 5,612 Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 Lol theres no other explanation. You are an idiot. Im not expecting Lampard to not score goals for City, I was expecting Lampard to not CHOOSE to play for a direct rival. Lol you're silly. His 4 goals (and counting) have got them a lot of points though. Took 2 off us and earned them 1 with the draw (net 3), scored against Southampton when they were just getting back into the game, scored against Hull to kill them off and won the game for them today. That's probably 6-10 points which is very significant.That's a stretch. He WON them 3 today, and the two off of us. That's all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now