Jump to content

Super Frank Thread


 Share

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Mana said:

Lampard took Derby to the Championship play-off final, and a great number of Chelsea fans assumed he'd do brilliantly with us. They were wrong so far as well.

Lampard had a chance to win the Super Cup. Failed (you can say we were better than Pool that game, but in a cup-tied game, just playing better isn't the answer).

Lampard had a chance to win the FA Cup against a very poor Arsenal side. Failed. (Boy, Lampard has a poor record with finals so far...)

Lampard scraped a top 4 finish, while having more lives than a cat. Just about achieving the bare minimum.

This season, we are already out of the Carabao Cup.

10 years ago, Wenger said "4th place is like winning a trophy." Every single one of us laughed at that comment. Now today, we are celebrating it. The fecking standards have lowered in this football club.

This isn't about Lampard but judging by your constant and relentless moaning about things, I don't think you will ever be happy with any manager unless he wins every game and every trophy available. Experienced manager at the helm or not, you always have something to moan and cry about and heck, maybe even want him out after a loss or two. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mana said:

Are you implying we should have the same standards as Southampton? Have we sunk that low that we are comparing Southampton? Southampton can afford to give him time because 1) Prior to that defeat, overall he was giving Southampton life and 2) They may not find anybody else. And Hasenhüttl has more experience and more qualified than Lampard.

Hasenhüttl's redemption is something to admire, but it's similar to Eddie Howe's massive achievement with Bournemouth seasons ago.

Let's be real, any other top club would have sacked him. A team like Barca losing 9-0 will be headlines across the world. Barely anyone outside the UK knows Southampton, so while it was a club embarrassment it wasn't international.

But back to Hasenhüttl. Do I believe our squad would perform better with him? Absolutely. Hasenhüttl is overachieving with Southampton. If he had more quality players, he will give top 4 a proper run for its money. Lampard is underachieving with our players.

And last season it pissed me off people here had the gall to compare Lamps to the big names of Klopp and Pep. He is nowhere NEAR their level. Lampard's level is Arteta and Ole. That's his level. Just like those two clowns, he is underachieving with the players he has got. We shouldn't be losing back to back, which were both piss poor performances.

 

So kloop losing to Aston villa 7 to 2? 

Your worry so much about one or two results but even the best it can go wrong. 

Overall Lampard is doing well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mana said:

*facepalm* Oh brother, seriously? Is that all you took from that?!

Klopp losing 7-2 was an embarrassment to Liverpool. But they stuck by him. Why is that? Because Klopp has a positive style of play everybody wants and loves and just won the PL. Even though Liverpool lost 7-2, they are top of the league right now. The Villa defeat has been overshadowed. These "one or two" results for Chelsea will not be overshadowed unless by some miracle we are challenging for the title.

P.S. - You are the second person to tell me "2 bad results and you scream". Where have you been since Lampard was here. It's MORE than two bad results.

So you freaking out for 2 bad results is not the same? 

You forget the entire picture? 

Even before those two games analysts like carraggher where saying how we have recruited well. How we are setting up for the future.

And that at this moment is more important. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mana said:

What is the entire picture? Is this equivalent to "trust the process" I keep seeing with Ole and Arteta?

We recruited well, yes. That I can agree on. But what is that translating to right now? I don't care about the future, I care about now. What's happening now? If I see good things happening constantly on the pitch, I won't be fuming and would have agreed we will get better in the future. But 3 defeats and 4 uninspiring draws is not making me believe.

That is the problem, when you focus on the now with younger players and new players it will take time. 

Right now we have suffered a dipped in form which was expected. But I will see how we finish the season, what buys we do in January and go from there. And then take an overall approach to what we have. 

Right now we have a mix, good buys, young players, dip in form. What is the real deal? I suggest we will know by the end. 

But one thing is for sure, we are building something good that even if Lampard goes in the summer, we will attract a top coach like naggelsmam, Pochetino etc etc.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, communicate said:

Hmm so should we sell puli and ziyech then

Apart from Pulisic, all the other attacking players were bought by Lampard (Pulisic is now part of the plan anyway). Different circumstances have meant we have not been able to have Werner, Pulisic, Ziyech, Havertz all available and fit at the same time but Lampard has gotta find a way of making this work since he got what he wanted. If not, questions will be asked, if not already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The sober view imo is to see on the one hand that two loses to Everton and wolves isn't the end of the world. Everton we had no wingers against a back 5 that sat deep and have away an early sloppy goal. Quite a common type of defeat even for big teams. Wolves was poor game management. Of course, many players had poor performances too but that happens sometimes.

