Cesc Fàbregas

[Chelsea Legend 11 4,062]

exactly far too many ppl already incorporatin Fabregas in their lineups.

Arsenal just have to be informed once a formal bid is received, then they have to decide whether they choose to activate it or not. could be a massive troll from Arsenal waiting till the last minute. not taking anything for granted yet.

If the most recent board meeting is accurate then I doubt they are going to do anything. Apparently they are looking to strengthen in other areas on the pitch...

[Special Juan 28,132]

Nah I cannot see Arsenal coming with anything considering very reliable journalists from the BBC have said they won't act upon it. He needs a new challenge this lad, a fresh one, and we can offer that. Arsenal also have far more pressing areas than midfield they need to spend money on.

[CHOULO19 24,332]

Arsenal will be screwing themselves over if they hijack this deal because if they spend 26m on Cesc, they'll have little or no money for the transfers they really need like fullbacks and a striker. Their funds are more limited than ours. I just can't see Wenger wasting all that money just to spite us.

Deal will probably be announced some time next week alongside the Costa transfer IMO... Until then just sit back and relax.

I'm imagining/fantasizing the Costa and Fabregas deals being announced together with a big picture of them on the official site next to each other in the Spain camp holding Chelsea shirts and smiling.

[The Mak 4,459]

Charlie Perdios @AnthonyPepeEA Arsenal will not receive 50% of Fabregas sell on fee , only 50% of anything above 33m pounds . If he goes to Chelsea for 33m AFC get nothing

Let's do a Wenger and bid £1 over 33m so they can get 50p for us acquiring their 'legend'.

[cadenza666 221]

Arsenal will be screwing themselves over if they hijack this deal because if they spend 26m on Cesc, they'll have little or no money for the transfers they really need like fullbacks and a striker. Their funds are more limited than ours. I just can't see Wenger wasting all that money just to spite us.

I'm imagining/fantasizing the Costa and Fabregas deals being announced together with a big picture of them on the official site next to each other in the Spain camp holding Chelsea shirts and smiling.

little or no money ? Arse have 50m in revenue from Emirates sponsorship per year alone ! ....the cunts will be having easily 100m+ to spend !

[Pizy 18,877]

Nah I cannot see Arsenal coming with anything considering very reliable journalists from the BBC have said they won't act upon it. He needs a new challenge this lad, a fresh one, and we can offer that. Arsenal also have far more pressing areas than midfield they need to spend money on.

Conspiracy theory/me being my normal paranoid self: Arsenal are telling the media that they have no need for Cesc anymore in order to make all of their supporters mad only to sign him at the last minute so that Wenger looks like a hero for "stealing" him from Chelsea Willian style.

[Waterfall 893]

FA9 @Football_Agent9 · 1m

Chelsea will let Ramires leave if they bring in Fabregas, players decision to be made over the weekend.

========================

Now, before everyone goes, "another Palmeri, twitter BS", this guy's a legit football agent who's followed by journos from BBC, Guardian, Times and Sky. Not always right of course, but he's most likely not making things up.

[Barbara 15,149]

You guys caught the pattern? It's all written in the stars... with initials.

Diego Costa

Cesc Fabregas

Filipe Luis.

Luke Shaw.

I'd be done if it happens, although I think it's unlikely for us to sign Shaw and I think us signing two key players from Atletico might also not happen. It's the same with all speculations of PSG buying so many players from us. But it may be written somewhere

[Thendo 1,088]

I won't trust anyone calling themself "Football_Agent9" on twitter...

[CHOULO19 24,332]

little or no money ? Arse have 50m in revenue from Emirates sponsorship per year alone ! ....the cunts will be having easily 100m+ to spend !

What they're making is one thing and what the owners allow Wenger to spend is completely another. Their owners run the club as a business, they want their yearly profit before anything.

[Nero 1,870]

SkySports Nigeria <3

[Barbara 15,149]

What they're making is one thing and what the owners allow Wenger to spend is completely another. Their owners run the club as a business, they want their yearly profit before anything.

what's their yearly profit anyway?

Arsene just doesn't spend money at all...

[Waterfall 893]

I won't trust anyone calling themself "Football_Agent9" on twitter...

It does sound very sketchy, but like I said, guys from the most reputable outlets in Britain (BBC, Sky, Guardian, Times) are following him. In fact I think I only started following him because one of the Sky Sports guys did the #FF

[Chelsea Legend 11 4,062]

FA9 @Football_Agent9 · 1m

Chelsea will let Ramires leave if they bring in Fabregas, players decision to be made over the weekend.

========================

Now, before everyone goes, "another Palmeri, twitter BS", this guy's a legit football agent who's followed by journos from BBC, Guardian, Times and Sky. Not always right of course, but he's most likely not making things up.

LOL Dude... No "football agent" is sitting on his twitter account 24/7 leaking the latest transfer gossip. Its likely he's another journo who is has the same 'sources' as Tancredi...

He said this too

FA9 @Football_Agent9 · Jun 4

Diego Costa to Chelsea is going to be confirmed tomorrow or Friday apparently, all the literature has been written for the website today.

Its Saturday on this side of the world btw...

[CHOULO19 24,332]

what's their yearly profit anyway?

Arsene just doesn't spend money at all...

Their income is very high, but I think they're still paying for their stadium. I vaguely remember Wenger once talking about it an interview. Anyway, Wenger really hasn't had a lot to spend in the past years and to be fair he's done a very good job consider the circumstances.