Jump to content

N'Golo Kante


Vybz Kartel
 Share

Recommended Posts

an absolute gem of a player and human being, im so glad he's playing for us. Madrid, Barca, Bayern, etc can all fuck off and stay away from Kante, he's here to stay for many years hopefully.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still can't believe how lucky we are to have this guy. 

Despite the injuries I will still keep for him for many years. 

Makelele when he came to us was still useful despite his age. 

Kante can be here and be important to us for many years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

⁹To be fair its a 2 way street. Deschamps will complain as Giroud is his number 1 striker most times and isnt playing regularly enough and Frank will complain because Ngolo was there despite being injured. This is nothing new in regards to international and club football clashing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Tomo said:

Little different.

Lampard's genuinely concerned for Kante's welfare whereas Deschamps wants us to drop our top scorer to accomodate one of his player's.

Id say its pretty similar in a way. Just concerns about playing time.

Lampard is concerned because he wants Kante 100% fit to play most weeks for us and Deschamps needs Giroud to play regularly so he is 100% match fit come the international games as he is his man upfront and can justify playing him. Yeah its maybe not as black and white as that and there is a bit of a grey area but at the end of the day, nobody gets exactly what they want everytime with these quarrals you do hear of between NTs and clubs from time to time, both just have to try and work at it until they meet a compromise. Franks looking out for our interests and Deschamps is looking out for France NTs interests. Kante and Giroud are in the middle of it, wouldnt matter whatever player it was its just difference in opinions based on the interest of the club and their NT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, OneMoSalah said:

Id say its pretty similar in a way. Just concerns about playing time.

Lampard is concerned because he wants Kante 100% fit to play most weeks for us and Deschamps needs Giroud to play regularly so he is 100% match fit come the international games as he is his man upfront and can justify playing him. Yeah its maybe not as black and white as that and there is a bit of a grey area but at the end of the day, nobody gets exactly what they want everytime with these quarrals you do hear of between NTs and clubs from time to time, both just have to try and work at it until they meet a compromise. Franks looking out for our interests and Deschamps is looking out for France NTs interests. Kante and Giroud are in the middle of it, wouldnt matter whatever player it was its just difference in opinions based on the interest of the club and their NT.

Lampard acknowledged Deschamps' comments on Giroud but he is upset over France's treatment of Kante after discovering he got injured at Iceland. It's one thing to joke over the playing time of a player but it's another to not take a player's injury seriously. We don't know what the club medics and France's discussed obviously but why was Kante not released after he picked up the injury against Iceland? What was the point of having him on the bench against Turkey? That is what Lampard's not happy about. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jason said:

Lampard acknowledged Deschamps' comments on Giroud but he is upset over France's treatment of Kante after discovering he got injured at Iceland. It's one thing to joke over the playing time of a player but it's another to not take a player's injury seriously. We don't know what the club medics and France's discussed obviously but why was Kante not released after he picked up the injury against Iceland? What was the point of having him on the bench against Turkey? That is what Lampard's not happy about. 

And maybe then Deschamps still wanted him around the group? Who knows?

I can still see it from both views, Kante is a likeable character as much as a top top player maybe keeping him around the squad was something he felt was good for them.

Lampard obviously is annoyed yes but again, if it was the other way around? Its just one of them things.

Wouldnt get too hung up on it, they wont play an injured player and the NT has a medical team too. Theres nothing to say France arent taking that injury serious, I mean did they make him train? Did they want to play him? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OneMoSalah said:

And maybe then Deschamps still wanted him around the group? Who knows?

I can still see it from both views, Kante is a likeable character as much as a top top player maybe keeping him around the squad was something he felt was good for them.

Kante is likable character but if Deschamps needed him around to keep the France squad atmosphere good...then christ, maybe he's got a bigger issue!

1 hour ago, OneMoSalah said:

Lampard obviously is annoyed yes but again, if it was the other way around? Its just one of them things.

Wouldnt get too hung up on it, they wont play an injured player and the NT has a medical team too. Theres nothing to say France arent taking that injury serious, I mean did they make him train? Did they want to play him? 

He trained away from the main squad before the Turkey game. If they won't play an INJURED player, then why didn't they just release him? Could have returned a few days earlier and worked with the club physios to get him back fit rather than wasting time with France knowing he's injured and won't be playing. And it wasn't like France were short on numbers either. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Juventus remain interested in Chelsea midfielder N’Golo Kante who played under current Bianconeri boss Maurizio Sarri last season, reports Calciomercato.

However, the Premier League side would demand £100m to part with the Frenchman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spanish outlet El Desmarque reports today Florentino Perez has offered Chelsea’s N’Golo Kante as a possibility for the Real Madrid manager.

http://sportwitness.co.uk/chelsea-player-presented-alternative-paul-pogba-club-willing-spend-e120m/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You