🇧🇪 Eden Hazard

[Jase 43,479]

With comments like these, it's little wonder that Hazard has never really improved and is just stuck at a good level with little consistency...

https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/8247956/chelsea-hazard-sarri-mourinho-frustrated/

"I’ve frustrated all my managers and now I’m still frustrating Sarri. I frustrated Mourinho. They think I need to score more, do more of this or that. And the next coach, I’ll frustrate him too."

“We associate football too much with the word win.

“With young players it’s the same, they have to win, win, win. Little by little players forget to enjoy it. I’ve always put pleasure before winning.

“What bothers me is that players are put into the top three or four because of the trophies they’ve won and their statistics.

“That’s not what I’m after, I just want to enjoy myself on the pitch. So top five, ten, 20, that’s not my problem.

“If a bloke thinks only of stats I won’t be in his list of top players. But if he thinks about enjoying the game, I’ll be in the top three. What I have already achieved is very good. When I look at my career, I think ‘That’s great’.

“The only thing I’m missing are the stats.

“If I end up with 30 goals and 20 assists this season, people will say ‘Yeah, that’s exceptional’ even if I play some rubbish games. But that’s not what I want.”

[Magic Lamps 11,692]

12 minutes ago, Jason said:

With comments like these, it's little wonder that Hazard has never really improved and is just stuck at a good level with little consistency...

https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/8247956/chelsea-hazard-sarri-mourinho-frustrated/

 

 

Well I have to strongly disagree with him. I would take a player like Salah who is not remotedly as technically smooth as Hazard over him. Salah might have the occasional shit game and also has some gross technical errors in his game from time to time like a bad control or a lose first touch but scores almost every game and as a consequence Liveprool are title favourites whilst we are in for a struggle for 4th. That is more or less how the main differnece between a title winning squad and an ok CL place candidate - how prolific your top scorer or star player is. Add the 7 goals Salah has over Hazard and we have maybe 10 points more. Apart from those goals there is not much of a difference between our and Liverpools squad IMO. They have a better manager and slightly better players in defence and a better striker but that's it.

But that is not really the problem I have with those comments. Often when a person commemorates the status quo it is to hide the fact that they are afraid to challenge themselves and push themselves to improve upon the current position because they are afraid to fail and have no excuse like "I never wanted it anyway" left.

[Unionjack 7,531]

35 minutes ago, Special Juan said:

I didn't think anyone could talk more than wife.

Between him and his old man and old T;Boa and his they could yak up a storm.

Imagine oin some family get together and they dropped some some speed or a load of Columbian marching powder!!

 

 

[Clockwork 1,794]

3 hours ago, Magic Lamps said:

Well I have to strongly disagree with him. I would take a player like Salah who is not remotedly as technically smooth as Hazard over him. Salah might have the occasional shit game and also has some gross technical errors in his game from time to time like a bad control or a lose first touch but scores almost every game and as a consequence Liveprool are title favourites whilst we are in for a struggle for 4th. That is more or less how the main differnece between a title winning squad and an ok CL place candidate - how prolific your top scorer or star player is. Add the 7 goals Salah has over Hazard and we have maybe 10 points more. Apart from those goals there is not much of a difference between our and Liverpools squad IMO. They have a better manager and slightly better players in defence and a better striker but that's it.

But that is not really the problem I have with those comments. Often when a person commemorates the status quo it is to hide the fact that they are afraid to challenge themselves and push themselves to improve upon the current position because they are afraid to fail and have no excuse like "I never wanted it anyway" left.

Robertson and TAA are world apart from our FB, especially in attack they are incredibly influential offensively. Mane, Firmino, and Shaquri are better than anyone we have in our attack beside Hazard. Liverpool biggest weakness is midfield, but that is minimized because they basically bypass it with quick passing to the FB and FW. 

You really can't think it is that simple, that Salah would be anywhere near as effective as he is on this team. 

[Magic Lamps 11,692]

30 minutes ago, Clockwork said:

Robertson and TAA are world apart from our FB, especially in attack they are incredibly influential offensively. Mane, Firmino, and Shaquri are better than anyone we have in our attack beside Hazard. Liverpool biggest weakness is midfield, but that is minimized because they basically bypass it with quick passing to the FB and FW. 

You really can't think it is that simple, that Salah would be anywhere near as effective as he is on this team. 

Robertson is defo better than Alonso but TAA is not better than Azpi not even offensively IMO, Azpi gets way too much stick he is usually pretty tidy in offense and a decent crosser. VVD is better than our CBS but David and Rüdiger are better than whoever their 2nd CB is rn. I would say Pedro is better than Shaqiri and maybe slightly worse than Mane but not much. Willian is shit but also not too much worse than Shaqiri who is more of an impact sub used in midfield anyway. Firmino is their main striker and clearly better than what we have but i acknowledged that already. So i remain with my point that we are only slightly worse than them overall, if you take the star players out.

[Unionjack 7,531]

Chelsea transfer news: Eden Hazard has agreed five-year deal with Real Madrid - Inda

 

CHELSEA star Eden Hazard will join Real Madrid this summer after agreeing a five-year deal.

https://www.dailystar.co.uk/sport/football/755014/Chelsea-transfer-news-Eden-Hazard-Real-Madrid-Eduardo-Inda-Cristiano-Ronaldo-La-Liga?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+daily-star-football+(Daily+Star+%3A%3A+Football+Feed)

[Special Juan 28,141]

If true, good. We can start planning now for life without him.

[Vesper 30,171]

19 minutes ago, Magic Lamps said:

Robertson is defo better than Alonso but TAA is not better than Azpi not even offensively IMO, Azpi gets way too much stick he is usually pretty tidy in offense and a decent crosser. VVD is better than our CBS but David and Rüdiger are better than whoever their 2nd CB is rn. I would say Pedro is better than Shaqiri and maybe slightly worse than Mane but not much. Willian is shit but also not too much worse than Shaqiri who is more of an impact sub used in midfield anyway. Firmino is their main striker and clearly better than what we have but i acknowledged that already. So i remain with my point that we are only slightly worse than them overall, if you take the star players out.

I rarely disagree with you but I must on this. I would take TAA all day over Azpi at this point, especially due to age and offensive play, and would take Gomez over Luiz, probably soon Rudiger too.

Those are two very very special young talents Victimpool have. 

VVD is in a battle atm for top CB on the planet with Koulibaly IMHO, so that lifts their starting back 4 overall (they have shit for depth there) to the best in the EPL unless Mendy comes back full-blown for Shitty, and probably even then.

Pedro is miles behind Mane at this stage as well.

[robsblubot 3,595]

6 hours ago, Magic Lamps said:

Well I have to strongly disagree with him. I would take a player like Salah who is not remotedly as technically smooth as Hazard over him. Salah might have the occasional shit game and also has some gross technical errors in his game from time to time like a bad control or a lose first touch but scores almost every game and as a consequence Liveprool are title favourites whilst we are in for a struggle for 4th. That is more or less how the main differnece between a title winning squad and an ok CL place candidate - how prolific your top scorer or star player is. Add the 7 goals Salah has over Hazard and we have maybe 10 points more. Apart from those goals there is not much of a difference between our and Liverpools squad IMO. They have a better manager and slightly better players in defence and a better striker but that's it.

But that is not really the problem I have with those comments. Often when a person commemorates the status quo it is to hide the fact that they are afraid to challenge themselves and push themselves to improve upon the current position because they are afraid to fail and have no excuse like "I never wanted it anyway" left.

Spot on.

just to add that the occasional bad touch or miskick from Salah may also be the price he pays for his quickness.

perhaps his game would be a lot cleaner if  he slowed down a bit. Good for Liverpool that he does not.

[Miguelito 459]

 

7 hours ago, Jason said:

With comments like these, it's little wonder that Hazard has never really improved and is just stuck at a good level with little consistency...

https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/8247956/chelsea-hazard-sarri-mourinho-frustrated/

 

 

I know that most people will hate these comments and use it against him, but I find it so refreshing. What he said is true.  We emphasize "winning" so much more than we should. Obviously there is a need for competitiveness and winning, but at what cost? If you hate what you do but are good at, what kind of a life is that? 

It's why Mou's philosophy doesn't work anymore. He pits this us against the world mentality, where you have to fight with you blood constantly, and that's mentally exhausting over time. Players (especially younger players) want to enjoy their football, not be exhausted by it. In Hazard's mind, winning is secondary to enjoying for what it is, the beautiful game. Winning and results are then a product of the enjoyment, not the sole reason for it.  

He's somebody who has got his priorities right in life. It's in his personality. Yes, there is no doubt that at times it holds him back from being more clinical or influential, but that should never supersede his love for the game.  He's playing the sport in the world as his job, entertaining fans in the process. He should be enjoying that.  We can't change him and we shouldn't try. It does mean that we should get other players in the team who are on the other end of the spectrum, or ones at least a little further.  We need all those perspectives.  

It's another reason I love Sarri and think that he gives us more of a chance of Hazard staying. Sarri came in and immediately said the most important thing is for these footballers to enjoy their work. When we tied Liverpool when we should have won, Sarri had a smile on his face at the end of the game. Again, I know people hate this, but I admire it.  The beauty of the game as a whole is more important than one particular team winning.  

I know I will likely get slaughtered for saying this, but I hope you all get what i mean. I'm not saying winning doesn't matter.  

[xPetrCechx 13,570]

No reliable sources...

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

[OneMoSalah 8,886]

21 hours ago, Belgiannutt said:

Very good teammates huh let's see shall we.

RW :In the 7 years that Hazard has been here only Mata has ever been close to Hazard's quality and he only played with Mata in his first year, second year Mata was 4th choice and left mid season. That's the closest Hazard has ever gotten to another superstar sharing the load.

The rest he's had to play with average players such as Moses, Willian, Oscar, Schurrle and Pedro.

ST :He's had to play with Torres for his first 2 years and his last 2 years with Morata. 

He played with Costa for 3 years. Not a coincidence that those 2 PL titles were won in the only three years he actually had a proper striker to play with. 

LB: Then there's also the left backs he's had to play with. A past his prime A Cole, a right footed Azpi and Alonso. 

And again for the underperforming seasons? His team mates faults obviously? Ironically the two years we win the title with everyone playing well in our team, he is considered hugely important but nobody talks about the lack of effort and bad performances on his behalf also crucial to two hugely disappointing campaigns, although hes not the only one but theres always an excuse, Mourinho, Conte, Sarri... or Willian or Pedro.... funny

 

And teammates. Lets not forget when Azpi played at LB he was on par with the best LBs in the league bar that bad 6 months under Jose. Juan Mata when he was here, was also a lot better than Hazard the first season and then Mourinho froze him out. Fabregas and Costa for the first 6 months under Mourinho were more key to CFC team than Eden because they did what our team lacked, being decisive in the final third, creating or scoring goals. Azpi, Luiz, Kante, Matic, all very good and important the year we won the title playing 343, creating that hugely solid platform that made us hard to beat, with Costa providing the killer instinct upfront too. Wingbacks as well deserve praise that season. The successes havent just been built on the back of Edens performances. Which is what I get the feeling people are hinting at a lot. Its Chelsea FC not Hazard FC. 

Sure we could habe had world class players in other positions but I dont get the diffetence. With Belgium KdB is the only other player at the same level as him in all honesty but he seems to always play at 100% regardless of position, opposition or his form. Here he can play very very good or very poorly. Recently, not very good. That sort of indifference and inconsistencies, particularly with those poor seasons inbetween title wins, are a very bad sign for a player of his talent.

[Mário César 1,252]

It will be very sad to see Eden leave the club, but we need to understand. Good luck in his next challenge. I think that he will not overcome the expectations, but we will see. 

 

[kellzfresh 7,229]

18 hours ago, Jason said:

With comments like these, it's little wonder that Hazard has never really improved and is just stuck at a good level with little consistency...

https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/8247956/chelsea-hazard-sarri-mourinho-frustrated/

 

 

For example, I prefer a match like the one we just lost to Tottenham — I really got a big kick out of that. Zero assists, zero goals, like against Brazil (2-1 victory for Belgium in quarterfinals of the 2018 World Cup), but those are the kinds of matches that I like, the ones that really make me happy to play football."

We need a new talisman. Regardless of whether he stays or goes, this cannot be the mentality of the best player in our squad. I know people like making excuses for Eden, I like him as a person too, but that quote in my opinion should not be uttered in public. Our best player of the old guard (Lampard) would never have this kind of mentality, and this is why this chelsea side are inconsistent. Because we play well as a team when we're in the mood to put in more effort.  

See? Sarri wasn’t making this up.

[mccg 1,528]

Eden Hazard agrees pre-contract with Real Madrid

https://www.shoot.co.uk/eden-hazard-agrees-pre-contract-with-real-madrid/

[bigbluewillie 1,930]

When I see it from a reliable source then i'll believe it, but atm those reporting it are no bodies and talking total bollocks.

[Arlen Correa 161]

There is no player with similar level that we can sign.

[communicate 2,703]

23 hours ago, Magic Lamps said:

Robertson is defo better than Alonso but TAA is not better than Azpi not even offensively IMO, Azpi gets way too much stick he is usually pretty tidy in offense and a decent crosser. VVD is better than our CBS but David and Rüdiger are better than whoever their 2nd CB is rn. I would say Pedro is better than Shaqiri and maybe slightly worse than Mane but not much. Willian is shit but also not too much worse than Shaqiri who is more of an impact sub used in midfield anyway. Firmino is their main striker and clearly better than what we have but i acknowledged that already. So i remain with my point that we are only slightly worse than them overall, if you take the star players out.

You must be joking or never watch Liverpool play. Even before salah arrive this Liverpool teams looks absolutely scary going forward. Mane is terrific, Firmino fits perfectly with klopp football. The way their front 3 combine is brilliant. Salah make them better because he has transformed into a very good goal getter. 

Offensively Trent is a much2 beterr player than Azpi. There is a reason why Azpi is not startin rb for Spain. Offensively he is not good enough. His passing is good for a CB but but not as a rb He can run but he is not explosive. 

 

[Jase 43,479]

 

[communicate 2,703]

On 1/22/2019 at 6:40 PM, Jason said:

With comments like these, it's little wonder that Hazard has never really improved and is just stuck at a good level with little consistency...

https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/8247956/chelsea-hazard-sarri-mourinho-frustrated/

 

 

I think we have known about this for a while. Hazard is the best player in epl even without the drive to be the best. He is just ridiculously talented. If he can push himself, we will be talking about him with Messi and Ronaldo because he is that good.