Laylabelle 9,534 Posted September 3, 2009 Share Posted September 3, 2009 (edited) What a load of crap! One tranfer window fair enough but 2?! Who knows what the situation be by next year.And seeing as some of our players aint getting any younger and it aint like the guy is playing first team football...Feel sorry for Carlo as well.He had nout to do with this yet really its him whose gana get slated at times and cant add to his squad if he wanted to if he saw a problem in an area etc/players wanting to leaveJan 2011 is a lonng way offYeh FIFA and so hate us we know it but now its plain bloody clear!But hopfully be nice to us like they were Roma..doubt it though cause its us..prob still fuming the fact 2 of our bans got overturned for CL Edited September 3, 2009 by Laylabelle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueLion. 21,491 Posted September 3, 2009 Share Posted September 3, 2009 If Anelka gets injured before / during ACON... Bubye Trophies this season.Be serious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomlewis7 0 Posted September 3, 2009 Share Posted September 3, 2009 This is such a load of bollocks....Man United have been reported for tapping up a 15 year old French kid THIS transfer window...What happens to them...Fuck all....This is just a vendetta against Chelsea. Just like Uefa, FIFA dont like the fact that Chelsea were taken over by a rich owner and became successfull in a short period of time...Uefa are always being wankers to Chelsea. And this is also a vendetta against English clubs, because Eduardo has been banned for 2 games for diving....Whens the last time players got banned for diving..It happens. Its total shit. Butttt...My dad told me Roma got punished for this a couple of years ago, appealed and it got reduced to just ONE transfer window. So we can only hope for the same. Kakuta is one of our best young players aswell, and how he has become useless for around 4 months. OH DEAR. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badboy 1,526 Posted September 3, 2009 Share Posted September 3, 2009 (edited) I really am in shock i turned sky sports news on in my restaurant and just could not serve any body. I have been drinking all the coffee in the restaurant all day i cant believe it. Edited September 3, 2009 by Badboy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caesarblues 51 Posted September 3, 2009 Share Posted September 3, 2009 :ballack::censored:If we'd signed Kakuta during a Championship/Champions League winning season and he'd scored a reasonable amount of goals in the first XI, I would fully expect FIFA to punish us, but the way they've gone about this is crazy. They're clearly using British clubs as example to the rest of the world. Arsenal last week, us this week. We all know Platini/Blatter etc hate Chelsea FC with a passion, but fuck!...he was only 15 at the fuckin time and has only played reserve football since being with us! After that disgrace of a game against Barca, FIFA have clearly upped the anti and will now transfer-ban ANY and EVERY club who 'taps up' a player. Just as UEFA will ban any player for 2 games once video evidence was produced AFTER the game of a dive that a referee missed. I wont hold my breathe on either of them though...Fuck FIFA and Fuck UEFA. I really wish we could just boycott the CL. All run by a corrupt bunch of biased c*ntslove your sig mate :thumbsup:indeed FiFa is freakin disgrace Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zolayes 14,489 Posted September 3, 2009 Share Posted September 3, 2009 french club complain ,,run to platini ,,he calls his pal blatter ,,oh yes its Chelsea ...lets stuff them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TGS 7 Posted September 3, 2009 Share Posted September 3, 2009 This is such a load of bollocks....Man United have been reported for tapping up a 15 year old French kid THIS transfer window...What happens to them...Fuck all....This is just a vendetta against Chelsea. Just like Uefa, FIFA dont like the fact that Chelsea were taken over by a rich owner and became successfull in a short period of time...Uefa are always being wankers to Chelsea. And this is also a vendetta against English clubs, because Eduardo has been banned for 2 games for diving....Whens the last time players got banned for diving..It happens. Its total shit. Butttt...My dad told me Roma got punished for this a couple of years ago, appealed and it got reduced to just ONE transfer window. So we can only hope for the same. Kakuta is one of our best young players aswell, and how he has become useless for around 4 months. OH DEAR.100% Agree with you... Roman will help us I trust in Abramovich Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TGS 7 Posted September 3, 2009 Share Posted September 3, 2009 (edited) Delete this plz... Edited September 3, 2009 by TGS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macedonia 0 Posted September 3, 2009 Share Posted September 3, 2009 i just still cant belive... