Jump to content
Join Talk Chelsea and log in to join the CFC discussion! ×

Krzysztof Piatek

Unionjack

By Unionjack,
in Transfer Archives

 Share

Recommended Posts

Magic Lamps

Magic Lamps 11,692

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Vesper said:

What about Werner? He will be even more expensive, and Bayern are buzzing around for years. He would maybe be the surest bet.

I like Jovic the best of the first three.

Me 2. Jovic is the full package. Quick, combative, cool as ice in front of goal, can finish with his head, both feet, cleanly and dirty but only in the box. 

Werner is available in summer but i  guess Bayern already have a pre-contract with him. If not he will got to Liverpool for sure. I think we have a really thin chance only if the others fuck it up somehow. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 223
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Fernando
Fernando

So we get a declining higuain and Milan get a young upcoming striker in piatek?  Makes sense, just like about every single thing this club does.... 

Vesper
Vesper

40m euros is literally HALF of what Bournemouth want for Callum Wilson. Cannot believe we are not all over this. 

Vesper
Vesper

If Piątek or Haller or Jovic are too big for CFC to buy, we are so doomed.

Posted Images

the wes

the wes 7,212

Posted
Posted
29 minutes ago, Vesper said:

What about Werner? He will be even more expensive, and Bayern are buzzing around for years. He would maybe be the surest bet.

 

We should offer £50m + CHO with a buy Back clause problem solved with a new striker and with CHO wanting to leave with  buy back clause in his transfer deal 😃😃 but that's to smart for our board to do 😠😠😠

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Alabama

Alabama 1,992

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, the wes said:

We should offer £50m + CHO with a buy Back clause problem solved with a new striker and with CHO wanting to leave with  buy back clause in his transfer deal 😃😃 but that's to smart for our board to do 😠😠😠

Lol...

Even at that m sure RB Leipzig will surely reject that offer...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Vesper

Vesper 30,091

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, eemanyooel said:

Lol...

Even at that m sure RB Leipzig will surely reject that offer...

Yes, they are a buy low sell high club

I would LOVE to prise away CB Dayot Upamecano from them, but I think they slapped a  90 to 100m euro price on him (I think they would  take £70-5m perhaps, but even that is more than we will drop on a CB, I bet Marina would even turn down de Ligt for £70m, lolol)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Alabama

Alabama 1,992

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Vesper said:

Yes, they are a buy low sell high club

I would LOVE to prise away CB Dayot Upamecano from them, but I think they slapped a  90 to 100m euro price on him (I think they would  take £70-5m perhaps, but even that is more than we will drop on a CB, I bet Marina would even turn down de Ligt for £70m, lolol)

Lol...

Maybe Marina has been tasting what Sarri is smoking...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Magic Lamps

Magic Lamps 11,692

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, Vesper said:

40m euros is literally HALF of what Bournemouth want for Callum Wilson.

Cannot believe we are not all over this. 

40m € is indeed a gift. The board is obviously too stupid to realize that opp. In summer Real and Juve will be all over him

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Superblue

Superblue 6,372

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Unionjack said:

Please SOMEBODY convince me there is a downside to buying him as I need to tell it to myself when he sods off to a competitor

The risk of him being a one season wonder?

40m euros for a player that cost only 4m six months ago represents a huge risk in my opinion. I'm certainly not saying he can't keep scoring goals and wouldn't keep scoring goals at a bigger club or in a different league but so far this is all being based on half a season, of which he had a huge goal scoring spurt at the start of the season. I believe he has only scored 4 goals in the last 12 league games - is this back to what would be considered his standard level of a goal every 3 games? I'm not sure.

I'm not knocking his potential and he could develop into one of the best strikers in Europe, but I would far rather see a longer period of performance before a decision was made on him. Unfortunately the way the transfer market is now is ridiculous and teams will be happy to risk that amount of money on a player based on such a short period of form (Bakayoko springs to mind).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Antonio8

Antonio8 736

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, eemanyooel said:

Because Sarri would rather want a fast declining fat 31 yes old past it striker...why Sarri wants Higuain that bad is beyond my comprehension....

because he scored 36 goals in 35 matches in his system (that could be reproduced with hazard and pedro)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Alabama

Alabama 1,992

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, Antonio8 said:

because he scored 36 goals in 35 matches in his system (that could be reproduced with hazard and pedro)

Reason we are after is Sarri...when we are suppose to invest in a young quality striker...see now seems Piatek is getting off the market

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You

Sure, let me in!
Enter