On the other hand, there's nothing from our previous good run that tells is much about how good we will be for the rest of the season. We beat cannon fodder. Leeds was the probably the best result and their style suits us down to the ground!

Now we have a run where we play the teams in the top half which should reveal how good we are. Defensive shit housery like against united and sevilla won't cut it. At least we had moments in the spurs game which was better. It would help if we had werner, kai, ziyech and pulisic all on the pitch at the same time. Then its all on frank.

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just saw this and not surprised at all. In half PL games we did not create anything from open play. And midfield is our biggest problem which is surprising considering that common opinion is that Kova and Mount are great.

What do we expect from our number 8s? I think Kai is not for that role and it will not work.

We want to fight for title with this? We play the same formation as City but lets compare with them. They had David Silva and KDB for that role and they had 17 goals and 27 assists in 17/18 season when City won title with 100 points (Pep second season).

We have Kova who has one assist against SU, Kai one assist against WBA and Mount 2 corners. Also these 3 players scored just 2 goals. Huge difference.

I am still advocating that we need to move Ziyech to number 8 role. He played more games in his career as MF then RW. Pep did this with B. Silva as well?

Or change formation and play Kai as number 10 and wait for him.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mana said:

What is the entire picture? Is this equivalent to "trust the process" I keep seeing with Ole and Arteta?

No one is saying blindly "trust the process", you should look at a few factors and then make your decision from there. For me I look at these things whenever a manager struggles initially to decide whether I back him or not.

1. Is the football sustainable? Yes and the underlying performance metrics back that up.

2. What are his team's selections like? In other words is he playing the players that are/have potential to be a part of our next title winning team and dropping the deadwood that forced us into a transition in the first place? Yes.

3. Recruitment, are most of the players brought in good signings that have improved us? Yes.

4. Is there season by season progression? Again yes, up on the same fixtures last season, improved performance in the CL group compared to last year and most importantly we look better at both ends.

I'll be the first to call him out if he stalls on as much as one of those things but in my opinion those are the four things to look at in the building phases and as of this minute he's passing all four (compared to Arteta who's failing on them all).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Incorrect, we have less points right now than we did last season. Last season this time we had 26 points. We have 22 right now.

This CL group we had was way easier compared to last season's. Last season we had Ajax and Valencia. Last season was actually more impressive that we got out of that group.

 

 

Depends how you define improvement. Last season we were eleven points behind Liverpool at this stage, while we are now only 6 points behind Liverpool. In that sense, it is clearly an improvement/progression

 

Gesendet von meinem VOG-L29 mit Tapatalk

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last season he did not realize full season that Rudiger-Zouma is our best CB pairing. 4 or 5 games last season and this season Newcastle, Krasnodar and Sevilla. All clean sheets with them.

He needed 6 months to start playing Giroud over Michy. That was a joke. Michy is 3rd striker now even in Palace.

This season playing Mount as a winger and later Werner is in that category as well of unreasonable decisions. Remember when Puli was on the pitch playing on the right and Mount on the left?

We had winning run as much impressive if not even more last season in Sep-Oct.

As mentioned we have less points this season. I do not see that improvement. Even if you can find something it is because we have much better squad. Nothing to do with Frank.

Our defense is better? Hallo! Mendy, Silva, Chilwell. And new coach. 

Now when we played without wingers he did not change formation which would be worth praising and reasonable but he played Kai and Timo out of position. That costed us points.

His approach in games like UTD and Spurs was weird as well. It was like we are playing CL semi final first leg away...

He even admitted that we have individual quality upfront and we will score goals. That is his solution? Where is the system? 

You can already see Kai will never work as number 8 but he will continue will that. Or will realize after 6 months as usual...

I bet when he sent Barkley on loan he did not knew that just one month later he will change from 4231 to 433 which would open place for Ross. And lets be honest, he is better in the final 3rd then what we have.

This is just a small part of negativities I see.

I would be the first one to praise him when he impress but I do not see it. Even a little.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You