The Conte Thread

[Tomo 21,733]

21 hours ago, Jason said:

I agree that Conte's cup record isn't the best (excluding the Champions League) but his 4 defeats did come against Napoli, Roma, Lazio and Arsenal. Just find it strange he can get the better of them in the league but not in the cup.

Big away games has always been an issue for him.

I thnk the bad cup manager is a bit exaggerated, i mean yes he hasn't won one yet but would you call Atletico or us circa 04-11 a bad CL team?

[Jase 43,479]

4 minutes ago, Tomo said:

Big away games has always been an issue for him.

To be fair, that's a big issue for us too. The only big away game we seem to win more often than not is Arsenal. Otherwise we rarely win at Spurs, City, Liverpool and United.

[Tomo 21,733]

1 minute ago, Jason said:

To be fair, that's a big issue for us too. The only big away game we seem to win more often than not is Arsenal. Otherwise we rarely win at Spurs, City, Liverpool and United.

Conte can't seem to crack Arsenal, even at The Bridge they had 3 serious chances plus there goal. Ancelotti, Jose, Hiddink and even Rafa had Wenger by the balls and knew how to stop Arsenal playing, i love the playing out of the back system we have but vs team's on the quality of Arsenal and above we need to scrap it, we did it at Anfield and Liverpool couldn't hurt us.

[BlueLyon 9,359]

30 minutes ago, Tomo said:

Conte can't seem to crack Arsenal, even at The Bridge they had 3 serious chances plus there goal. Ancelotti, Jose, Hiddink and even Rafa had Wenger by the balls and knew how to stop Arsenal playing, i love the playing out of the back system we have but vs team's on the quality of Arsenal and above we need to scrap it, we did it at Anfield and Liverpool couldn't hurt us.

All the details away, we played with same formation and same 11 we did for most of this season and we usualy did very well. Not a single injury. 

If anyone, the players let him down big time. Such shit attitude from everyone, including regular guys like Azpi or Kante. There is not much Conte can do when Eden, Diego, Kante, etc play so poorly. Nevermind that brainfart from Moses. 

And if we need to adjust whole team to crack THAT Arsenal team, let Ramsey and Xhaka walk over us, then we need some serious improvements.

Conte did deserve some stick for few games, but yesterday the players simply didnt turn up. You could see it from sky. It had nothing to do from Conte motivations, they simply went on holidays last week and didnt return.

Edit: A while ago, I said this team could very well be overachieving this season. Double would kinda hide it, but now its clear for everyone we need improvements. If we dont get some serious investment this year, we never will. And bottom line, Conte is proven league winner guy, so we will likely be competitive there next season. About CL, either Conte will make it there too, or at the least he will create great team for whoever else replaces him eventualy, like he did at Juve. At least I hope that.

[the wes 7,212]

The similarities between Antonio Conte's debut seasons at Juventus and Chelsea

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/row-zed/similarities-between-antonio-contes-debut-10519927

That's freaky 

[zekinjo 449]

He just needs to be backed by the board, start attracting top quality players and I won't have any doubts about his long term dynasty here.

[The Chels 2,502]

4 seasons is enough evidence in my eyes.

Conte consistently struggles in cup competitions and big (away) games (and so I certainly wouldn't have high hopes for the CL), but he is extremely good at flat-track bullying his way to the league title and that alone makes him a very useful asset, mind.

[Tomo 21,733]

49 minutes ago, The Chels said:

4 seasons is enough evidence in my eyes.

Conte consistently struggles in cup competitions and big (away) games (and so I certainly wouldn't have high hopes for the CL), but he is extremely good at flattrack bullying his way to the league and that still makes him a very useful asset, mind.

Ill be happy with that if Conte is staying for the longish term, league is the bread and butter and law of averages will get us a cup eventually, hopefully the CL. Although hiring a coach who's previous team's have a good record in cup's and has good tactical pedigree can't do any harm, what's Carlos Quieroz upto these days?

[coolhead23 1,146]

My only criticism about Conte (more like an observation) ... In the Arsenal game just like the United one, Conte didnt really have any answers on the pitch ... he normally is all expressive even when we are down but particularly in these games he just went into a zone like he has given up, he went quiet (not his usual self). If this down to lack of idea then he will need to raise his level because next season everyone will know how Chelsea plays and they will come up with good counter strategy. 

I might be wrong in my observation and hope he does a plan B/plan C already. Next season will be brutal and with lot of expectations. 

[communicate 2,703]

1 hour ago, coolhead23 said:

My only criticism about Conte (more like an observation) ... In the Arsenal game just like the United one, Conte didnt really have any answers on the pitch ... he normally is all expressive even when we are down but particularly in these games he just went into a zone like he has given up, he went quiet (not his usual self). If this down to lack of idea then he will need to raise his level because next season everyone will know how Chelsea plays and they will come up with good counter strategy. 

I might be wrong in my observation and hope he does a plan B/plan C already. Next season will be brutal and with lot of expectations. 

So what should he have done ? 

Play different formation ?? No

Press Arsenal against fast player like welbeck ?? No

Play Fabregas ? Against ozil and sanchez ? No

 

[coolhead23 1,146]

44 minutes ago, communicate said:

So what should he have done ? 

Play different formation ?? No

Press Arsenal against fast player like welbeck ?? No

Play Fabregas ? Against ozil and sanchez ? No

 

So nothing can be done at all ... is that what your saying ... So just sit and watch your team crumble!!! Seriously!!! 

