Chelsea Transfers

[Special Juan 28,122]

Sarr was never going to feature

[JFKvsNixon 53]

13 minutes ago, Pizy said:

Sarr straight back on loan to Strasbourg. We know that wasn’t the original intention and it comes completely out of the blue. Gave him a squad number and took him on tour.

For this to come out of nowhere I wonder if that means a new defender is coming in? 

Chelsea probably decided to purchase him, before his market value started to increase. Any purchases between two clubs that share ownership have to reflect the fair market value. If they left him at Strasburg for another year, and he continued his improvement, then he may well have cost Chelsea a lot more.

[TheHulk 2,415]

17 minutes ago, Pizy said:

Sarr straight back on loan to Strasbourg. We know that wasn’t the original intention and it comes completely out of the blue. Gave him a squad number and took him on tour.

For this to come out of nowhere I wonder if that means a new defender is coming in? 

Bunch of clowns, why even buy him instead of letting him stay one year more at Strasbourg, now they wasted a loan spot and Anselmino can't go there.

[mkh 572]

Manchester United have identified Benjamin Šeško and Nicolas Jackson as their two main striker targets!

(@SkySportDE)

[Liuxas 124]

Guys out of the topic, but where can I buy green shorts with we played against Palmieras in Club World Cup, can't find anywhere? 

[TheHulk 2,415]

22 minutes ago, mkh said:

Manchester United have identified Benjamin Šeško and Nicolas Jackson as their two main striker targets!

(@SkySportDE)

If we get Fart in return I'd rather keep Michael Jackson as much as I want him gone.

[Pizy 18,864]

The Sesko links with United are strange. Multiple other big PL clubs apparently cooled on him bevause the price was too high. So how would broke ass Man United afford him if the others didn’t want to touch him?

Also, if you’re Leipzig who are about to see a fellow Bundesliga club sell their promising young striker to a PL team for €90-95m why would you agree to a single pound less than that for yours?

I think the Jackson/Garnacho shit feels inevitable. 🫤

[TheHulk 2,415]

2 minutes ago, Pizy said:

The Sesko links with United are strange. Multiple other big PL clubs apparently cooled on him bevause the price was too high. So how would broke ass Man United afford him if the others didn’t want to touch him?

Also, if you’re Leipzig who are about to see a fellow Bundesliga club sell their promising young striker to a PL team for €90-95m why would you agree to a single pound less than that for yours?

I think the Jackson/Garnacho shit feels inevitable. 🫤

Imagine missing out on Simons because of a filth like Garnacho.

[ulvhedin 525]

So are we in for a new CB?

Veiga/Disasi/Gilchrist - to be sold

Sarr/Anselmino - to be loaned out

Acheampong - more fullback then CB

Fofana - won't play more than 10 games

Badiashille - he is terrible

That leaves us with Colwill/Chalobah/Tosin - I know they are capable of great game, but the are not consistent enough, trusting them for PL/CL run is suicidal

[Bluepower777 34]

I dont think this ins and outs is being managed very well, we have so many players that are never going to be included in the squad. What about all the wages for all these unnecessary players. Not to mention as pointed out players not up to the required standards for a top 4 club. I mean why do they bring them in the first place.

Edited July 21 by Bluepower777

[Vesper 30,106]

IF we cannot (and I doubt we can) sell him

I want Sterling sent to the reserves permanently

let him rot for 2 years and then he will have fuckall left in terms of top level football (he will be closing in on 33yo when his contract ends)

that cunt turned down multiple offers from KSA that would have paid the lickrish bitch even more than he is bloodsuckering us for now (thanks Boehly!)

of all the buys he was arguably the worst, when you factor in his £91m in salary, plus the £47.5m in t-fee

£138.5m (almost 190m USD for our American friends here) down the shitter for that rotter

as you can tell, I really do not like him, lol

in the past 10 years, the only Chels player (speaking personal dislike on a human level) I detest more was Lukaku

I have zero against players I do not rate all, like Disasi. He is a fine bloke, stand up fellow, just a shit CB. KDH, wonderful person, just not Chels quality at the end of the day.

But Sterling, from all that I can see, is a right proper twat, same as Rom was.

[ulvhedin 525]

3 minutes ago, Vesper said:

IF we cannot (and I doubt we can) sell him

I want Sterling sent to the reserves permanently

let him rot for 2 years and then he will have fuckall left in terms of top level football (he will be closing in on 33yo when his contract ends)

that cunt turned down multiple offers from KSA that would have paid the lickrish bitch even more than he is bloodsuckering us for now (thanks Boehly!)

of all the buys he was arguably the worst, when you factor in his £91m in salary, plus the £47.5m in t-fee

£138.5m (almost 190m USD for our American friends here) down the shitter for that rotter

as you can tell, I really do not like him, lol

in the past 10 years, the only Chels player (speaking personal dislike on a human level) I detest more was Lukaku

I have zero against players I do not rate all, like Disasi. He is a fine bloke, stand up fellow, just a shit CB. KDH, wonderful person, just not Chels quality at the end of the day.

But Sterling, from all that I can see, is a right proper twat, same as Rom was.

You are going a little bit too extreme, 'that cunt'? we gave him the contract, he doesn't want to move his family to Saudi, perfectly understandable approach by him. We can cuss him out, but it is his right to deny a move, especially to such a country as Saudi.

[Thor 2,690]

I never rated Sterling even during his highs... was really against the move to get him. 

Get what you can for him. Surely at this point he is clever enough to go somewhere he can actually get game time if he is serious about making another run in the England squad. 

If not - fair enough. Its a lot of money salary wise he'd be missing out on. 

[Vesper 30,106]

12 minutes ago, ulvhedin said:

You are going a little bit too extreme, 'that cunt'? we gave him the contract, he doesn't want to move his family to Saudi, perfectly understandable approach by him. We can cuss him out, but it is his right to deny a move, especially to such a country as Saudi.

I am also crazy frustrated that we agreed to pay him that insane salary, and that is on Boehly, and has been of many things that has put us under the cosh of UEFA and their bollocks FFP.

IF he refuses a buy-out, then I absolutely want him in the reserves though.

It is an all-round bad situ.

The best solution is that he agrees a deal (salary-wise) with some other team, then we just make up the difference (for his last 2 years on his contract with us) with a buy-out, plus get a small fee (£20m seems unlikely, but who knows) in terms of a transfer.

[OhForAGreavsie 6,060]

20 minutes ago, Vesper said:

The best solution is that he agrees a deal (salary-wise) with some other team, then we just make up the difference (for his last 2 years on his contract with us) with a buy-out, plus get a small fee (£20m seems unlikely, but who knows) in terms of a transfer.

✅ 

(Free transfer with no further salary contribution by Chelsea also works. Perhaps works better in some ways.)