Samir Nasri to have Man City medical

[Ollie 4,400]

He'd be better for us than Modric, although i think he was hugely over rated in his first 2 seasons in the prem, he had a great season last year and certainly makes more assists and scores more goals than Modric.

[Spike 12,049]

He was better at Marseille.

[Ollie 4,400]

Most people would be better in the French league. That's why pastore went there.

[KingEssien 127]

http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,12876_7100706,00.html

"Not that I'm interested, but you have (Samir) Nasri terminating contract. He's one of the most exciting players in the Premier League and that's the reality, as well as Luka, as well as other players"

[BlueLion. 21,491]

He wouldn't mention him unless he was in for him, unless that's AVB's first moment.

[bluezola 7]

Just another player that Chelsea won't buy maybe because he's younger, creative and better than Kalou, Malouda and Anelka. Chelsea need to shift these players for players with Nasir hunger.

[Billy. 2,742]

http://www.fanatix.com/news/chelsea-steal-ahead-of-man-city-in-race-for-arsenal-star-105/

[bababoom 4,478]

Fanatix again... I think they may be worse than goal.

[manpe 10,861]

http://www.fanatix.c...senal-star-105/

fanatix, but it sounds plausible, especially now that AVB has publicly mentioned his name. I would take him, better than nothing.

[Gianfranco_Z 202]

Fuck it, we might aswell try! Will be cheaper than Modric, and Nasri will add that spark that we look like we're lacking.

[bababoom 4,478]

Fuck it, we might aswell try! Will be cheaper than Modric, and Nasri will add that spark that we look like we're lacking.

True, but I was checking the arsenal forum

And many of them was actually saying that nasri only played well for them for about 6 months. I don't know If they're bitter or what, but hope he's not a Malouda clone, play good for a bit then go back to playing bad.

[J.F. 1,484]

if we sign him are we going to use him like winger or playmaker ?

[Gianfranco_Z 202]

True, but I was checking the arsenal forum

And many of them was actually saying that nasri only played well for them for about 6 months. I don't know If they're bitter or what, but hope he's not a Malouda clone, play good for a bit then go back to playing bad.

Probably the same bitter Arsenal fans that were going "Oh Cesc can go, he hasn't done that much for us recently anyway".

Nasri is a class act and I'm sure playing in a team with the firepower of Chelsea would do him wonders.

[BLionheart 516]

Nasri is good enough for arsenal or liverpool but not chelsea and Btw enough with getting a winger to play as a CM , and a SS to play as WF and a CB to play as a RB , etc. .

We certainly need a CM but not another converted one and i am sure there is a lot of better options even if modric doesn't come we will just have to dig deeper.

[Sheva. 5,373]

Nasri is good enough for arsenal or liverpool but not chelsea

I agree

True, but I was checking the arsenal forum

And many of them was actually saying that nasri only played well for them for about 6 months. I don't know If they're bitter or what, but hope he's not a Malouda clone, play good for a bit then go back to playing bad.

No that's actually the truth lol.