Rmpr 8,977 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 I doubt he gets money for being a role model...Then you doubt it wrong, every public figure gets money from sponsors that want them to inspire the consumers.Just ask Armstrong... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yeboii 1,844 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 Then you doubt it wrong, every public figure gets money from sponsors that want them to inspire the consumers.Just ask Armstrong...Not from the club, but from sponsors, that is correct. He is paid to do whatever it needs to legally win every game and he tried, I think he really has a passion for winning and the ball boy just got in the way. Meh whatever, we all know he did nothing to the 17 year old "boy" and he got charged. Rmpr 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mufassir08 2,400 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 FA is an absolute joke. FA=Fucking assholes!!!!!!!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! TacticalBlues 2,817 Posted January 25, 2013 Popular Post! Share Posted January 25, 2013 The same association that had the balls to refer this:3 games is "clearly insufficient" here though: super_frank8, Rambo, Yeboii and 6 others 9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zolayes 14,489 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 Going to be banned for kicking a football. Hilarious... well Torres is safe then mediator 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushman 2,043 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 To be charges for violent conduct by FA is not a trivial matter, I feel.I hate to say this but be prepared to see Hazard banned for 6 - 8 games. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yeboii 1,844 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 The same association that had the balls to refer this:3 games is "clearly insufficient" here though:LOVE THIS POST TacticalBlues and Stingray 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superblue 6,372 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 No he can't,beacuse he has a 3 match ban beacuse of red cardNo his ban hasn't been decided yet and he'll be given the opportunity to answer the charge and/or appeal before it applies.Same happened to JT in racism ban, he coiuld play until the date he had to answer the charges. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jase 43,479 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 No his ban hasn't been decided yet and he'll be given the opportunity to answer the charge and/or appeal before it applies.Same happened to JT in racism ban, he coiuld play until the date he had to answer the charges.No. There's a slight difference. Hazard received a red card for this while Terry didn't for his case. This charge is not about the red card/3-match ban, it's about the possibility of extending it further. So, right now, Hazard will serve the 3-match ban starting from this Sunday no matter what. Remains to be seen whether he will serve more than a 3-match ban(likely to). DONI. and Rmpr 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xPetrCechx 13,571 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 FA (AF) hates Chelsea Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laura90 556 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 Why Eden didn't just elbow him while he was still standing? Kick him not just the ball. Maybe punishment would be more appropriate in that case.The English FA is a dirty and filthy bunch. They sure enjoy the huge amount collected from Chelsea players as fines for every little incident. Feck! Hazard can only be subjected to further blame and punishment by a very biased opinion. I didnt rule out the FA sticking out their ugly heads on Hazard , but its kinda surprising given that the there is naked for all to see. Its so annoying that those who are suppose to look into pricks tweet have decided to turn their blind eyes because its Chelsea. They were busy keeping an eye on Ashleys tweets I suppose. The ball boy got thumbs up for his actions.There is no reson to be suprised, the English Fa is run by the Manures. What a joke! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teignman 441 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 Thats a serious rambling there. What is the crime exactly you are referring to? He did not hit anyone. I do not accept this. It is simply bullshit. When ethics are concerned, this is my field. Sorry to bring this up but I teach this at the university. You can condone people because of a number of reasons: 1. Deontological: did he break an a actual rule - moral or legal. Actually no, when you see the footage. Is there a deontological code broken in his action. No, there is no stipulation of this fact. Consider what Cantona would be liable for in this case .... 2. Consequentionalism: Is there damage done, in hindsight. No. There is nothing there. 3. Virtue ethics: is Hazard someone who promotes the wrong values, does he do stuff that make football look bad. The proof of the pudding is in the eating here: nobody seems to think so, even our opponents. The only value that is being promoted here is that it is actually ok to have ball boys have an effect on the game. Not to even mention the fact of the twitter account or the fact that the ball boysfather has a serious interest in Swansea's performance. 4. Utilitarian (think Jeremy Bentham): what kind of 'utlity ' or good did Hazard prevent from beng the case. None. We lost, even with acions. Conclusion: all the debate is an emotivism debate (Richard Hare if people wanna know/research). It is about what we feel, especially the FA. Not about the question at hand. I am seriously disgusted because of the intellectuall stupidity of what i going on... Also and in addition: an argument that involves our 'pr' or our image is the worst. This is merely big brother level and deserves to be burned , nothing more. Fuck off FA. I will love Chelsea forever. Period.I just wish I could hit the "like this" button more than once after reading your post. It's writing like this that truly enriches this forum: intelligent, relevant, and passionate. Well done sir. Stingray and ZanSnake 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superblue 6,372 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 No. There's a slight difference. Hazard received a red card for this while Terry didn't for his case. This charge is not about the 3-match ban, it's about the possibility of extending it further. So, right now, Hazard will serve the 3-match ban starting from this Sunday no matter what. Remains to be seen whether he will serve more than a 3-match ban(likely to).But surely Chelsea are given the opportunity to appeal against it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stingray 9,441 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 I just wish I could hit the "like this" button more than once after reading your post. It's writing like this that truly enriches this forum: intelligent, relevant, and passionate. Well done sir. You have my thanks, sir Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jase 43,479 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 But surely Chelsea are given the opportunity to appeal against it?Seems like they have made no decision to appeal the red card. Just depends on whether we'll appeal the charge. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weckerz 3,781 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 10 games would cause such a shitstorm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superblue 6,372 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 The FA will get what's coming to them in the long run - it's well known a breakaway league is on the horizons which will fuck the FA up financially. ChelseaFSee and Muzchap 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zolayes 14,489 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 10 games would cause such a shitstormdont think they have the nerve to go that far ,,,the cowards will probably go for extra 3 making 6 in all ..then put on a show of self righteous satisfaction Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDY 1,290 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 The FA have something ridiculous like a 99.5% success rate when faced with an appeal. They don't like to admit they're wrong, even if it's as clear as day. xPetrCechx, super_frank8 and Heisenberg 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hamilton 2,120 Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 Will this have an influence on future of Hazard in EPL once Real starts waving with money?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.