Daniel Sturridge

[bushman 2,043]

Somehow, most of you keep forgetting Sturridge did not want to play for Chelsea. His shitty attitude, selfishness was not good for the team. Chelsea were correct to sell him. 12m is in the bank, so fuck Sturridge, let him play in Liverpoops.

[didierforever 7,349]

We made the mistake signing Torres. We committed close to £100 million on him and that had other ramifications. We're seeing other results of it now.

Continually moaning about selling Sturridge as an 'I told you so' really is fucking pathetic. Move on. Look to the future, and if you can't do that then support the red bunch. They never make bad decisions when it comes to transfers.

to look at the fucking future and have a decent future, u need to know and understand the bloody blunders and asenine mistakes of your fucking past.

did we learn for a year and a half from the torres fiasco, NO... we gave him a complete season as our NO.1 and ONLY striker. how much do u think the board and even the fans have learnt from selling sturridge and keeping the fucking blonde twat... the answer is NADA.

plus y should i stop saying told u so when people here had the guts and audacity to condemn sturridge on his one performance in 6 months with no match fitness, no starts prior to that one start against wba. and what the hell they still fucking think of only that 2-3 chances which sturridge failed to convert more than anythin else he has done ever. so my saying i told u so is a very appropriate response to people who ridiculed any1 who had the guts to write danny's name ahead of the ladyboy's in the match thread.

also dont tell me what to support and what not to support. know your bloody limits... this is not the 1st time u have done this... remember the bloody leeds match-fiasco?...

[Milan 17,955]

His tackle against Bertrand was pretty dirty.

[Leif 6,006]

Can this thread just be deleted and burned to ashes?

[xPetrCechx 13,570]

His tackle against Bertrand was pretty dirty.

AT LEAST HE APOLOGIZED...

[Las7 951]

Somehow, most of you keep forgetting Sturridge did not want to play for Chelsea. His shitty attitude, selfishness was not good for the team. Chelsea were correct to sell him. 12m is in the bank, so fuck Sturridge, let him play in Liverpoops.

He did not want to play because for an year and a half that blonde piece of crap was selected up top despite being outscored by Sturridge the whole time.

[xPetrCechx 13,570]

Can this thread just be deleted and burned to ashes?

RIGHT! BIG CHELSEA'S MISTAKE!

[The only place to be 11,313]

to look at the fucking future and have a decent future, u need to know and understand the bloody blunders and asenine mistakes of your fucking past.

did we learn for a year and a half from the torres fiasco, NO... we gave him a complete season as our NO.1 and ONLY striker. how much do u think the board and even the fans have learnt from selling sturridge and keeping the fucking blonde twat... the answer is NADA.

plus y should i stop saying told u so when people here had the guts and audacity to condemn sturridge on his one performance in 6 months with no match fitness, no starts prior to that one start against wba. and what the hell they still fucking think of only that 2-3 chances which sturridge failed to convert more than anythin else he has done ever. so my saying i told u so is a very appropriate response to people who ridiculed any1 who had the guts to write danny's name ahead of the ladyboy's in the match thread.

also dont tell me what to support and what not to support. know your bloody limits... this is not the 1st time u have done this... remember the bloody leeds match-fiasco?...

Was that the Leeds match where you wanted them to beat us?

We have looked at the mistakes of our past but we have to live with the ramifications of them for a while. We had to give Torres a chance because of the financial commitment we made to him. It's easy for people like you to say we should sell him or bench him but you don't have to think about the finances of the club.

You make it sound like it was a straight choice between Sturridge and Torres, but there were other factors in play. He's gone now and he had a good game against us. He's also had bad ones and was benched for this one.

As for my limits, I think I'll comment on what I want, when I want. If you don't like it, meh.

[The only place to be 11,313]

He did not want to play because for an year and a half that blonde piece of crap was selected up top despite being outscored by Sturridge the whole time.

Torres cost £50 million PLUS wages. You have to remember this because it does matter.

[Amblève. 4,995]

Somehow, most of you keep forgetting Sturridge did not want to play for Chelsea. His shitty attitude, selfishness was not good for the team. Chelsea were correct to sell him. 12m is in the bank, so fuck Sturridge, let him play in Liverpoops.

HE DID NOT WANNA PLAY FOR US?! Are you actually taking the piss? If anything, Sturridge wanted to play EVERY game. But yeah, let's twist things the way you want. Smh.

"Shitty attitude, selfishness" - :banghead:

[Las7 951]

Torres cost £50 million PLUS wages. You have to remember this because it does matter.

Kaka is costing as much but is kept on the bench for Real, it's why our treatment of Torres is a farce

[bushman 2,043]

He did not want to play because for an year and a half that blonde piece of crap was selected up top despite being outscored by Sturridge the whole time.

If I remember well, he wasn´t much in those few games he played. Mind you I do agree he could have gotten more chances.

His attitude was not what Chelsea needed. Let him play for Liverpoops, he is not missed by Chelsea.

[The only place to be 11,313]

Kaka is costing as much but is kept on the bench for Real, it's why our treatment of Torres is a farce

Apples and oranges. Financial realities matter unfortunately.

[ja1 1,166]

Somehow, most of you keep forgetting Sturridge did not want to play for Chelsea. His shitty attitude, selfishness was not good for the team. Chelsea were correct to sell him. 12m is in the bank, so fuck Sturridge, let him play in Liverpoops.

Yep I saw evidence of this 'shitty attitude' then, like the etiquette he shows to not celebrate the goal, or when he wanted to stop play and helped Bertrand back up after fouling him.

I also saw evidence of him never passing the ball. You know, getting an assist and setting up 2 clear-cut chances.

[Las7 951]

Apples and oranges. Financial realities matter unfortunately.

O Rly? You know what loosing out on the top 4 because of that blonde piece of crap will cost us nearly as much as we have spend on him.

HE HAS NOT SCORED A GOAL IN THE LEAGUE SINCE DECEMBER.

Meantime Sturridge scored goals against Us; City; Manchester United - for half an year Sturridge has more important goals for Liverpool in the League than Torres has for over 2 years at CFC!