Jump to content

🇧🇪 Eden Hazard


the wes
 Share

Recommended Posts

It wouldn't matter. him fucking off, if we had the calibre of other players in previous seasons. Kovacic and Jorginho never score let alone make assists whereas in the past we could rely on a regular 20 goals a season from one midfielder, Lampard. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LAM09 said:

If the ban doesn't get overturned, I can see him seeing out his contract.

What is £100m~ when you can't do anything with it for 12 months?

Mm, maybe keep the 100M pounds and spend it next year?

No fucking way this happens. We will either make him sign a new contract or sell him. 100 million is too much money, we won't throw it away in the window.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mm, maybe keep the 100M pounds and spend it next year? No fucking way this happens. We will either make him sign a new contract or sell him. 100 million is too much money, we won't throw it away in the window.

 

Just look at the stats above. There's no chance someone steps up with similar numbers, so we don't know what predicament we'll be in next season. 

 

 

Struggling to finish 4th WITH him.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LAM09 said:

Just look at the stats above. There's no chance someone steps up with similar numbers, so we don't know what predicament we'll be in next season.

 

Struggling to finish 4th WITH him.

 

 

Yeah, it will be tough withouth him, no doubt in that, but for 100M pounds we can buy a long term replacement of him or we can spend it on our weak points - LB, striker.

If this break up must happen then we better get that money for him. The club is run by businessmen I am sure we won't let him go for free.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Yeah, it will be tough withouth him, no doubt in that, but for 100M pounds we can buy a long term replacement of him or we can spend it on our weak points - LB, striker.

If this break up must happen then we better get that money for him. The club is run by businessmen I am sure we won't let him go for free.

 

 

He could do us a favour and renew, with an agreement in place. I'm all for the inevitable, but it has to suit both parties.

 

Not to mentioned RM's current situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jason said:

 

I know 100 million is a lot but there is no guarantee we will spend wisely with that money as seen with buying Drinkwater, Bakayoko, Zappacosta etc.

Of course there isn't. But still it's more likely than substitute Hazard from 0 pounds.  We have many old players - Giroud, Pedro, Willian, David Luiz. They will leave soon and we won't recieve too much money for them, so we'll need that Hazard money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jason said:

 

I know 100 million is a lot but there is no guarantee we will spend wisely with that money as seen with buying Drinkwater, Bakayoko, Zappacosta etc.

This why we need to bring in a DOF to stop us from making bad signings 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, LAM09 said:
11 minutes ago, Jason said:
I know 100 million is a lot but there is no guarantee we will spend wisely with that money as seen with buying Drinkwater, Bakayoko, Zappacosta etc.

Exactly. How much has been blown of an American youngster?

I shall refrain myself from responding to that... :ph34r:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Phenomenal tonight and hopefully he's picking up and hitting some key form at a crucial part of the season.

If we lose him next season with a transfer ban it'll be a rough year as we're limited to what we can do.

However even with a transfer window in the summer, I've said previously it's foolish for the club to think we can go out and replace him because we can't. There isn't another player available capable of the creativity that he provides. If we have to sell we need to invest the money in other areas of the squad the same way Liverpool did when they sold Coutinho (specifically buying Van Dijk and Alisson). We need two new full backs and a striker, that's where the Hazard money should go towards investing.

A 20 goal striker would mean we're not looking for one of our wide players to put up similar numbers, and two full backs capable of getting up and down the pitch will provide more width and create more chances than our current full backs at present. It's a case of trying to share out some of the workload that Hazard currently does for the team on his own, rather than expecting to bring someone in who will take up that mantle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

props to Hazard, the bastard is unplayable at times and its a joy to watch, could have had a hattrick against the Hammers, he can be ruthless when he's on his groove, shame he can't be even more consistent otherwise he would be ranked alongside Messi and Ronaldo. I will gutted if he leaves there is no denying it, players like him are rare these days, can he be the greatest Chelsea player ever? if he stays then hell yes he can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...