brimstone 35 Posted October 5, 2011 Share Posted October 5, 2011 maybe.....THE TSAR STADIUM ROMANS STADIA WHY CANT IT STILL BE CALLED STAMFORD BRIDGE ( sponsored by)>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Does the SB name have to disappear Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.F. 1,484 Posted October 5, 2011 Share Posted October 5, 2011 stop posting stupid names. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ulsterchelsea 3,221 Posted October 5, 2011 Share Posted October 5, 2011 Go speak to Oxfordblues and ask him why he has not renewed his season ticket, then you can ask people who have gone to every home game since the 80's and now they have been priced out. Only the millionaire business men can go the game now, the real working class fan has no chance. That is why i want them to fucking bring some lube down to the negotiation table and to give them some umfffffffffff ! I say fucking £2000 pounds a share or a free season ticket for all of them for saving the club ? with Away games included ? 5 years season ticket ! didn't really answer the question tho.I sympathize wholly with fans, god knows when I travel it costs enough but I don't see trying to fleece the club as a viable option for anyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badboy 1,526 Posted October 5, 2011 Share Posted October 5, 2011 didn't really answer the question tho.I sympathize wholly with fans, god knows when I travel it costs enough but I don't see trying to fleece the club as a viable option for anyone.I do because they do ! Call it a refund Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matty18 15 Posted October 5, 2011 Share Posted October 5, 2011 it may be named something else officially. But to fans it will always be stamford bridge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liquidator 5,176 Posted October 5, 2011 Share Posted October 5, 2011 would it matter if it was called 'Samsung Arena' or similar? To us it would still be Stamford Bridge or Nine Elms or Battersea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liquidator 5,176 Posted October 5, 2011 Share Posted October 5, 2011 I can see a lot of you saying that it should be called Stamford Bridge. I disagree for the simple reason that it would not be Stamford Bridge. It would not be that plot of land next to the Fulham road and 2 train lines if you get what I mean. We would be calling it something that it just is not. Arsenal did not call their new stadium Highbury, City did not call their new stadium Maine Road. It would seem like we are saying that it would be the same stadium that we have played in for 106 years Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave30 728 Posted October 5, 2011 Share Posted October 5, 2011 I can see a lot of you saying that it should be called Stamford Bridge. I disagree for the simple reason that it would not be Stamford Bridge. It would not be that plot of land next to the Fulham road and 2 train lines if you get what I mean. We would be calling it something that it just is not. Arsenal did not call their new stadium Highbury, City did not call their new stadium Maine Road. It would seem like we are saying that it would be the same stadium that we have played in for 106 yearsi agree . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melanicus 5,208 Posted October 5, 2011 Share Posted October 5, 2011 Can Roman just build a home for those people who live around Bridge and than increase it's capacity? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHOULO19 24,332 Posted October 5, 2011 Share Posted October 5, 2011 I know on a sentimental level most fans don't want to move from the bridge, and I agree with them, but I also think that it is very important, with the financial fair play rules coming to effect, to get a stadium with a bigger capacity if we want to compete in the future. That's why I don't mind Samsung Arena being the home of Chelsea FC if it brings us a few trophies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eldo 868 Posted October 5, 2011 Share Posted October 5, 2011 I can see a lot of you saying that it should be called Stamford Bridge. I disagree for the simple reason that it would not be Stamford Bridge. It would not be that plot of land next to the Fulham road and 2 train lines if you get what I mean. We would be calling it something that it just is not. Arsenal did not call their new stadium Highbury, City did not call their new stadium Maine Road. It would seem like we are saying that it would be the same stadium that we have played in for 106 yearsYou're right, but the new name should have a meaning behind it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spike 12,049 Posted October 7, 2011 Share Posted October 7, 2011 Royal Hospital Flower Show Stamford Bridge Park Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TomCFC 357 Posted October 7, 2011 Share Posted October 7, 2011 Can Roman just build a home for those people who live around Bridge and than increase it's capacity?It's not easy to knock peoples' houses down, no matter how much money you have! Redeveloping SB isn't really an option, unfortunately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueLion. 21,491 Posted October 7, 2011 Share Posted October 7, 2011 I can see a lot of you saying that it should be called Stamford Bridge. I disagree for the simple reason that it would not be Stamford Bridge. It would not be that plot of land next to the Fulham road and 2 train lines if you get what I mean. We would be calling it something that it just is not. Arsenal did not call their new stadium Highbury, City did not call their new stadium Maine Road. It would seem like we are saying that it would be the same stadium that we have played in for 106 yearsI'm saying it because I don't want to move, but I agree with you entirely otherwise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaoulQuaresma7 16 Posted October 7, 2011 Share Posted October 7, 2011 Blue Heaven Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brimstone 35 Posted October 7, 2011 Share Posted October 7, 2011 Wot about.....BLUELANDS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Armour 4,557 Posted October 7, 2011 Share Posted October 7, 2011 Wot about.....BLUELANDSCity are trying to copy us...not the other way around... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amblève. 4,995 Posted October 7, 2011 Share Posted October 7, 2011 What about "I don't give a fuck about what the new name's gonna be cause there's never gonna be a stadium like our Bridge"?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badboy 1,526 Posted October 7, 2011 Share Posted October 7, 2011 A bigger stadium will just dilute the fans noise and it will not be a fortress until we settle in and that could take 20 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laylabelle 9,586 Posted October 7, 2011 Share Posted October 7, 2011 Even if the name changes cant see many people referring it to anything but Stamford Bridge'Im off to the Samsung Staduim' or whatever doesnt sound the same.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now