Romelu Lukaku

[The Skipper 20,609]

3 hours ago, the wes said:

This forum makes me lol at times 1st it was Michael Emenalo fault now it's Marina Granovskaia fault fs lads make your mind up 

Emenalo was largely wrongly accused. Marina actually heads negotiations. Since she's taken over that role from Gourlay we've been pretty rubbish in the market. 

[Leif 6,006]

She negotiates - she doesn't target the players, 'he' does; and it's our targets who are sub-par, not anyone's fees, nor the excellent amount of money we've been getting from our sales. There's no heat or microscope to put on her.

[The Skipper 20,609]

6 minutes ago, Leif said:

She negotiates - she doesn't target the players, 'he' does; and it's our targets who are sub-par, not anyone's fees, nor the excellent amount of money we've been getting from our sales. There's no heat or microscope to put on her.

Sure. Let's assume this logic is true for a second. Bakayoko, Sandro, Lukaku are all poor, sub par players. Pogba and Stones in 15/16 as well - really poor players to target. 

Let's ignore the fact that since Gourlay left, we have been extremely meek in the transfer window. 

[communicate 2,703]

It looks like he is joining United.

Not sure it is a good thing or a bad thing, it all depend who we are getting

[Bernard N Y Burgesson 139]

14 minutes ago, RoyalBlues said:

When he leave Juve for MU? exactly like Lukaku case, they paid overprice for him. Never worth 89m. The true value is set automatically after some time. If now he want to leave MU, his price will go down for sure, also because the player want the move.

Again, don't see any relationship with completely different player in completely different country involving two completely different clubs.

No it is the exact same thing. Lukaku wants the move. Verratti wants the move too.  If u can explain pogba you can explain verratti. Funny enough all our midfielders 

All involve different teams from different countries. So I am not sure what you mean.

[zekinjo 449]

It's been exactly one month since we started negotiations with our targets. Next Monday players are coming back from their vacations. 

[Clockwork 1,794]

7 minutes ago, The Skipper said:

Emenalo was largely wrongly accused. Marina actually heads negotiations. Since she's taken over that role from Gourlay we've been pretty rubbish in the market. 

I don't believe Marina decides how much Chelsea can pay for a player. She negotiates, she doesn't decide how much Chelsea can pay for a player. The board as a group decides how much they are willing to pay for a player. And it is her job to negotiate that aligns with those views. 

[xPetrCechx 13,570]

Chelsea's terrible summer: 7 things that have gone wrong for Antonio Conte since winning the Premier League

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/chelsea-premier-league-summer-transfer-10749071

[the wes 7,212]

I wonder how much Mino Raiola get outta the lukaku deal utd have made Mino Raiola a rich man 

[RoyalBlues 4,050]

10 minutes ago, Bernard N Y Burgesson said:

No it is the exact same thing. Lukaku wants the move. Verratti wants the move to. If u can explain pogba you can explain verratti. 

All involve different teams from different countries. So I am not sure what you mean.

The deal involving MU for sure has any effect, for their sake themselves. Don't see any point why Verratti from PSG to Barca has any connection with Pogba or Lukaku deal, involving Juve, MU and Everton in the first place.

Mind you Everton has accepted the bid, not the player has agreed personal term or something. Yes, he want to leave, but he hasn't tell he will want to join MU yet. What I've wrote is when the player has expressed his desire to move to certain club, it will change the price when that club make a bid.

[Bernard N Y Burgesson 139]

1 hour ago, RoyalBlues said:

No way he is 60m player. Everton bought him 28m from us, unless he win PL title every year for Everton since then, no way his valuation went up that high. Everton set the price take it or leave it price and with his agent help, MU bite the bait, lol. It should not have any effect on other deals at all. Again, that is happened on their own world.

What you are saying does not make sense. If it was in this transfer market that we sold lukaku to everton, we would have probably sold for not less that 40m so I don't get it when people say he is not worth it when he has had 3yrs of first team football. 

This is the idea of Chelsea fc. If they could get their loanees to get playing time like Lukaku has done we would have been selling the likes of atsu traore and Ake for 30m each in this transfer market. Example after Christensen's 2yr loan Chelsea is said to be only interested in bid above 30m for him from inter Milan who have shown interest. 

So let face the music as a club and stop pussying around.

[the wes 7,212]

😂 😂 😂 lol

[RoyalBlues 4,050]

7 minutes ago, Bernard N Y Burgesson said:

What you are saying does not make sense. If it was in this transfer market that we sold lukaku to everton, we would have probably sold for not less that 40m so I don't when people say he is not worth it when he has had 3yrs of first team football. 

This is the idea of Chelsea fc. If they could get their loaned to get playing time like Lukaku has done we would have been selling the likes of atsu traore and Ake for 30m each in this transfer market.

So let face the music as a club and stop pussying around.

Lol, too much assumptions in there, that I couldn't understand what is your point.

Read all the reaction in social media and most agree that Lukaku not worth 75m. End of.

[oldportblue 547]

all you guys saying in here lukaku isn't worth X or Y amounts... a player is worth what someone is willing to pay for him, and with the new tv money and players going for inflated prices everywhere, it's natural that prices for top players skyrocket, it's supply and demand

[xPetrCechx 13,570]

600 Pages?

Cristiano Ronaldo, is it you?