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laylabelle 9,534 Posted September 3, 2009 Share Posted September 3, 2009 Bleh Romas Roma we're Chelsea..cant see it.Hoping they'll realise how harsh and stupid they're being but doubt it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fulham Broadway 17,310 Posted September 3, 2009 Share Posted September 3, 2009 It's not tapping up that is the issue, it is breach of contract. Firstly i would like to know what sort of contract Kakuta could possibly have had at 15 years old...... there is no way he could have signed a pro contract. So how can FIFA dish out the same punishment as to what they gave out for a breach of a pro contract. And what "proof" is there that we intentionally coherced Kakuta to break whatever contract it was he had?Also what happens when come next summer we want to register our next batch of youngsters and give them pro contracts? We won't be able to do it.... it could mean we end up losing a host of talented youngsters to other clubs next summer....Its being described as tapping up by the BBC and French media. Anyway its the same thing. There is a chink of light in the fact that the club Sirius? did the same with an Egyptian keeper, FIFA handed them a new signing ban, and the Court of Arbitration, (highest sport court) has suspended FIFAs decision. The football authorities seem to be chucking their weight around at the moment, Eduardo, hoolaganism panics, and now this. They should be doing something positive for the fans , instead of just being attention seeking control freaks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laylabelle 9,534 Posted September 3, 2009 Share Posted September 3, 2009 They do something unexpected like reduce our match bans then do something also completly unexpected and crazy like ban one guy for diving and letting the rest go and us for this with a daft punishmentAnd yeh exactly!!Like sort out the whole goal line situation rather then punish the manager who moans about it and all.Like said doing stuff for the fans rather stuff that majorly piss them off Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the wes 7,212 Posted September 3, 2009 Share Posted September 3, 2009 UEFA stop us from wining the champion league now FIFA are trying to stop us from wining the premier league Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thejolta 1 Posted September 3, 2009 Share Posted September 3, 2009 This doesn't look good. Apparently this was a preset rule (the 2 window ban).http://www.fifa.com/mm/document/affederation/administration/66/98/97/statusandtransfer_en_2505.pdf3. In addition to the obligation to pay compensation, sporting sanctions shall also be imposed on any player found to be in breach of contract during the protected period. This sanction shall be a four-month restriction on playing in offi cial matches. In the case of aggravating circumstances, the restriction shall last six months. In all cases, these sporting sanctions shall take effect from the start of the following season at the new club. Unilateral breach without just cause or sporting just cause after the protected period shall not result in sporting sanctions. Disciplinary measures may, however, be imposed outside the protected period for failure to give notice of termination within 15 days of the last offi cial match of the season (including national cups) of the club with which the player is registered. The protected period starts again when, while renewing the contract, the duration of the previous contract is extended.16 IV. MAINTENANCE OF CONTRACTUAL STABILITY BETWEEN PROFESIONALS AND CLUBS 4. In addition to the obligation to pay compensation, sporting sanctions shall be imposed on any club found to be in breach of contract or found to be inducing a breach of contract during the protected period. It shall be presumed, unless established to the contrary, that any club signing a professional who has terminated his contract without just cause has induced that professional to commit a breach. The club shall be banned from registering any new players, either nationally or internationally, for two registration periods. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matterz 67 Posted September 3, 2009 Share Posted September 3, 2009 I find it very strange that we get penalized so harshly for trying to sign a 15 year old unknown, however Fifa seem to think that Real Madrids efforts to sign Ronaldo last season are acceptable. It reaaly boggles my mind, especially seeing as clubs like Man Utd have been doing it for years. But once again I have to applaud a footballing governing body for being completely biased and incompetant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aesthetic Relic 301 Posted September 3, 2009 Author Share Posted September 3, 2009 Heres something to wet your appetite.....Le Harve furiousLe Harve reacted on Friday with a long and virulent official statement against Manchester United regarding the recruitment of Paul Pogba, the captain of their under 16's. The Normandy club, relegated to Ligue 2, ensures that a non-solicitation agreement was signed in Autumn 2006 between the player and his parents, which would enable Pogba to sign a professional contract, "once the player had become of age and completed the educational criteria required by law." The professional contract was to begin in the 2009-2010 season.But, "Manchester United had offered great sums of money to the parents with the goal of obtaining a transfer of their child to the English club, " announced Le Havre. "At the moment when numerous voices, including levels of government, the European Union, UEFA and FIFA are protesting against the drafting in of young players, Manchester United does not hesitate to uproot a 16 year old. HAC recalls that a few weeks ago these same leaders [Ferguson], claimed to give lessons of morality on the sums spent by certain clubs during the beginning of the transfer market, yet today have found time to plunder Le Havre and French football of one of its best young talents."Watcha gonna do Mr Blatter ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shane 2,275 Posted September 3, 2009 Share Posted September 3, 2009 I think they'll abandon the Champions League final this year when we go 2-0 up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drogba11CFC 108 Posted September 3, 2009 Share Posted September 3, 2009 Why a ban when you can simply take o=more of our money Mr Blatter? Banned from the brothel by any chance? