Jump to content

Non-Chelsea Transfer Pub


Hamilton
 Share

Recommended Posts

http://weaintgotnohistory.sbnation.com/2015/1/12/7527747/chelsea-financial-accounts-ffp

this is scary.

65 mil profit from player sales and yet we got a profit of "only" 18mil. dont think we are buying anyone before we sell a couple. and if that schurlle 30mil euros thing is true, we should definitely be selling him.

also,

  • Chelsea spent £152.7m on player acquisitions.
    how is this possible. schurrle (19), mvg (8), willian (30), etoo (2), atsu (3.5), cuevas (2mil), matic (21), zouma (12.5), salah (11), pasalic (3) is close to 112 mil. how is it said to be 40mil more.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://weaintgotnohistory.sbnation.com/2015/1/12/7527747/chelsea-financial-accounts-ffp

this is scary.

65 mil profit from player sales and yet we got a profit of "only" 18mil. dont think we are buying anyone before we sell a couple. and if that schurlle 30mil euros thing is true, we should definitely be selling him.

also,

  • Chelsea spent £152.7m on player acquisitions.

    how is this possible. schurrle (19), mvg (8), willian (30), etoo (2), atsu (3.5), cuevas (2mil), matic (21), zouma (12.5), salah (11), pasalic (3) is close to 112 mil. how is it said to be 40mil more.

Real Madrid is like 500m in minus, doesnt stop them from buying, does it? Having 18m of profit is great, we were in minus for many many years. Im sure we can afford to spend around 100m during jan and summer (not saying we will). Besides, we have many players who will be sold probably like Romeu, Marin, Moses, Bertrand, Schurrle/Salah, Thorgan?,...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://weaintgotnohistory.sbnation.com/2015/1/12/7527747/chelsea-financial-accounts-ffp

this is scary.

65 mil profit from player sales and yet we got a profit of "only" 18mil. dont think we are buying anyone before we sell a couple. and if that schurlle 30mil euros thing is true, we should definitely be selling him.

also,

  • Chelsea spent £152.7m on player acquisitions.

    how is this possible. schurrle (19), mvg (8), willian (30), etoo (2), atsu (3.5), cuevas (2mil), matic (21), zouma (12.5), salah (11), pasalic (3) is close to 112 mil. how is it said to be 40mil more.

2 options: either lies or (more likely) agent and signing on fees are included.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 options: either lies or (more likely) agent and signing on fees are included.

http://swissramble.blogspot.co.uk/2015/01/chelsea-hey-hey-my-my-into-black.html

this one makes far more sense and the figures are far more closer to what we would expect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Real Madrid is like 500m in minus, doesnt stop them from buying, does it? Having 18m of profit is great, we were in minus for many many years. Im sure we can afford to spend around 100m during jan and summer (not saying we will). Besides, we have many players who will be sold probably like Romeu, Marin, Moses, Bertrand, Schurrle/Salah, Thorgan?,...

yup. fair enough. but we will have to sell a lot of these bit part players to make enough room for the likes of pogba and a new CB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pogba and Varane are at the top of my list. Terry should be good for another season, and I'd like to see more of Zouma, but I'm reluctant to trust Cahill at the moment.

I like Ramires, but he'd probably be the one to go to make room.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Besiktas president says he's been to the bridge to negotiate the transfer of a Chelsea player.

Most probably bullshit but this just might be the meeting that @We Hate Scouse was talking about.

a couple of respectable newspapers mentioned salah on loan to besiktas?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Besiktas president says he's been to the bridge to negotiate the transfer of a Chelsea player.

Most probably bullshit but this just might be the meeting that @We Hate Scouse was talking about.

Besiktas president watching our match against Newcastle:

B7Vfn90CUAEEuaj.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Besiktas president says he's been to the bridge to negotiate the transfer of a Chelsea player.

Most probably bullshit but this just might be the meeting that @We Hate Scouse was talking about.

It's not bullshit, it is true. The news has been published long time ago, with Besiktas president quoted interview.

As part of our partnership (since Ba transfer I believe), they interested to take some our players on loan. Probably that's the reason why they are on Newcastle match.

I doubt it has something to do with what WHS said, it is not that 'secret' anymore :lol:

Sorry, couldn't provide the links at the moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You