Fernando

A younger Eto'o would have been amazing because of his link up play. Today three forwards I can think of are good like that. Rooney, Agüero and Suarez. Don't think we will get anyone of those. So it looks like Costa it is with some other squad striker like Bony coming in.

Terry cried after the cl defeat and a lot of opposing fans laugh at the sight of that.

EXCLUSIVE: John Terry to extend Chelsea stay after agreeing to HALVE his £160k-a-week wage http://www.dailystar.co.uk/sport/football/377521/EXCLUSIVE-John-Terry-to-extend-Chelsea-stay-after-agreeing-to-HALVE-his-160k-a-week-wage

Can we break the bank for Suarez? How much will he go for? 80 million pounds?

I would have no complaints with that. That is good business. Get two young CB in and get someone like Javi that can also play both roles ala David Luiz. Just like above, I will be in heaven if this is true. Use younger players to come in. But Ramires, I don't like him for a starter. I rather use the money and get another top midfielder. While bringing those other younger players in.

Carragher is close to tears having to analyse the game. Sweeeeeeeeeet!!!!!!!!!

It only makes sense if you use the money to buy someone better. For CB, Terry at 33 ain't getting younger you know? Ramires, seriously? I rather keep DL then Ramires. So let's see if we get a good CB or a good CM.

can actually pinpoint when he break his heart

Disappointed with this if true. First Mata, then David Luiz. I still support Mourinho, but if next season we are still dog shit......

I don't know, this is too big of a mystery to left unsolved. Best called the Hardly Boys

I think this summer we shall see if this is true, that Roman has indeed changed his mind about sexy Fútbol. Cause if Mourinho is bitching and moaning about the players we have in the second season then it has not changed. Next season without a doubt is going to be pivotal for this project.

I think the main gripe for me is that people never defended the managers back then like they do now for Mourinho. That Mourinho need "his type of players" to do any good. Well why the hell didn't we say that for the past managers? That Carlo needed "his type of players" to be successful. It all boils down to what AVB said, I'm good because I have a good team. As soon as I have a bad team I will be the shit one. Now granted you need a little tactical nuance and man management skills to succeed in this business but having the right type of players is important! So my question is, if we need a manager to have "his type of players" to do good, then why Roman and the board have one philosophy and Mourinho has another? Cause clearly players like Mata, and KDB never suited his style. But to the board did. Something just doesn't add up.

Yes consistency. Last two years have not been consistency. That's why for me Mourinho has to put his money where his mouth is next season. He said this season is transition, fair enough. We agreed on all. He says next season we are going to be title challengers from the beginning, fair enough. We agreed on all.

Oh okay you meant big games only. Fair point. Results point to that, but it seems like last two seasons he has been out though by klopp and simeone in the biggest game of them all. So does that makes them now big game specialist now? No not for me, just that every year little things can impact the game.

Just like Mourinho been out though by smaller team and blaming the ref for certain games? You can't have a double standard measure man. With the same rules you measure, that will be also measured against.

Not to mention that when we face Inter in the CL, the ref screwed us over with many calls. So we don't say nothing because it was a Mourinho team, but if it was against Barcelona the conspiracy theory abound.

Talkchelsea past 24 hours:

Yes it gets a bit boring sometimes all this back and forth but there's no problem you defending what you believe in. As well there's no problem with those that defend their idea when they criticized Mourinho. It was actually a comedy show going through the last few pages. :-) What I don't agree on is you having a go at people because they don't go to games. Totally uncool and uncalled for.

Would not mind having Lampard in Sky to rival Garry and Jaime. Need a proper Chels there!

I love you, marry me now!

It's because we lost. A lot of little kids here are left feeling depressed, angry, confuse and all that. Has been a while since we won nothing in a season. Even in shit seasons we won something, but what the heck that's how this sport is. I will vouch for this, we was a more likable team under Carlo. That first season brought massive respect towards us. Pity what happened to him second season. He should have had the money that AVB, RDM and Mourinho are getting to rebuild the team. Roman took the juice punch out of him and left him to dry. smh.

From an interview? What are you talking about? I'm talking about attitude on the field! You misunderstand me men.

No it's the same. Some games we played like gods, and others played like shit. Too much inconsistency in both seasons.

How is that? Enlighten me into how such attitude does not matter?