Ollie 4,400 Posted August 13, 2011 Share Posted August 13, 2011 He'd be better for us than Modric, although i think he was hugely over rated in his first 2 seasons in the prem, he had a great season last year and certainly makes more assists and scores more goals than Modric. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spike 12,049 Posted August 13, 2011 Share Posted August 13, 2011 He was better at Marseille. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ollie 4,400 Posted August 13, 2011 Share Posted August 13, 2011 Most people would be better in the French league. That's why pastore went there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingEssien 127 Posted August 14, 2011 Share Posted August 14, 2011 http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,12876_7100706,00.html"Not that I'm interested, but you have (Samir) Nasri terminating contract. He's one of the most exciting players in the Premier League and that's the reality, as well as Luka, as well as other players" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueLion. 21,491 Posted August 14, 2011 Share Posted August 14, 2011 He wouldn't mention him unless he was in for him, unless that's AVB's first moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluezola 7 Posted August 14, 2011 Share Posted August 14, 2011 Just another player that Chelsea won't buy maybe because he's younger, creative and better than Kalou, Malouda and Anelka. Chelsea need to shift these players for players with Nasir hunger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy. 2,742 Posted August 16, 2011 Share Posted August 16, 2011 http://www.fanatix.com/news/chelsea-steal-ahead-of-man-city-in-race-for-arsenal-star-105/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bababoom 4,478 Posted August 16, 2011 Share Posted August 16, 2011 Fanatix again... I think they may be worse than goal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manpe 10,861 Posted August 16, 2011 Share Posted August 16, 2011 http://www.fanatix.c...senal-star-105/fanatix, but it sounds plausible, especially now that AVB has publicly mentioned his name. I would take him, better than nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gianfranco_Z 202 Posted August 16, 2011 Share Posted August 16, 2011 Fuck it, we might aswell try! Will be cheaper than Modric, and Nasri will add that spark that we look like we're lacking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bababoom 4,478 Posted August 16, 2011 Share Posted August 16, 2011 Fuck it, we might aswell try! Will be cheaper than Modric, and Nasri will add that spark that we look like we're lacking. True, but I was checking the arsenal forumAnd many of them was actually saying that nasri only played well for them for about 6 months. I don't know If they're bitter or what, but hope he's not a Malouda clone, play good for a bit then go back to playing bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.F. 1,484 Posted August 16, 2011 Share Posted August 16, 2011 if we sign him are we going to use him like winger or playmaker ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gianfranco_Z 202 Posted August 16, 2011 Share Posted August 16, 2011 True, but I was checking the arsenal forumAnd many of them was actually saying that nasri only played well for them for about 6 months. I don't know If they're bitter or what, but hope he's not a Malouda clone, play good for a bit then go back to playing bad.Probably the same bitter Arsenal fans that were going "Oh Cesc can go, he hasn't done that much for us recently anyway".Nasri is a class act and I'm sure playing in a team with the firepower of Chelsea would do him wonders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLionheart 516 Posted August 16, 2011 Share Posted August 16, 2011 Nasri is good enough for arsenal or liverpool but not chelsea and Btw enough with getting a winger to play as a CM , and a SS to play as WF and a CB to play as a RB , etc. .We certainly need a CM but not another converted one and i am sure there is a lot of better options even if modric doesn't come we will just have to dig deeper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheva. 5,373 Posted August 16, 2011 Share Posted August 16, 2011 Nasri is good enough for arsenal or liverpool but not chelseaI agree True, but I was checking the arsenal forumAnd many of them was actually saying that nasri only played well for them for about 6 months. I don't know If they're bitter or what, but hope he's not a Malouda clone, play good for a bit then go back to playing bad.No that's actually the truth lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joker10 946 Posted August 16, 2011 Share Posted August 16, 2011 True, but I was checking the arsenal forumAnd many of them was actually saying that nasri only played well for them for about 6 months. I don't know If they're bitter or what, but hope he's not a Malouda clone, play good for a bit then go back to playing bad.That is the truth Nasri has only been good for six months, i am truly baffled how highly some Chelsea fans rate Nasri. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beast 85 Posted August 16, 2011 Share Posted August 16, 2011 Bring him in! Don't met him go to Citeh! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MetsajCFC 1,255 Posted August 16, 2011 Share Posted August 16, 2011 I don't want him here, I'm sure he is a great player but I'd rather buy from smaller teams like Spurs ( ) than getting players straight from rivals. True, Arsenal wouldn't use that money to invest in proper players and thus wouldn't be such a threat but still it feels wrong to cheer on former rival players. Took time with Torres although lets hope he keeps it up. He was fantastic.We missed out on AGÜERO. That guy is a gem, young and built for EPL. Let's really hope that the display against Swansea was moment of brilliance rather than weekly basis showdown. Just check the City-Swansea highlights. And all of the guys here who said he wouldn't fit into 4-3-3 system - they played with Silva, Dzeko and Agüero. (although I think City play with 2 up front, Silva just behind but we surely would have found a way to accommodate him) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHOULO19 24,332 Posted August 16, 2011 Share Posted August 16, 2011 That is the truth Nasri has only been good for six months, i am truly baffled how highly some Chelsea fans rate Nasri.It's true he only played good for six month, but during that he showed real class and great quality...that doesn't just go away, besides he's still young and can grow a lot as a player.I'd choose him over Modric any day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHOULO19 24,332 Posted August 16, 2011 Share Posted August 16, 2011 I really hope that AVB mentioning him means that we're getting him. Problem is there are only 2 weeks left on the transfer market and with no real links in the media, we either haven't started negotiating with him, or we did but are being uncharacteristically quiet about it. (I'm hoping for the second option.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts