I think the main gripe for me is that people never defended the managers back then like they do now for Mourinho. That Mourinho need "his type of players" to do any good. Well why the hell didn't we say that for the past managers? That Carlo needed "his type of players" to be successful. It all boils down to what AVB said, I'm good because I have a good team. As soon as I have a bad team I will be the shit one. Now granted you need a little tactical nuance and man management skills to succeed in this business but having the right type of players is important! So my question is, if we need a manager to have "his type of players" to do good, then why Roman and the board have one philosophy and Mourinho has another? Cause clearly players like Mata, and KDB never suited his style. But to the board did. Something just doesn't add up.