Jump to content

The Next Manager?


 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Gundalf said:

Good to see that every candidate only wants to join in the summer and not now. No point in appointing them now. Even the candidates themselfs seems to follow that.

Trouble is, getting these last few matches could’ve given the new manager a firsthand look at who he wants to move on. Watching them in training everyday etc. 

Now they’ll have to waste time in the summer or preseason for weeks seeing who they fancy or who they don’t.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, NikkiCFC said:

Would Jokanovic accept interim role? Ex Chelsea player, better CV then Lamps. Promoted 2 teams to PL. 

If getting 2 teams promoted to the PL (both with the biggest budgets in their division also) is the category for getting a job at this club we may as well have kept Potter. I hope you are joking.

14 minutes ago, Tomo said:

If this lunatic returns then I'm done.

Tbf him or Lampard, it’s horrendous decision making. The squads still suited to a 3 at the back clearly but even then going for Conte would be mad. But going for Lampard is even worse imo.

4 minutes ago, Gundalf said:

Good to see that every candidate only wants to join in the summer and not now. No point in appointing them now. Even the candidates themselfs seems to follow that.

Wait what… good to see? Is it? Why not appoint someone now who we envisage managing us long term and give them a chance at figuring out the squad, who they need to move on, who they should build around, what positions need strengthening in etc?

I mean the decision making process at this club under Boehly & Clearlake is absolutely baffling. Plus we have other clubs to contend with then for certain managers, the longer it goes on, the increasingly likelihood someone else will make a move for Nagelsmann, Pochettino, Zidane, Enrique, or whoever…

Edited by OneMoSalah
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Pizy said:

Trouble is, getting these last few matches could’ve given the new manager a firsthand look at who he wants to move on. Watching them in training everyday etc. 

Now they’ll have to waste time in the summer or preseason for weeks seeing who they fancy or who they don’t.

Enrique and Nagelsmann dont seem to insist on that, so maybe thats just another fan perspective that isnt really important to a real coach. In this day and age u dont have to attend training sessions so assess players, nowadays its all data driven. Im sure the candidates can have a look on the players remotely. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find it hard to believe that both Enrique and Naggelsman were unavailable.

And even if they needed an interim, why Lampard?

Clueless move only to try and pander to the fans. There's no logic behind their decisions.

They're setting things up to ruin our next season as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, NikkiCFC said:

Lampard appointment pros:

Very good English 👍 

I honestly wonder if that's the reasoning behind the owners' thinking.

So they can chat whatever nonsense they want with the managers over lunch or just 'communicate' their nonsensical vision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lampard 2.0 is much better than the previous Lampard. He has now so much more experience having successfully managed big teams in the interim! If he sends Felix back, that's good enough for me tho.

I'd not go for Benedict right now and just wait out for when Bayern to sack Tuchel and get him back. Maybe by then he had time to find another nice young German woman. Only manager who can sell relentless high press every freaking season is Pep; I don't know what he promises the players, but it evidently works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Tomo said:

The problem is if he does have a succesful interim spell the crowd will pressure the board into making him permanent and I wouldn't be surprised if they do it, so when the inevitable 'muscle memory' from previous coaching wades off and we start playing like Stoke again (like we did post lockdown) we're back to the exact same problems of early 2021, with a toxic split fanbase of one's who can let sentiment go vs one's that can't and probably a section of the fanbase who can't or won't warm to the new boss because he's not Frank.

That's the thing isn't it? If we go an epic run in the CL, or just simply turn around our league form, we will face this question. 

Fat chance that the owners would tell Lampard to quietly move on. Especially if he's bringing several team members on board.

In any case, I'd be interested in seeing what statement they put out if they do hire him. The clue will be in how explicit they are about his terms of stay.

This isn't like old man Hiddink signing on as interim until Ancelloti became available.

I have a feeling that their no.1 choice (guessing Naggelsman) wasn't ready to join, and they weren't too sure about the second choice (guessing Enrique), and so they decided to drag it out until the summer. 

And they decided to instil Lampard as the scapegoat until then., so that at least the match-going fans would keep quiet.

Edited by Blue Armour
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DDA said:

I had to endure showing my face at work where 80% of the work force are Gooners. I can't defend this shit...

23 more days until you win. We will prevent them from becoming champions in their own yard. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Points towards nagelsmann imo. I can see him needing a break after being abruptly sacked by Bayern. If he ended up facing them and tuchel and getting stomped it would damage him at a young age. Enrique I think would take over today and would be way better than lampard for the rest of the season. if we are going for an interim, it will be nagelsmann coming , I reckon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let me get this right........

 

We (the club) spent 250 million pounds on new signings for a manager we then sacked 6 (or so) games in.....

 

Then we paid 20 million odd pound release to get a young, inexperienced replacement manager on a 5 year contract.........

 

Then we backed that manager to the tune of 350 odd million pounds in January....

 

Then we sacked that manager less than 9 months into that 5 year contract after spending 350 odd million pounds on players for him without even having a replacement in line........

 

Now we are bringing in an interim manager who already failed at the club previously and asking him to fix things?......

 

Never a dull moment I guess..........

 

Found this on the shed end, the more I read it the more I face palm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You