Jump to content

Non-Chelsea Transfer Pub


Hamilton
 Share

Recommended Posts

--------anyone but torres----------

hazard(35mil)----- Mata-------robben(20mil)

-----mceachren----------rameries---------

no clue-----luiz-----cahil-----iva----

-----------cech(wish it was courtois though)----

4-2-3-1 . possibly cavani as cf; one can dream surley.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do you think that we need DM? In my opinion Ramires, Essien, Romeu and Mikel are on the same level, maybe better than Tiote...In addition his deal end in 2016/2017 season and we have to pay I think at least 10 milions for him...What we really need are some high quality wingers like Hazard

Mikel is better than Tiote, sort it out mate, you honeslty can't watch other players in the premier league, he's currently better than Essien, and im one of the biggest Essien fanatics you'll get on this forum, and Ramires isn't a dm, can play there but he's alternate, and Tiote is a better dm than him, but not a better player. 10 million for Tiote, i would have that any day, i recently heard about his contract so it's a shame cause i thought we could of robbed them for less, but 10 million is a great deal, he's 25 as well don't forget, quality player, and Essien looks finished to me, might be very worth considering, and yeah Mikel needs to piss off, and we don't know what's going on with Romeu, i think he would be a great addition to the first team, and the SQUAD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know I'm annoying with this, but what do you guys think of loaning Dzeko with an option to sign? I heard City might be getting even more forwards, and if Mancini stays , I have a feeling Dzeko is out since he doesn't fit their style of play and formation.

He could be perfect for us.

Dzeko is a quality player, always rated him, the reason he's not standing out at City is because it's hard for him to stand out, he's still getting used to the team though, he should of scored more i must admit.

But i think he would be great for us, he's got good movement and good finishing (but kind of inconsistent at it too, he's like Adebayor, but doesn't miss like 3 sitters a game then scores the next). But what i like him for mainly is his other skills, goalscoring is his secondary abillity in my opinion, he's better at passing, crossing etc, good player, and can work well with others. I would sign him on loan, and i would sign him if we could get him for 20 million, but nothing more, and if City want rid of him or if he wants to go cause he's not getting enough time, then i can see City wanting loads.

Even when Tevez was disrupting the team, they were still stubborn, they rejected a 30 million bid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mikel is better than Tiote, sort it out mate, you honeslty can't watch other players in the premier league, he's currently better than Essien, and im one of the biggest Essien fanatics you'll get on this forum, and Ramires isn't a dm, can play there but he's alternate, and Tiote is a better dm than him, but not a better player. 10 million for Tiote, i would have that any day, i recently heard about his contract so it's a shame cause i thought we could of robbed them for less, but 10 million is a great deal, he's 25 as well don't forget, quality player, and Essien looks finished to me, might be very worth considering, and yeah Mikel needs to piss off, and we don't know what's going on with Romeu, i think he would be a great addition to the first team, and the SQUAD.

I would agree with most of this. Unlike a lot of players, he puts in a shift almost every game, but can still finish whats on his plate. Like I said, he's managed to find the net handsomely even with subpar service from the greedy mercs at City.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reports from spain today that Madrid want to loan out Nuri Sahin. I'd snatch him up in a second. An excellent and creative midfielder.

Would they really loan to a club like Chelsea, or heck, would we even accept a player on loan?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would they really loan to a club like Chelsea, or heck, would we even accept a player on loan?

Why ever not? He is not getting any minutes at Madrid and he would most likely walk into our side, and we sure could use a player like him. It's win-win situation imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why ever not? He is not getting any minutes at Madrid and he would most likely walk into our side, and we sure could use a player like him. It's win-win situation imo.

Yeah I guess. But Madrid aren't the type that loan to the big clubs, they'll probably send him out to Espanyol or some smaller club like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I guess. But Madrid aren't the type that loan to the big clubs, they'll probably send him out to Espanyol or some smaller club like that.

I think he would get much more experience with chelsea playing along the likes of Lampard and co.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Forget Dzeko. Bring in the other Bosnian diamond in Pjanic and I would be delighted!

I don't think we need Pjanic. Pjanic is similar to Mata, we need more of deep-lying playmaker like Modrić.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think we need Pjanic. Pjanic is similar to Mata, we need more of deep-lying playmaker like Modrić.

If Mata gets injured, then what? Both can play on the flanks. Play them in a 4-2-3-1 and give them the license to alternate their positions in a game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually Pjanic is perfect, he plays a deep-lying playmaker for the NT. Younger version of Modric with a bigger ceiling IMO. Doubt Roma would let him go for cheap after that steal they got him for. 17 mil. euros minimum.

Mata on the wing, Pjanic as the AMF.. that could work as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...