As far as what could be done ... Well yes he could have tried a different formation (everyone knows how we play now), changing Hazard instead of Pedro would had been a better option, starting with Fabregas ... etc, etc 

All i m saying it is not a good sign where a top manager doesnt have an answer or a counter strategy (if that was the case) ... he will need to work on that (that be a scope for improvement) ... Next season will be tough and everyone would had micro-analysed us, so we will need to be push up our readiness level. 

 

[Polo7 3,496]

56 minutes ago, coolhead23 said:

So nothing can be done at all ... is that what your saying ... So just sit and watch your team crumble!!! Seriously!!! 

As far as what could be done ... Well yes he could have tried a different formation (everyone knows how we play now), changing Hazard instead of Pedro would had been a better option, starting with Fabregas ... etc, etc 

All i m saying it is not a good sign where a top manager doesnt have an answer or a counter strategy (if that was the case) ... he will need to work on that (that be a scope for improvement) ... Next season will be tough and everyone would had micro-analysed us, so we will need to be push up our readiness level. 

 

Arsenal had no choice but to win that game. The difference in desire between the two teams was very apparent. Even if Fabregas started, I doubt we could have won. They were all over us. 

[coolhead23 1,146]

3 minutes ago, Polo7 said:

Arsenal had no choice but to win that game. The difference in desire between the two teams was very apparent. Even if Fabregas started, I doubt we could have won. They were all over us. 

Come on, Mate ... We had the double on the line which makes us equally motivated. All i saying, I hope we dont have such moments where we are clueless ... because next season will be even more tough for us. Whether Fabregas starting would had made a difference, maybe yes ... change in tactics works 

[Fernando 6,453]

12 minutes ago, coolhead23 said:

Come on, Mate ... We had the double on the line which makes us equally motivated. All i saying, I hope we dont have such moments where we are clueless ... because next season will be even more tough for us. Whether Fabregas starting would had made a difference, maybe yes ... change in tactics works 

We was clueless a couple of times and Conte changed it the next games. 

Remember losing to Arsenal, United and such. 

So I don't have problem with this aspect. He is flexible as shown this season. 

[akgw13 867]

The players heads were not in it, that was readily apparent. They were so hyper focused and stressed during the season that once we locked up the league players mentally and physically switch off and enjoy after such a long season. It is a shame we didn't win the FA cup and that ridiculous first goal the ref allowed really hurt us but NOBODY was interested in playing another meaningful game after WBA. Criticizing Contes approach is not fair, there is nothing a coach can do tactically if the players don't show up. Clearly the players were not motivated.

 

[MrExcalibur100 7,124]

If he started the line up he did minus John Terry, I'm confident we will have won the game. The team was handicapped from the start. We aren't Madrid or Bayern with interchangeable players were you can afford to make 4 or 5 changes to the line-up or make errors with team selection and not pay for it. Conte made a mistake. Time to move on. 

[manpe 10,861]

3 hours ago, coolhead23 said:

Come on, Mate ... We had the double on the line which makes us equally motivated.

I would contest that thought. Don't mix up our, fans, motivation with the players'. We had achieved our objective, which was to vindicate last season and to ultimately win the league as the season progressed. Super motivation and desire was on display almost every game. They didn't have enough push for the FA Cup because they had already done what they aimed to do, with the cup being only a bonus. Stress levels dropped, they didn't have enough pressure to get that extra that would make the difference.

Arsenal, on the other, had a trainwreck of a season. Out of top 4 for the first time since who knows when, humiliated in CL, fans being unanimously vocal against the team and the club, Wenger in/out saga and so on. This was literally their last saving grace to show others that they aren't complete bottlers, their pride as professionals above all was at stake. And they played as such, against a team that didn't need this win.

[Supermonkey92 1,428]

Conte can do little. Our team is crap. Don't get me wrong we have some top quality players. Courtois, Azpi, Kante, and Hazard are our top tier players. Pedro, Willian and Fabregas the tier below. Then there is a significant drop. The formation was a huge factor in our league title. Azpi, Kante, Hazard and Costa were all in positions that suite them. Pedro and Willian gave each other competition. Fabregas kills games in the second half. 

But it also makes our crap players less crap. Let's not forget how bad Cahill is. He was the fault for goals in consecutive games leading up to the formation change. When Luiz plays in a back back four, you saw how easy it was to concede. Matic is only in the team because of how liable cesc is to get past. Apart from that he is pretty useless. Moses can't defend or attack. But he is direct. His directness was effective especially when we still had Brana as a reminder he could be dropped. Alonso is slow, painfully so and almost never has a winger in his pocket. His performances as a lb in a back four are pretty embarrassing. 

Conte found the best suit. But outside of changing matic for cesc and pedro for willian, his hands are tied. No replacement for Alonso, Moses or Kante. The defence is still shoddy. That is why we have 3 cbs!! 

So in the FA Cup final he was right not to start cesc on such a huge pitch, with Ozil and Sanchez running behind him. What do you actually think Conte should have played with a back four? Dont make me laugh! It would have been embarrassing. 

I think he should have played 2 strikers to press the 3 defenders. Costa and Pedro. Bring on fabregas as part of a midfield 3. But that would mean bringing Hazard off. A difficult decision and one that seems easy in hindsight.