Chelsea Transfers

[DH1988 1,348]

1 minute ago, Hamilton said:

Why would they up the bid, they had already lower bid accepted no?

Exactly, we’ll just end up getting into another stupid bidding war and paying ridiculously over the odds, again.

[Pizy 18,879]

Klopp and Liverpool fans may have to be put on suicide watch if we nab Lavia too. For that reason as much as any other I hope we convince him to choose us.

[DH1988 1,348]

If Liverpool think they had £111m for Caicedo then they’ve got money to outbid on Lavia, I’d assume we’d need to offer players and more cash, for the life of me I cannot understand how operating like this is acceptable ie. Not having both bids accepted/signed in tandem.

[lucio 5,418]

We are clearly the better project. Better place to live , better midfield partners , less pressure 

[TheHulk 2,426]

This is hilarious, please match it Chelsea. Loserpool fans suiciding.

Edited August 14, 2023 by TheHulk

[lucio 5,418]

Do we even need to match it , their asking price was 50 and we bid 55

[Mhsc 1,094]

Hilarious how rival fans keep saying that no one would choose Chelsea, it genuinely is the most interesting & exciting project in football atm if you're up and coming but not yet completely world class: great manager, great attacking/progressive football, multi club model for loans with guaranteed football if you're not Chelsea-ready, ambitious long term plans, great directors of football doing some really exciting squad building, tonnes of money behind the project, we churn out the most premier league players of any club, and we have been extremely successful over the last 20 years.

I can understand people picking City over us due to basically guaranteed immediate trophies, but only if they are already world class and slot into that lineup guaranteed. Otherwise, we are the better pick pretty much always fmpov.

[Reddish-Blue 2,497]

Just now, lucio said:

Do we even need to match it , their asking price was 50 and we bid 55

I would assume Southampton is just following Brighton

If Liverpool bid 60 as per other reports, why would Southampton accept 55 from us?   

[KEVINAA 129]

This forum's servers will probably crash when Moisés Caicedo is confirmed by Chelsea because most Ecuadorian fans will be looking to register and login to talkchelsea.

Edited August 14, 2023 by KEVINAA

[lucio 5,418]

4 minutes ago, Reddish-Blue said:

I would assume Southampton is just following Brighton

If Liverpool bid 60 as per other reports, why would Southampton accept 55 from us?   

because he isn't interested in joining liverpool so their bid should be irrelevant, like with caicedo

[YorkshireBlue 3,268]

I think he's deffo Liverpool bound, no questions about it in my mind.

[Duppy Conqueror 1,532]

After this window i think we'll be looking at a steady 2 maybe 3 transfers each summer and less in winter windows. Whilst not all our youth buys will pan out i believe they are bought more to become players for us than just products to sell at a later date so big spending will ease off in the future. They are prepared to pay big when the need is great.but moving forward they know you can't have too many of them.

Getting back to Lavia,is not like we didnt show an interest in him until they did..we bid for him in January. So they making us pay more.it will work out fine.

[Duppy Conqueror 1,532]

6 minutes ago, KEVINAA said:

This forum's servers will probably crash when Moisés Caicedo is confirmed by Chelsea because most Ecuadorian fans will be looking to register and longing to talkchelsea.

The Belgian mafia will return too when we sign Lavia..

[Hamilton 2,120]

 

[DH1988 1,348]

Obligation* PLEASE