Jump to content

Ross Barkley


milllz
 Share

Recommended Posts

Better dribbler, better technique, better passer, better vision, better built.

I don't even know why you're comparing the two. One is a destroyer and the other is an attacking midfielder.

All of this, pretty much.

Plus, he can put in a tackle without fouling and won't get suspended numerous times per season for petulance or violent conduct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why signing him? because he's English? if we sign an AM, we should sign Rues who's 10 times better. he'll even cost less probably.

We really need English players for FFP long term wise.

JT, Cole and Lampard leaving us soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find this a very unlikely transfer. He's not ready for a team like Chelsea, he should spend at least another year at Everton for his own good, imo. Plus, for our system I would much rather MVG or even the rumored Paulinho (who I am against signing, for the record). He's an excellent prospect but I would NOT play Ross in a two man midfield.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would he be a viable option next to Matic? If so, I'm all for signing him because he undoubtedly has a lot of qualities and will only improve with age but as an attacking midfielder I think we're already set unless we sell Oscar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We really need English players for FFP long term wise.

JT, Cole and Lampard leaving us soon.

you dont need to spend so much for that reason on a player that isnt a top class AM. If we change someting in the AM, we should had pure quality like Rues. Oscar and Willian are better than Barkley in the 10 role so he isnt needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you dont need to spend so much for that reason on a player that isnt a top class AM. If we change someting in the AM, we should had pure quality like Rues, Oscar and Willian are better the Barkley in the 10 role.

The rumours are that we'd swap Lukaku for him, which I personally wouldn't mind so much especially if Lukaku doesn't want to stay here as 2nd choice striker. If that's the case Lukaku for Barkley is a good deal, and Mourinho can mould into any midfielder he wants him to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think he can be groomed into a lampard-like #8 role, has all the attributes for it...

We cant make that gamble, not in our situation. We need to make the right calls in this moment, more than ever. getting Barkley to be the CM next to Matic and let him grow in to it is a hugh gamble we shouldnt make. We should stop buying every talented prospect when we want to be the best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think he can be groomed into a lampard-like #8 role, has all the attributes for it...

For that you'd need a a system with a three-man midfield. Lampard himself can't play adequately in our current system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

honestly we dont need him

we got so many AM out on loan. piazon? atsu, traore are all exciting prospects.

the only advantage barkley have over them is EPL experience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

maybe he was the player Jose was talking about earlier on in the season. I would wait a year anyway. Doesn't look like anyone else is going to sign him either

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You