The Mourinho Thread

[lionsden 4,689]

He just branded the decision by the FA "a disgrace". a leopard never changes its spot SMH. he will never learn/change. I hope they increase future ban/punishment if he continues on the same path.

[Special Juan 28,119]

He just branded the decision by the FA "a disgrace". a leopard never changes its spot SMH.

Oh the fucking irony.

[KevinAshburner 1,270]

Roman Abramovich PULL THE FUCKING TRIGGER ALREADY.

HOW MUCH MORE DO YOU WANT MOURINHO TO DAMAGE THE IMAGE OF OUR CHELSEA FC CLUB. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.

MY NEW YEARS EVE AND NEW YEARS DAY WILL COME EARLY. IF CHELSEA SACK MOURINHO BEFORE DECEMBER 2015 /JANUARY 2016.

HURRY UP ROMAN. I DON'T KNOW HOW MUCH MORE I CAN TAKE OF MOURINHO.

[LDN Blue 7,903]

Absolutely agree with Mourinho's rage at the FA. No consistency in their decision making process at all, I suppose they're going be agreeing with UEFA's decision to back Platini too

[kmk108 1,186]

He just branded the decision by the FA "a disgrace". a leopard never changes its spot SMH. he will never learn/change. I hope they increase future ban/punishment if he continues on the same path.

It is a disgrace

[Steve 10,227]

He just branded the decision by the FA "a disgrace". a leopard never changes its spot SMH. he will never learn/change. I hope they increase future ban/punishment if he continues on the same path.

Everything he said was exactly spot on. How is anything he said wrong?

[Johnnyeye 7,501]

He just branded the decision by the FA "a disgrace". a leopard never changes its spot SMH. he will never learn/change. I hope they increase future ban/punishment if he continues on the same path.

So Mourinho isn´t allowed to defend himself or the club?, you´re deluded, everything he said is true, always has been, there is clearly a campaign against Chelsea and Mourinho, specially with referees, be it not awarding penalties, making wrong calls, booking players for diving when it´s clearly a foul, punishing players unfairly on and off the pitch, and countless other things. The reality now is others go unpunished ( Wenger pushing Mourinho, criticizing the refs, etc ), but they don´t hesitate for one second to target and punish us. Mou actually has the guts to stand up to that joke of an FA and say it how it is, he will not be a muppet for those bastards in charge, that´s what i love about the man, he stands up for himself and the club and doesn´t take bullsh*t from anyone. The only way those muppets in the FA know how to respond is with silly bans and fines, 50.000 pounds??? are you farking kidding me? i know it´s peanuts for Mou, but that´s irrational and unnecessary, i´m sorry but that is out of spite, bunch of cowardly twats, with no consistency whatsoever, they can all burn in hell for all i care. I would take the lot of them to court, because this is getting out of hand, why just Chelsea and not the other club`s managers or players? Show some farking consistency for once in your miserable lives, you karnts. I´m out.

[Pizy 18,861]

Hopefully next time one of these muppet refs does something José calls him weak and naive post match.

Apparently you're permitted to criticize the referees ability or performance. Call one incompetent and let's see if José gets fined. My guess is yes.

[Jase 43,479]

Mourinho was wrong to criticze the referee's decisions in the Southampton match but you can't say he's wrong here about the FA's inconsistency.

http://www.theguardian.com/football/2015/oct/15/jose-mourinho-chelsea-fa-fine-disgrace-electronic-tag

“Every word I say is a risk,” said Mourinho. “I am just happy I don’t have an electronic tag, but I think it’s not far from that. I also think that (to be fined) £50,000, in the world where we live today, is an absolute disgrace. An absolute disgrace. And I also think that the possibility of getting a stadium ban is also something absolutely astonishing.

“But more difficult for me to understand is when I compare different people with different behaviours or with similar behaviours, with different words or with similar words. I know I’m not English. I know my English is just good enough to work in this country, but is not perfect. But the difference between saying ‘afraid’ and ‘weak and naive’? The difference is £50,000 and [a potential] one-match stadium ban. So, for me, the conclusion is there is something that, now, we know.

“One, we can push people in the technical area. We can, no problem. So anyone in the technical area, we can push. Two, the word ‘afraid’ is a punishment, and a hard punishment. But to say the referee was ‘weak and naive’, referring to one of the top referees in this country and in Europe, we can do. So I think the only good thing of this last decision by the FA is that every manager in this country can write in a little book and, when he goes to a press conference, he knows that ‘afraid’ costs £50,000. ‘Weak and naïve’, you can use.

“For football in this country, what is more important is a word rather than aggression. So now we know. They are the only two good things I take from that. It’s good for everyone. It’s that’s the only reason I can still walk in London without an electronic tag.”

