iseah100 5,612 Posted July 22, 2016 Share Posted July 22, 2016 I remember when I was saying he was the future of our defense and everyone laughed. Now they get all pissy he might be sold. Sent from my SM-G920T using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Styles 9,790 Posted July 22, 2016 Share Posted July 22, 2016 I always thought he had decent pace, nothing mind blowing but certainly not a slouch either. He'll get bugger naturally as he gets older. If in 2-3 years time he is a bit stronger he will be a complete defender. Skipper is absolutely right tho, he can't substitute dexterity and finesse for size and strength. Amblève. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ProXima 11 Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 Bild says that agreement between BMG and CFC is closer and closer. German club give 18M€, but Chelsea want 22M€, probably transfer fee will be 20M€ and contract will have a buy-back clause. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuudiGullit 112 Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 11 minutes ago, ProXima said: Bild says that agreement between BMG and CFC is closer and closer. German club give 18M€, but Chelsea want 22M€, probably transfer fee will be 20M€ and contract will have a buy-back clause. God no this will be a KDB 2.0.... The club would be insanely stupid to sell him. Holy shit.... the wes 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fernando 6,585 Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 4 minutes ago, RuudiGullit said: God no this will be a KDB 2.0.... The club would be insanely stupid to sell him. Holy shit.... It's better to sell just as long we have a buy back clause. Because selling sort of release the responsibility from the owning team. This is what Real does, and works great. Our mistake with Lukaku, KDB was that we didn't put in a buy back clause. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Chels 2,502 Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 Found the article: http://www.bild.de/sport/fussball/borussia-moenchengladbach/bietet-18-millionen-fuer-daenen-ass-47039278.bild.html Can someone translate this paragraph below? Google translate says something about Chelsea being against the sale but then mentions Conte and I don't really understand what it's saying. Quote  Gut für Gladbach: Lange sperrte sich Chelsea komplett gegen den Verkauf des dänischen Abwehrjuwels. Aber Neu-Coach Antonio Conte, der sieben Innenverteidiger im Kader hat, sucht einen weiteren Topmann lieber in der Serie A: Stefan de Vrij von Lazio und Kostas Manolas vom AS Rom sind seine Favoriten.  Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nono 791 Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 1 hour ago, The Chels said: Found the article: http://www.bild.de/sport/fussball/borussia-moenchengladbach/bietet-18-millionen-fuer-daenen-ass-47039278.bild.html Can someone translate this paragraph below? Google translate says something about Chelsea being against the sale but then mentions Conte and I don't really understand what it's saying.  It says : "The Chelsea Board sell yet another one of their talented prospects, while retaining mediocre players on high salaries. Conte is unhappy. Lazio and Roma and Manolas are laughing. Gladbach delighted." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Chels 2,502 Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 2 minutes ago, nono said: It says : "The Chelsea Board sell yet another one of their talented prospects, while retaining mediocre players on high salaries. Conte is unhappy. Lazio and Roma and Manolas are laughing. Gladbach delighted."  Igi26 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pizy 18,909 Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 Sell a potential star young CB (a position we're dire in) and persist with Ivanovic, Cahill, and a significantly declined JT. Yep, that would be a Chelsea ass move alright. TheIceMan 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xPetrCechx 13,570 Posted July 29, 2016 Share Posted July 29, 2016 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abreu03 292 Posted July 29, 2016 Share Posted July 29, 2016 I thought the De Bruyne would serve as an example, apparently that's not what happened. blueblood22 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Artandur 939 Posted July 29, 2016 Share Posted July 29, 2016 11 hours ago, The Chels said: Found the article: http://www.bild.de/sport/fussball/borussia-moenchengladbach/bietet-18-millionen-fuer-daenen-ass-47039278.bild.html Can someone translate this paragraph below? Google translate says something about Chelsea being against the sale but then mentions Conte and I don't really understand what it's saying.  It says that chelsea was against the sale for a long time, but conte has come in and wants to buy a new top-class CB from serie A right now, so the club is apparently willing to sell christensen. The Chels 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fernando 6,585 Posted July 29, 2016 Share Posted July 29, 2016 8 hours ago, Abreu03 said: I thought the De Bruyne would serve as an example, apparently that's not what happened. We have buy putting a buy back clause. We can sell as many young players as we want as long as we have this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Chels 2,502 Posted July 29, 2016 Share Posted July 29, 2016 5 minutes ago, Artandur said: It says that chelsea was against the sale for a long time, but conte has come in and wants to buy a new top-class CB from serie A right now, so the club is apparently willing to sell christensen. Thanks Artandur 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blues.bridge 343 Posted July 29, 2016 Share Posted July 29, 2016 yeah, it's better sell christiensen and other of ours best young,instead to sell ivanovic,mikel,remy,moses,cuadrado,piazon,pedro .... no comment! xPetrCechx 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue_Fox_ 2,086 Posted July 29, 2016 Share Posted July 29, 2016 If this happens I'll be one Conte sacking away from feeling completely detached. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yipo 56 Posted July 29, 2016 Share Posted July 29, 2016 buy back cause never guarantee the player want come back. fuck the board Essien19 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rapkun 668 Posted July 29, 2016 Share Posted July 29, 2016 It's actually fine if there's a buy-back clause included. The club gets money to balance the books and the player can focus on his new club and developpement. Buy-back clause does not guarantee the player will return but it guarantees that the other club will not resist the sale. Besides, not too long ago the player himself said playing as a regular for Chelsea would be a dream. Fernando 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tautvix 1,321 Posted July 29, 2016 Share Posted July 29, 2016 I like the idea of buy-back clause. If after a few seasons he turns out to be one of the best defenders around we can probably take him back. I he is a failure for other club we should not mind because we already got good amount of money for him. Fernando 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Artandur 939 Posted July 29, 2016 Share Posted July 29, 2016 If the clause would be limited to 2-3 years and we'd have zouma and koulibaly in full force at that point, i dont see him wanting to come back, though... That is, if we manage to sign koulibaly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.