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warnie_666 1,081 Posted September 3, 2009 Share Posted September 3, 2009 Its being described as tapping up by the BBC and French media. Anyway its the same thing. There is a chink of light in the fact that the club Sirius? did the same with an Egyptian keeper, FIFA handed them a new signing ban, and the Court of Arbitration, (highest sport court) has suspended FIFAs decision. The football authorities seem to be chucking their weight around at the moment, Eduardo, hoolaganism panics, and now this. They should be doing something positive for the fans , instead of just being attention seeking control freaks.FB, I think you are talking about the FC Sion. The ban hasnt been revoked. The Ban has been suspended till the Court of Arbitration takes a decision which allowed them to buy players this summer.Chelsea will appeal for the ban to be annulled till the decision is made by the CoA which will allow Chelsea to possible gor for Aguero or Ribery irrespective of whether they are cup tied or NOT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warnie_666 1,081 Posted September 3, 2009 Share Posted September 3, 2009 <h1 class="heading">Manchester United could face similar transfer ban to Chelsea</h1> Matt Dickinson, Chief Sports Correspondent Recommend? <div id="region-column1-layout2"> <div id="related-article-links">Manchester United could be the second of the Barclays Premier League's “big four” to be hit by a transfer ban after Le Havre confirmed yesterday that they are pursuing a “very similar” case to that won by Lens against Chelsea.Alain Belsoeur, the managing director of Le Havre, told The Times that the outcome of the Chelsea hearing was “very important and very encouraging” as they seek Fifa sanctions against United for allegedly “stealing” Paul Pogba, the teenage prodigy.Le Havre insist that Pogba was under contract to them when he left for United this summer. They claim to have a pre-contract agreement signed by the player - and witnessed by his parents - in November 2006 that committed him to a professional contract from his 16th birthday, in March. Instead, the player allegedly walked away and turned up at Old Trafford.The French club claim to have evidence that inducements were offered to Pogba's parents and say that details will be included in their submission to Fifa. <h3 class="section-heading">Related Links</h3>Chelsea to appeal stunning transfer ban <ul class="chevron-list chevron-blue"><li> United have strenuously denied that they made any payments or have done anything against the rules. “It is complete nonsense,” a spokesman said. “Everything has been done within Uefa guidelines.”Nevertheless, Fifa has yet to grant international clearance for Pogba to represent United and, with the French federation supporting Le Havre, it appears certain that the case will go before the world governing body.“Of course we are still pursuing our case,” Belsoeur said. “It is a very serious case. We are confident that we'll win because it is in the best interests not just of our club but of sport.“We spend €5million [about £4.3million] on our academy every year out of a turnover of €12million. It is a huge investment. We do that to give a chance to our players to develop for our first team, not to be an academy for others. What is the point of investing in an academy if the players leave at 16? This is clearly a message from Fifa to protect the education system.”Le Havre, from Ligue 2, have a history of developing teenage talent and also of litigation against English clubs. They were engaged in a legal battle with Newcastle United over Charles N'Zogbia that lasted more than three years.Le Havre insisted that N'Zogbia had breached his contract and were initially awarded €300,000 in compensation by Fifa. They appealed and in 2007 the Court of Arbitration for Sport insisted that N'Zogbia should pay £440,000 and Newcastle £200,000. “It took 3 years and we received about a quarter of what Newcastle received from Wigan when they sold the player,” Belsoeur said. He described Newcastle at the time as “predators”.In the case of Pogba, Le Havre signed him at 13 from a small club in Paris. They had high hopes for the defensive midfield player, who has captained France Under-16s. But they heard rumours in May that United were interested.They claim that they rang Old Trafford to explain that Pogba was under contract and say that they spoke directly to Brian McClair, United's academy director.United went ahead with signing Pogba as a scholar and, according to Belsoeur, offered him a deal worth £3,500 a week as soon as he turns 17, the age at which players in England can sign full professional contracts.Belsoeur said that many clubs in Europe would be delighted at the punishment against Chelsea because they were fed up with rich Premier League clubs poaching the best young talent. “We are not the only club who have had players stolen,” Belsoeur said.“The reputation of British clubs is that they don't produce many players for their national team but take them away from foreign countries. We hope this [Fifa's ruling] will change the behaviour of English clubs, but we will have to see.” Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.