The most baffling thing about the punishment is the stadium ban. Had the FA handed him a touchline ban, then I can understand. But a stadium ban because of some comments made about the referee?!

[lionsden 4,689]

Ofcourse this is the type of response I expected. biased to the core. Apparently the English FA, Spanish and Italian media and FA all have an agenda against him and his teams. It's just so happens that the controversy that seems to follow him around every club he goes are not his fault and the whole world are out to get poor old jose.

It's time he takes a hard look at himself in the mirror and start taking responsibilities for his actions (if he's ever capable of that). All things considered, he's actually gotten away with quite a few professional misconduct since he arrived, many jabs at referees and opposition managers and players that haven't been punished. Majority of his senseless rants about "conspiracy against chelsea" were ignored as well. And the gullible people that have fallen for the "He's doing it and saying it to take pressure off his players" "classic jose mind games" (as if that's a justification for being controversial and unprofessional) do not help matters either.

[zolayes 14,489]

Mourinho was wrong to criticze the referee's decisions in the Southampton match but you can't say he's wrong here about the FA's inconsistency.

http://www.theguardian.com/football/2015/oct/15/jose-mourinho-chelsea-fa-fine-disgrace-electronic-tag

The most baffling thing about the punishment is the stadium ban. Had the FA handed him a touchline ban, then I can understand. But a stadium ban because of some comments made about the referee?!

Why just for once can he not stop the bull shit ..THERE is no agenda except the one in his mind .. No I don't even think he believes it .. IT IS BEYOND TEDIOUS

[Johnnyeye 7,501]

Mourinho was wrong to criticze the referee's decisions in the Southampton match but you can't say he's wrong here about the FA's inconsistency.

http://www.theguardian.com/football/2015/oct/15/jose-mourinho-chelsea-fa-fine-disgrace-electronic-tag

The most baffling thing about the punishment is the stadium ban. Had the FA handed him a touchline ban, then I can understand. But a stadium ban because of some comments made about the referee?!

Clear campaign against us, i wouldn´t be surprised that the fact that Mourinho is portuguese and succesful, and the FA being english and all, are just butthurt from England´s failures against Portugal, 2004 and 2006 and are acting out of spite and Chelsea are paying the price for it too. Not trying to create conspiracies here, it´s just that nothing surprises me these days and if that were to be true, it would be a new low, but it´s probably just the fact that it´s Chelsea.

[Styles 9,790]

Just on the train home right now and finished reading group the story in the Evening Standard. The one about a certain player having a derogatory name for Mourinho. I laughed out loud reading it haha.

[Jase 43,479]

Ofcourse this is the type of response I expected. biased to the core. Apparently the English FA, Spanish and Italian media and FA all have an agenda against him and his teams. It's just so happens that the controversy that seems to follow him around every club he goes are not his fault and the whole world are out to get poor old jose.

Of course, this is the type of response I expected from you - negative to the core. Mourinho spoke mainly about the FA's inconsistency (which is clear for everyone to see) and other members pointed that out to you but here you are, ignoring them, perceiving them to be biased when they are not and filling the thread with your 23346435843753th criticism of Mourinho that's not even part of the subject at hand. Seriously, if you are not going to engage others in a proper debate and just going to dismiss their views because you are apparently right about everything Mourinho, then why bother joining a forum?

[Spike 12,049]

Of course, this is the type of respone I expected from you - negative to the core. Mourinho spoke mainly about the FA's inconsistency (which is clear for everyone to see) and other members pointed that out to you but here you are, ignoring them, perceiving them to be biased when they are not and filling the thread with your 23346435843753th criticism of Mourinho that's not even part of this subject at hand. Seriously, if you are not going to engage others in a proper debate and just going to dismiss their views because you are apparently right about everything Mourinho, then why bother joining a forum?

Haha! JASON BRING THE TOP QUALITY BANTZ

BLOWN

THE

FUCK

OUT

Clear campaign against us, i wouldn´t be surprised that the fact that Mourinho is portuguese and succesful, and the FA being english and all, are just butthurt from England´s failures against Portugal, 2004 and 2006 and are acting out of spite and Chelsea are paying the price for it too. Not trying to create conspiracies here, it´s just that nothing surprises me these days and if that were to be true, it would be a new low, but it´s probably just the fact that it´s Chelsea.

I don't believe there is a campaign against Chelsea. Every club get decisions there way and against them. The FA maybe be inconsistent but I don't believe they are biased towards any club. I feel it is as people read the most about Chelsea so they get a lopsided view of things; they only read one side of the die, when there is another 19 sides.