Fernando

With Maresca we would have done better against PSG.

Don't understand this? So what is the fine from?

As I said why bother with the next manager. I told you guys that when you went from Pochetino to Maresca and then sack Maresca it shows they know nothing. How you get rid of Poch to get Maresca for 5 years and then say no he is not the guy and get Liam for 6 years and now he is not the guy. No point in paying much attention to what these clowns do, weather it be coaches or players. They are as bad as Spurs management.

Yes we are going down the spurs road, and it's all the fault of management. They can sack manager often but don't take responsibility for the their idiotic decisions. Spurs also won the EL and a good management would build on that but they destroy their chances as we have done after last summer I agree with @Vesperthis group that bought us will now not care about the situation and will look just to sell, sell, sell after year 6 or so.

As I said Maresca was doing good, look how we did against Barcelona as well. He knew how to set us up for big games. The fools are the board think that is not the manager that helps with that, but the players themselves and any manager would do good. The problem is that is always 50-50. Good players as well a good coach. To me Maresca showed enough to get more time and help improve the squad. Now we are back to tryeing everyone to see how it works and it will be continuing like that because we will sack Liam and get a new manager that wants to try everyone.

This is why I wanted to continue with Maresca but just back him in the defense. No they did not, just get rid of the manager and the new manager tries the same stuff thinking he can change things, like with Jorgensen. That experieiment we already knew, but because he is a new manager he nees to try everyone to see for himself. Really a waste of time, this board is the worst. They think changing the manager will resolve the issue, when they are the problem!

I'm disappointed, even with Liam who managed him at France and is not getting ahead of James in the mid.

Another start and down a goal. How many times will Pedro bail him out? Not always. I still yet to see the great minds of the board in getting rid of maresca for him.

Maybe it will improve with Penders? But he has also made some horrendous mistake like Jorgensen. So I agree it's a very challenging idea this. Heck even Valdez from Barcelona made so many mistakes but what saved him is amazing Messi and amazing mid in Busquet, Xavi and Iniesta. So even then it's still a very challenging idea to always play from the back.

Well I think is true we was doing good. But if not for defense which is something we been saying since Maresca time. So if the club cares about going the next level they need to focus on improving this. Which is obviously it won't happen with these owners and company. Its sad that out of all the interest we picked them to take over Roman.

Yes that sounds about right. But my question if that was the intent from the beginning why did they buy hard for Caicedo, Enzo and Lavia? Those deals don't make sense as to oppose the others we done.

Good stuff, really these guys that are running the club are dumb. I had thought they turn the corner last season with Maresca, but then they don't back him, and don't get the deals done. Sack him and get an even worse manager.

I'm assuming the reason we have not gotten a front shirt sponsor is because we are waiting to see what kind of punishment we get from Roman financial dealings. And when is that coming out?

Liam also has some experience about playing PSG since his stint at France, let's hope that helps today. 🤞

Awesome, he was good for that type of futbol they play.

Elliot for me is the one to get. But I agree unless we can get an upgrade I'm also against selling him. Because it's dumb as heck selling him and staying with injury prone players. So sell for silly money and if can get an upgrade. If not the board should not sell, but knowing them they will sell and get some 18 year old from Africa....

Yes that sounds weird, but the only reason with Gittens is because I want to see more, he merits one more season. With Santos I think I seen enough, he can be a good option for us, but if someone is offering silly money I don'd mind. And no at 40 million. But say 60 to 65 million that is not bad.

I don't mind selling him, but it will be dumb to sell him and stay with Lavia. We won't have any good cover in the mid.

I think it's obvious that Pedro will be the target since he has been in hot form, hence this is where Palmer needs to step up his game, as well if Estevao can be fit for this and help us that will be great. I really think the difference is going to be one of those two because Pedro is going to be marked like Crazy.

What happened to our charge?

The reason I'm willing to give time to Gittens is because he is young, Caicedo was very bad first season as well Cucu. I would wait for another season with Gittens to decide.

Yes I agree I think Neto is one we need to get rid of. I was wanting him gone last summer but he helped a lot, and he still does. But I just think that is his ceiling, and is best to get the best money we can while he still at that level. Also agree with Cucu he still is good and Hato still not sure. Hato might come good but is good to have the experience of Cucu in the team, as we need experience as well. Gittens I am willing to give more time time, agree on the rest.

Well so far still new manager bounce still on. If he help us eliminate PSG I will take back everything bad I said about him.

So is the new manager bounce over? I wonder how soon before his 6 years contract gets shreeded? Loony board.

Well that's what you get for getting rid of maresca and getting some one like Liam. Don't worry he got 6 years contract by the board .....