Marco van Ginkel

[BleedsBlue 1,549]

Thats the end of his Chelsea career, we all know how the process goes once you go out on loan u never truly come back

nah I am sure he will be our replacement for Mikel.

[BleedsBlue 1,549]

I don't have much idea about the non HG quota system but maybe Cech's decision to stay at the club has forced Jose to send Marco out on loan?

[romeeh 139]

not only MVG leaving on loan...same thing looks going happen with salah and there is secret offers from aston villa and sunderland to take him for 1 year on loan

[Jype 6,398]

As long as Milan also take Torres off our hands I'm willing to accept a loan for MvG, otherwise they can fuck right off.

[CHOULO19 24,332]

not only MVG leaving on loan...same thing looks going happen with salah and there is secret offers from aston villa and sunderland to take him for 1 year on loan

How do you know about them, then?

[romeeh 139]

How do you know about them, then?

because iam deep looking about salah news

[didierforever 7,349]

because iam deep looking about salah news

and why would we loan salah after loaning out moses?

we have only 4 AMs in case salah is loaned.

[Styles 9,790]

His injury last year was so unfortunate, he would have got enough games/been able to develop and would perhaps have more of a role here. That injury was such a setback for the kid, real shame.

[Alee. 182]

From Transfer Central

Milan CEO: “Van Ginkel? We are confident. We have made our proposal to Chelsea and are now waiting on an answer. We hope we can get him.”

[romeeh 139]

and why would we loan salah after loaning out moses?

we have only 4 AMs in case salah is loaned.

well ramires can play as winger beside willian,hazard,schurrle with oscar and fabregas ,u got matic and mikel as CB too ...guess cheslea dont have problem with loaning salah and u can c that he wasnt even in the squad list last 2 matches which means there is enough subs for am on bench without salah

[didierforever 7,349]

well ramires can play as winger beside willian,hazard,schurrle with oscar and fabregas ,u got matic and mikel as CB too ...guess cheslea dont have problem with loaning salah and u can c that he wasnt even in the squad list last 2 matches which means there is enough subs for am on bench without salah

there are going to be 60 matches in the season. u need atleast 2 players for a position. we play a 5 man mid and will have willian, oscar, hazard, schurrle, cesc, mikel, rambo, matic as our only options.

do u remember last season when we had CL obligations. salah started every PL match. that is what fixture congestion can do.

and its been 2 matches man... only 2 matches. azpi dint play for the first 6/7.. and he was then one of our players of the season.

[Barbara 15,149]

In theory, if Torres leaves, Marco can stay. There are two problems though: 1) Milan might make Marco's loan a condition 2) Marco himself may want to leave so he'll continue his development.

I'm very pro Marco continuing his development, I just think that if we offloaded Torres, we could afford to keep both Mikel and Marco in the team, and instead of giving Mikel minutes, Mourinho would be giving Marco - some in the big competitions, and definitely full matches in the domestic cups, that until Mikel actually gets his passport and then leaves for good. But that's me... Mourinho seems to think Mikel is more useful than Marco.

[Jype 6,398]

well ramires can play as winger beside willian,hazard,schurrle with oscar and fabregas ,u got matic and mikel as CB too ...guess cheslea dont have problem with loaning salah and u can c that he wasnt even in the squad list last 2 matches which means there is enough subs for am on bench without salah

In case MvG is going we’ll have Hazard, Oscar, Willian, Schürrle, Salah, Fabregas, Matic, Ramires and Mikel in midfield. That’s nine players, at least five of whom will be required on the pitch at any given time and in every game there will be at least one or two substitutions for the midfield department. Loaning out Salah would leave us with just 8 players for five positions which is nowhere near enough depth for a team that plays around 50-60 games a season and we’d be a couple of injuries or suspensions away from having no midfield substitutes on the bench at all.

I get it that you as an Egyptian want to see your lad play and wouldn't mind a move but from Chelsea's point of view that would pretty much ruin the whole transfer window which has been brilliant so far.

[romeeh 139]

In theory, if Torres leaves, Marco can stay. There are two problems though: 1) Milan might make Marco's loan a condition 2) Marco himself may want to leave so he'll continue his development.

I'm very pro Marco continuing his development, I just think that if we offloaded Torres, we could afford to keep both Mikel and Marco in the team, and instead of giving Mikel minutes, Mourinho would be giving Marco - some in the big competitions, and definitely full matches in the domestic cups, that until Mikel actually gets his passport and then leaves for good. But that's me... Mourinho seems to think Mikel is more useful than Marco.

Jose said it clear he wont get rid of torres if he couldnt get another 3rd striker.. u cant use 2 strikers only one of them actually should retire to save his legacy

[xPetrCechx 13,563]

http://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/aug/26/milan-marco-van-ginkel-chelsea

Milan confident of signing Marco van Ginkel on loan from Chelsea

[iseah100 5,612]

LOAN LOAN LOAN ONLY! Don't want him to leave, but if he must it better just be on loan.

[Chelsea? 892]

CChelsealoan a player out forget we ever had him so we sign a replacement for that position. That's why we signed salah even though we had Moses

[nadavTKL 1,787]

We reached an agreement with Milan on a loan only (without an option to buy). Now MVG has to decide if he wants it or he wants to stay.

http://gianlucadimarzio.com/en/calciomercato/milan-and-chelsea-reach-agreement-for-van-ginkel-now-its-up-to-the-player-to-decide/