xPetrCechx 13,571 Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 So he is charged for what?The accident with emre can? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liquidator 5,176 Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 And the FA has the nerve to call FIFA incompetent and corrupt... Spike and dUMB 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
We Hate Scouse 10,326 Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 If he appealed and the ban was 4 would that mean he would miss the league cup final?If he appealed it and got 4 games before the Citeh game he wouldn't. If he appealed and a decision was made after the Citeh game and he played that he would. Sir Mikel OBE 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrBlueGuy 1,552 Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 If he appealed and the ban was 4 would that mean he would miss the league cup final?West Ham will be the last game if it is 4. Sir Mikel OBE 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MichaelDance 552 Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 Fuck the FA targeting Chelsea again... FA = Fucking Arsehole's suppose their initials are correct. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! supporter 3,088 Posted January 28, 2015 Popular Post! Share Posted January 28, 2015 Daily Mail. "Chelsea striker Diego Costa has been Charged with violent conduct by the FA following clash with Emre Can". #FAfoulplayCampaign #CHELSEAnevergiveup I apologize to all forum members to repeat my message in this thread. I've also put in the thread of Chelsea v Manchester City, but I think it is important that all forum members can read this. Sorry if I annoying someone. FA is a shame.Regards to all. LAB, Elran, bababoom and 4 others 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
We Hate Scouse 10,326 Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 West Ham will be the last game if it is 4.CitehVillaEvertonBurnleyLeague Cup FinalWest HamNo it won't Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OhForAGreavsie 6,075 Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 Let's be honest... If Liverpool player did that to us, we would say he must be banned. No complains here.Indeed, Costa is guilty of something but there is a mountain of precedent to suggest that an equally guilty Liverpool player would probably not be charged. Luis Suarez has done much, much worse and I don't mean the biting. We've all seen the videos where he goes over the ball to put in a disgusting, career threatening challenge then rolls around pretending that it's him who has been fouled. There can be no doubt that Suarez has committed these fouls intentionally and with premeditation but does he get done retrospectively for them? MichaelDance and dUMB 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! Term-X 7,891 Posted January 28, 2015 Popular Post! Share Posted January 28, 2015 This was a blessing for the FA, they want a wide open title race.. perfect timing. Chelsea Legend 11, supporter, LDN Blue and 2 others 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milan 17,957 Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 https://vine.co/v/OT0b6tzODXYAs Ash tweeted once upon a time - FA = bunch of twats. We have a crucial game on Saturday and look how quicky FA acted, especially with the appeal possibility.Us against the rest of the world feels really good, though, I have to admit. LAB 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MichaelDance 552 Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 Indeed, Costa is guilty of something but there is a mountain of precedent to suggest that an equally guilty Liverpool player would probably not be charged. Luis Suarez has done much, much worse and I don't mean the biting. We've all seen the videos where he goes over the ball to put in a disgusting, career threatening challenge then rolls around pretending that it's him who has been fouled. There can be no doubt that Suarez has committed these fouls intentionally and with premeditation but does he get done retrospectively for them?He never played for us though... If he did he would have got fined and charged. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Mikel OBE 4,920 Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 I think we should just accept if its 3. Nice rest for him and we should be able to get whats needed with what we have in that run. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vybz Kartel 1,613 Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 An appeal is hopeless, I have never had of an appeal which has been successful especially when it comes to the us Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OhForAGreavsie 6,075 Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 As long as Jose selects Remy, not The Drog, we can ride out any suspension. killer1257 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OhForAGreavsie 6,075 Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 He never played for us though... If he did he would have got fined and charged.Yes, for each one and there have been a lot of them. By the time the FA came to deal with the last one, the national outcry for a lifetime ban would have been deafening. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hamilton 2,120 Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 We could all see this coming, diego's behavour lately went a bridge to far... This is not an act from the fa against Chelsea.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eidur the Spider 4,515 Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 I think the key here for me, and many others I'd assume, is consistency from the FA. We see countless examples on twitter etc...of cases against Liverpool, Man City or United players that go unpunished. That's the frustration for me. consistency is key, and the FA bring trouble and criticism on themselves because of that. MichaelDance, dUMB and Barbara 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MichaelDance 552 Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 We could all see this coming, diego's behavour lately went a bridge to far... This is not an act from the fa against Chelsea..To be honest Man Utd have rugby tackled us and held us in their goal, and much more but they go on un noticed, but when it's us that's it straight fine and ban. If anything he should have got a fine for that stamp. Nothing else. Like Jose he just says something about a ref, what happens... he gets a fine. Why? Because he's our manager... You can't stand up for the FA like that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHOULO19 24,332 Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 Inevitable. Once the media started talking about it was bound to happen.I think it's incredibly unlikely that it was accidental, but at the same time I don't think he stamped with any real force. He intentionally stepped on Cann and Skrtel. Yes, the FA are working with complete double standards, but it was so unnecessary from Costa. He doesn't need to give the FA something to try to ban him for. DYC., LDN Blue, Hamilton and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Special Juan 28,141 Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 As expected, suits their agenda perfectly. Lets chuck stones at Chelsea. iseah100 and MichaelDance 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.