Jump to content

Chelsea Transfers


J.F.
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Blue Armour said:

7 goals conceded in a week, in 3 games.

I bet the board's solution will be to bring in another couple of no-name wingers to compensate.

tbh, maresca ask for a new center back but they dont give a shit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Mário César said:

tbh, maresca ask for a new center back but they dont give a shit

We already had a pretty good young CB at the club (Veiga) and the decision was made to sell him and keep Tosin/Chalobah/Fofana.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Blue Armour said:

7 goals conceded in a week, in 3 games.

I bet the board's solution will be to bring in another couple of no-name wingers to compensate.

Just wait for the next two games, Brighton & Liverpool will be having a party at the Bridge.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Reddish-Blue said:

We already had a pretty good young CB at the club (Veiga) and the decision was made to sell him and keep Tosin/Chalobah/Fofana.  

The decisions are ALL based on money and orientated around profit margins.

It came out the other day that the SD’s advised not to sell Madueke in fear of it being a mistake. Now he might go on to be utter shit but the owners still sanctioned the sale against the SDs wishes. That tells you everything you need to know. How can we put up with this.. these owners are taking the piss. Maresca crying out for a CB and they buy Garnacho. Now Maresca wont play £95m of wingers instead a young George who was neary sold. Wtf is this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, DDA said:

The decisions are ALL based on money and orientated around profit margins.

It came out the other day that the SD’s advised not to sell Madueke in fear of it being a mistake. Now he might go on to be utter shit but the owners still sanctioned the sale against the SDs wishes. That tells you everything you need to know. How can we put up with this.. these owners are taking the piss. Maresca crying out for a CB and they buy Garnacho. Now Maresca wont play £95m of wingers instead a young George who was neary sold. Wtf is this.

Also, no matter how much people don't like Jackson, Maresca made it clear that it was not his decision. Although we got a nice loan fee, it shows it is always about getting money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Vesper said:

Crystal Palace defender Marc Guehi, 25, has informed his advisors he would prefer to join Real Madrid after his summer move to Liverpool collapsed. (Mirror)

Remember months ago when I said we should buy him and some cunts laughed at me? And now he goes to Liverpool or Madrid and becomes a world-class defender. Many of our fans are just as terrible as our board

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Stats said:

Also, no matter how much people don't like Jackson, Maresca made it clear that it was not his decision. Although we got a nice loan fee, it shows it is always about getting money.

It’s painful knowing how we went from spending money without a care in The World in search of success at any means necessary under Roman to this… buy young, loan for a fee yearly or sell as soon as profit is made on that asset with success being a bonus if it happens but not really fussed as long as the players sell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 19/09/2025 at 07:14, OhForAGreavsie said:

This is an important consideration. Not only was it possible to hide these payments from authorities at the time, they were not even discovered when the club came under heightened scrutiny because Russian owned assets were sanctioned. It's clear therefore that such payments can be hidden relatively easily.

This means there is no way to be sure that other clubs have not engaged in the same activity. Indeed, given the competitive nature of the football industry and the insatiable greed of agents, I'm guessing that many, many, clubs are guilty too. If authorities can't find these payments, but are determined to stop them, it would be counterproductive to impose heavy sporting penalties. Doing that would only make clubs all the more determined to keep their mouths shut about their own regulatory breaches.

There must be penalties but I'm guessing that these are much more likely to be financial than they are to be sporting.

In that case we should have just ignored those discretions. Assuming it was not possible for it to come to light .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just on the players i been saying for a long time regarding the players these sd's are bringing in. Half of them are simply not good enough. There's too much reliance on those top quality half a dozen or so players we have and in turn half of them are injured regularly. Its a no win situation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we should wait until the end of the season to decide what is good and what is not. 

I still think they did a good job this summer. 

Especially when they had to balance the books because of UEFA restrictions. 

Last season we started kind of slow, and I expected the same because of the insane summer we had. We might finish the season strong again. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...