👕 Chelsea Kits Thread

[Spike 12,049]

Looks like it has a built in training bra like the 09/10 kit. I hate it.

[KevinAshburner 1,270]

hey guys remember those days back in the adam and eve days. when we used to watch footballers play naked and there was no clothes and kits. i miss those days. i specially used to enjoy watching female women playing football and sports back in the adam and eve days playing naked netball and volleyball and female ground wrestling. 

[Parky 739]

10 minutes ago, KevinAshburner said:

hey guys remember those days back in the adam and eve days. when we used to watch footballers play naked and there was no clothes and kits. i miss those days. i specially used to enjoy watching female women playing football and sports back in the adam and eve days playing naked netball and volleyball and female ground wrestling. 

  I'll have what you're having thanks..lol

[kmk108 1,186]

20 minutes ago, Spike said:

Looks like it has a built in training bra like the 09/10 kit. I hate it.

It's the mesh of the new Nike template. It's not horribly noticeable on the pitch and the replicas don't have them

It's still better than those horrible lions all over this years shirt.

[quickpassnmove 924]

Nike and Conte.  some good things DID happen at CFC this year.

Good luck in a summer window that probably requires too many buys for Chelsea to turn it around suddenly.

[BlueLion. 21,491]

11 hours ago, Spike said:

Looks like it has a built in training bra like the 09/10 kit. I hate it.

But you said you don't care what the kits look like so you're not allowed an opinion Jakey xxx

[Rhino's Skin 972]

On 18/05/2016 at 2:56 AM, BlueLyon said:

This. UA is the new Nike. Only people with lack of vision dont see that.

Great...if they offer 70m plus then I am sure we would sign for them.

This is ONLY about money and nothing else no matter how they dress it up with fanciful wording such as 'brand awareness' etc etc

[BlueLion. 21,491]

23 minutes ago, Rhino's Skin said:

Great...if they offer 70m plus then I am sure we would sign for them.

This is ONLY about money and nothing else no matter how they dress it up with fanciful wording such as 'brand awareness' etc etc

Brand awareness is massively important, it is ignorant to dismiss that. If Macron offered £65 million, would you go with them?

 

 

No, I wouldn't either. 

[Parky 739]

Nike to score big with £600m Chelsea kit deal

'The US sportswear group outpaced competition from Under Armour, its fast growing but much smaller rival, after intense negotiations with Chelsea, according to a person directly involved in the talks.'
'The £600m deal, which is set to run for at least a decade, underscores the value Premier League clubs present to global brands, especially those with a growing commercial interest in Asia, even if jersey sales do not necessarily offset the size of the big deals. It also marks a change in the way that brands are using their endorsement money in mega deals, favouring teams over individuals, said Matt Powell, sports industry analyst at NPD, the research group.'

http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/86f7555e-1ce7-11e6-a7bc-ee846770ec15.html#axzz495nhb5ds

 

[Sovieticus 743]

15 hours ago, MefiX19 said:

Lol im like a proper eastern european men have an adidas trousers, tracksuit and boots from sports direct

They either have sneakers or formal shoes aka "lakierkos". That sums it up pretty much

[Clevemayer 764]

17 hours ago, manpe said:

Nah man, that pic of me is ace! Squatting like a pro...

 

 

how come i've never heard of him? now the internet still has so much to offer mer... and I thought I've surfed the internet till the end.... thank you man.

[Spike 12,049]

6 hours ago, BlueLion. said:

But you said you don't care what the kits look like so you're not allowed an opinion Jakey xxx

Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't hate. Sort of how I feel about you. Besides, I'm an equal opportunist, I'll give Nike all the hate I gave Adidas.

[kmk108 1,186]

5 hours ago, BlueLion. said:

Brand awareness is massively important, it is ignorant to dismiss that. If Macron offered £65 million, would you go with them?

 

 

No, I wouldn't either. 

Make that plain blue with a white collar and white piping on the sleeves and hell yes I would.

[KevinAshburner 1,270]

Seriously a Basketballer worth a Billion Dollars and NIKE wants to be taken seriously no matter how good Lebron James is. One Man/Basketballer worth a Billion Dollars.

Meet Maverick Carter, the Man Behind LeBron’s Billion-Dollar Nike Deal

BY : MARK ANTHONY GREEN - May 17, 2016

He’s LeBron’s business partner. One of the famous Four Horsemen who grew up with King James in Ohio. And one of the only people on earth who knows if that lifetime Nike deal was really worth a billion dollars. Here, Maverick Carter shares his battle-tested tactics—and the big secret.

http://www.gq.com/story/lebron-james-nike-deal-bilion-maverick-carter

[Rhino's Skin 972]

21 hours ago, BlueLion. said:

Brand awareness is massively important, it is ignorant to dismiss that. If Macron offered £65 million, would you go with them?

 

 

No, I wouldn't either. 

Why not.....the kit wont vary that much.  It will still be blue and considering the variations we have had in the past we cannot do much worse.

 

Chelsea are a huge brand already so brand awareness and all that mumbo jumbo sales pitch is a load of guff and irrelevant.

Money talks.....not what a shirt looks like

[Term-X 7,891]

1 hour ago, Rhino's Skin said:

Chelsea are a huge brand already so brand awareness and all that mumbo jumbo sales pitch is a load of guff and irrelevant.

Money talks.....not what a shirt looks like

The Chelsea brand is only stronger in collaboration with the other big brands. Switching from Adidas or Nike only represents decline in European football. Even if Nike had offered less than UA, we would have made more revenue in the long run with Nike, due to their reach and status.

You're out of your depth discussing a top like this tbh, clearly you no nothing of marketing/brand awareness. 

[Term-X 7,891]

Under Armour have made the ugliest kits in the history of football, Macron actually aren't that bad.. but they scream 'small time'.

[Rhino's Skin 972]

58 minutes ago, Term-X said:

The Chelsea brand is only stronger in collaboration with the other big brands. Switching from Adidas or Nike only represents decline in European football. Even if Nike had offered less than UA, we would have made more revenue in the long run with Nike, due to their reach and status.

You're out of your depth discussing a top like this tbh, clearly you no nothing of marketing/brand awareness. 

If Chelsea switched to any known brand the shirts would sell no matter what....and the club shop would still sell the branded clothing.

Chelsea dont make money on every shirt sold.....only the ones the club shops sell.  

Under Armour, Puma etc etc would all work.

As you do not know me please dont speculate on what I know about marketing and all the buzz word bollix associated with it.

Was in the game for years