Jump to content

Chelsea Transfers


Tomo
 Share

Recommended Posts

Mamadou Sarr will be made official by Chelsea soon. Enzo Maresca will evaluate the centre back at the Club World Cup, before deciding if he stays or goes back to Strasbourg on loan.

(@lequipe)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, mkh said:

Mamadou Sarr will be made official by Chelsea soon. Enzo Maresca will evaluate the centre back at the Club World Cup, before deciding if he stays or goes back to Strasbourg on loan.

(@lequipe)

He is good?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last summer we started a new trend of going from 0 to full announcement on random names so I'm not listening that much to rumours

My guess is some name(s) we've no idea about at this moment will be the real signings and most of what we see in the press is just agents paying for PR

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Special Juan said:

Confirmed by Ornstein Sancho is not joining we will pay 5M to United

Smart from us, very smart we need better than him

Were signing Gittens or Fart instead of him so not sure how smart we are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was fine with Sancho staying or going. But fuck sake, if we actually sign Gittens for £50m to replace him. 
 

A 15th placed, broke, club in absolute shambles Man United are going to have more ambitious targets than us after finishing in the UCL and winning a trophy. 🤦‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Pizy said:

I was fine with Sancho staying or going. But fuck sake, if we actually sign Gittens for £50m to replace him. 
 

A 15th placed, broke, club in absolute shambles Man United are going to have more ambitious targets than us after finishing in the UCL and winning a trophy. 🤦‍♂️

Lol lets wait until the end of the transfer window

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Mário César said:

Lol lets wait until the end of the transfer window

I’d take Mbeumo a million times over Gittens or Garnacho. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Just received a BBC notification that we are sending Sancho back to ManU and paying what the report describes as a penalty. I heard one journo describe the payment as just the agreed loan fee, and not an additional penalty clause at all.

I confess that I had wondered if we might try to turn a profit on Sancho by doing a back-to-back buy from United and sell to X deal. In reality that was daft of me because United and club X would make sure that couldn't happen.

Since the original report claims that we've passed on Sancho because we failed to agree terms with him, I have to say that I don't really blame him for holding out. Although he's relatively young he has to face the reality that, outside of moving to Saudi, he will never get another contract to match his current deal with United. That being so, it makes sense not to give up that contract without a payoff or matching terms from his new employer.

Edited by OhForAGreavsie
Updated to take account of the report of the reason we did not sign Sancho.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You