Jump to content

Alexandre Pato


KleyLima
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Spike said:

 

He isn't a striker primarily. Only on FIFA is he a centre forward. He is a  wide forward, usually on the left.

 

http://www.whoscored.com/Players/23158

No I get that for sure, he's played most of his games on the left. This is precisely why I think we're interested because of his ability to play in different roles. More of an Auxiliary striker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 825
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

35 minutes ago, Chelsea4 said:

Pato could be a good signing. 

 

Could be.  But, if he's primarily an aux striker who can play out on the left, 433 would suit him better.  Same with Pedro.  Not so much LM like we use.

I'd love for us to give 433 a shot, but...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://espn.uol.com.br/noticia/570253_agora-com-pato-na-mira-chelsea-e-um-verdadeiro-cemiterio-de-atacantes

According to ESPN Brasil correspondent based in UK, he believes Pato's staff is creating the whole thing and he doesn't believe Chelsea is really interested, and only a deal on loan would be possible.

I hope its true. Pato doesn't many any sense.

Team with Oscar+Pato. What a nightmare. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Henrique said:

http://espn.uol.com.br/noticia/570253_agora-com-pato-na-mira-chelsea-e-um-verdadeiro-cemiterio-de-atacantes

According to ESPN Brasil correspondent based in UK, he believes Pato's staff is creating the whole thing and he doesn't believe Chelsea is really interested, and only a deal on loan would be possible.

I hope its true. Pato doesn't many any sense.

Team with Oscar+Pato. What a nightmare. 

The google translate version of that link is great:

Now with duck in the sights, Chelsea is a true 'cemetery attackers'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wanted him so much before he went to Milan. I think this would be an okay move if it means falcao gets thrown back to Monaco and if it's a loan with an option to buy if he does well. 50k euro is relatively small(if the rumours are true) and fitting for a third striker that can play wide for extra squad depth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Henrique said:

http://espn.uol.com.br/noticia/570253_agora-com-pato-na-mira-chelsea-e-um-verdadeiro-cemiterio-de-atacantes

According to ESPN Brasil correspondent based in UK, he believes Pato's staff is creating the whole thing and he doesn't believe Chelsea is really interested, and only a deal on loan would be possible.

I hope its true. Pato doesn't many any sense.

Team with Oscar+Pato. What a nightmare. 

That was my first impression until I seen Lance! reporting it too.  And a guy on Twitter who is based in Brazil with many followers called Cynegeticus said the original report by whoever from ESPNBrazil is a reliable guy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Fernando said:

I rather get Chicharito then this guy.

But if we get him then if the wages and fees is low then that's a low risk gamble.

There's no point signing Chicharito, he would be ineligible to play for another club as he has already played for two clubs (United and Leverkusen) this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

#Corinthians Director Eduardo Ferreira: "Pato will not travel due to trading. From what I understand and heard, negotiations are advanced"

#Corinthians Director Eduardo Ferreira: "There are European club and Asian club sending proposed to Pato in the last days."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, OhForAGreavsie said:

This is just the equivalent of the Oscar is tired nonsense. It's the sort of thing people say when they either do not want to be frank about a player because they are trying to sell him or else they are not prepared to accept the truth. The truth is that, Pato is useless. Stupid signing if it happens.

P.S. Just to answer the rather reasonable question some may want to ask, I have not seen Pato kick a ball in Brazil. I did see him play for Milan however. His reputation is all smoke and mirrors.

Your  "PS" just made all your opinion irrelevant lmao.

It would be an excuse if Pato hasnt returned his football in SPFC.

Sorry but I am tired of people posting about things they dont know shit about

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, ChelseaFanUK said:

That was my first impression until I seen Lance! reporting it too.  And a guy on Twitter who is based in Brazil with many followers called Cynegeticus said the original report by whoever from ESPNBrazil is a reliable guy

Lance! is the Brazilian version of Goal, Daily Mail or The Sun. Anything but reliable.

Also, will you seriously give credit to a a twitter account named Cynegeticus?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You