Jump to content

🇮🇹 Roberto Di Matteo


James
 Share

Recommended Posts

Drop Ramires? Really?

Ramires from RW.For me its either drop Mata or Ramires.We either play 4-3-3 with Rami or 4-2-3-1 with Mata.Personally I prefer 4-3-3, I don't really see the Mata hype here, he is good but not really on Silva, Iniesta's level and probably never will.But one thing is as clear as daylight Lampard has to step away asap !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ramires from RW.For me its either drop Mata or Ramires.We either play 4-3-3 with Rami or 4-2-3-1 with Mata.Personally I prefer 4-3-3, I don't really see the Mata hype here, he is good but not really on Silva, Iniesta's level and probably never will.But one thing is as clear as daylight Lampard has to step away asap !

I can't believe how much you're underrating Mata. He is a class player and at his best is almost as good as Silva. He is only 24 so can get better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't believe how much you're underrating Mata. He is a class player and at his best is almost as good as Silva. He is only 24 so can get better.

imo mata's just as good as silva , both players were great last season , silva looked better in a championship winning team. this season mata has better players around him so we'll see what happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IF we do switch back to the 4-3-3, then Malouda becomes an option and we'll have 6 midfielders in total then. That said, playing Malouda as one of the 3 midfielders in the CM is not going to benefit him or us as that will negate his main strengths.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are a couple of other problems with the 4-3-3. The main one is that it moves Hazard and Mata to wingers from a more central position. Hazard is most effective up the middle behind the striker. Ideally, you'd want Hazard and Mata being the creators. Moving them to the wing puts more emphasis on them crossing the ball and running up and down the wings. Chelsea actually spent about 80M pounds in the last two years on players that should be playing behind the striker. It just doesn't make sense to switch to a system that would remove that position entirely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are a couple of other problems with the 4-3-3. The main one is that it moves Hazard and Mata to wingers from a more central position. Hazard is most effective up the middle behind the striker. Ideally, you'd want Hazard and Mata being the creators. Moving them to the wing puts more emphasis on them crossing the ball and running up and down the wings. Chelsea actually spent about 80M pounds in the last two years on players that should be playing behind the striker. It just doesn't make sense to switch to a system that would remove that position entirely.

Not necessarily bad...When Anelka played in the 4-3-3 he was allowed to roam around the attacking third...Even Malouda would tuck into the centre on occasion with Ashley Cole doing an overlap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not necessarily bad...When Anelka played in the 4-3-3 he was allowed to roam around the attacking third...Even Malouda would tuck into the centre on occasion with Ashley Cole doing an overlap.

They can tuck into the middle, but they won't be the creators as long as they are on the wings. The field general needs to be in a more naturally central position. Chelsea are sort of stuck between two places right now. They have 3 players they want to start who can all play the #10 and plenty of wingers but are woefully thin in central midfield. I am assuming they will stay with the 4-2-3-1 and try to work Oscar into at least part-time duty the double pivot, but that's a big risk to take.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ramirez on the right wing crap needs to stop, been awful this season, in fact the whole right hand side needs to step up. Can't recall a decent final delivery from either him or Iva.

Perhaps Ramirez needs to be pushed back into the pivot (I have my doubts but hope he proves me wrong). I think it's worth trying Luiz in the DM role, it's a gamble, but could pay off handsomely if it works.

Seems the double Pivot has replaced lack of width as our major problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...