nadavTKL

Are there any reliable sources reporting this story?

The picture in your avatar, where is it from?

lol he said its a 2nd hugh deal, and his 1st was Sneijder to spurs... so i dont think so Maybe its Falcao to Chelsea! you could say its two clubs who "won the champions cup". or not.. never mind.

I cant see how someone could see so much potential in Romeu so he dont want us to get a very good DM. imo we also need someone who is better than Mikel (who is better than Romeu), so for me its a big yes for someone like Capoue. How is it? do you have a very good CM to pair with the DM (which i agreed we need)? you dont have one, you have two players who can contribute something in this role (Lampard, Ramires) but not as regulars, and you have another two who just might could do it in the future (Oscar, KDB as some have said- i dont know him enough) but right now dont have that in them and they are realy not use to play this role. So yes, i think we do need someone like Moutinho, but i dont think it will happen in January. What was Sturridge role in our team that he needs a replacement? was he a winger who sat on the bench? or maybe a striker who sat on the bench? This "replacement", aka Walcott, will come in to a team who as enough of replacements in the wingers/AM's department when 2 of Moses/Marin/Oscar gets to seat on the bench every game, and next season you can add KDB to that. And in the strikers department he'll train next to 2 strikers who are getting more minutes than him, as i assume we will get a real striker this January. all that when we still have Lukaku to come back, and probably a Falcao/Cavani to buy in the summer... what his role will be next season? and i even shouldnt have wrote this part about him being a striker, because Walcott doesnt have anything to do with the word "Striker" and he havent prove anything in this role in Arsenal.

I would realy like Sneijder in the Premier League. yeah it could potentially hurt us but i dont belive we are fighting head to head with spurs for something... players like him can only improve the league.

Please make it stop...!!... make it stoppp Theo Walcott? ffs, first we have more than enough wingers and AM's (+KDB), so why even talk about him? and second he's such a limited footballer, realy not in the level we want to be. He should join West ham or something...

The win is already ours which is very important, but we are not playing well for me. Passing and attacking generally was poor, but what annoyes me is the way we're defending... what about some freaking pressure on those limited Villa players? i hate how we are always seating back and waiting for the opponent to do something, thats just bad defending. We realy need a top class manager like Morinhou, Klop, someone to organize this and make the team look more compact, 'sophisticated' defensevly and decaplnyd. Benitez doesnt seem like a good modern tactican, dont know why we got him.

Did united deserevd a penalty? missed it.

So it's Falcao/Ba/Llorente?

Jovetic is not a proven goal scorer as a striker. but I agree with what you said about Pep-Falcao (as long as pep will want his new team to play like his old one). I actually can't see him coming here anymore, my bet is on Jose right now. Jose+Falcao in one summer.. can't get better than that.

What about Lucio? had hugh part in their season and a player Mourinho bought. He changed alot in their squad and game. And its not like we need 'rebuilding', we need few more players in, like he did with Real.

Daniel deserves to get playing time, we already saw he can contribute a lot in this level (with AVB), and im glad he'll get to play regulary now.. doesnt matter for me if its Liverpool, i wish him good luck!

He's back! im telling you is back.... I thought about it, and i dont think Jose will wait till City decides if Mancini is staying or not, and if is coming back to England he would want to come back to Chelsea. I think its us or PSG.

I thought you meant cut and shoot. how many times any striker stealing the ball and score? thats wierd to even say he doesnt do it, because its just not something that happens alot and something you should judge in a striker. Again, he is not just a poacher. When you give him the ball in the box he's finding his ways to shoot and score. imo his abilities to do it are better than Zlatan, Cavani and RVP. And its not called a poacher.

A lot. You dont realy know him and you havent seen him enough, thats what i think. He's not just a poacher who waits for crosses and through balls, thats realy ridiculous for me to read. Seems like you built a profile for him but it realy doesnt suits the reality. Everyone who saw him regulary for the past 3-4 seasons will tell you that Falcao is a phenomenon, give him the ball in the box/a bit outside the box/on counter, and there is a very good chance he will score or at least test the keeper. Making him a poacher like Inzhagi or Gomez is just so foolish.

Why you're annoyed? you prefer United to win the league over City? except the fact that i hate United, City winning the league means Mancini will stay there. Plus United winning it means alot of the level of the EPL, when a team with bad defense and midfield win the league. Thats horrible and wont happen in any other big league (Spain, Germany, Italy). City can at least look solid, even if they are not that good like we saw in the CL.

1. You rarly seen him creating his own goals? you havent seen him enough. 2. That sentence with Drogba playing LB at Camp Nou.... what? thats realy isnt something to think about when you're buying a striker. 3. Any decent striker would have won us the CWC, but thats it? winning CWC means something? we should have a striker who is good enough to win us the CL, the leauge, not just a striker who is "Better than Torres". Because Torres is so awful alot of you just want to change him for anyone, for January its ok, but in the longer term we should get someone in the highest level because thats the team we want to be.

im pretty sure Barcelona will sign Neymar.

Imo we need an exceptional striker, like one of the best, thats if you want to have one of the best teams and you're not satisfied with less. Main reason is that we dont have other big scorers in the starting line up. I dont know any striker with this profile that cost less than 35m euros. And i dont think Higuain is good enough for example.

I realy dont think so. Napoli said he will leave for more, dont remmember how much, and i think he have a release clause for around 50m euros.

You dont have an example of a game which United destroyed a team that plays like Bilbao played. How your opinion can be convincing?

There is a question about it. United are struggling against shity teams in PL this season, they would struggle against Bilbao of last season who can easily hart their weaknesses. You dont have any proof they would destory them because United arent good against this kind of football, i have proofs. I never said we have a good striker, what do you want....

its like you didnt read my post at all (and dont know enough about football). They wont merk Bilbao (of last season, Bilbao are pretty poor now). United havent improve anything but improve their attack force, so Bilbao would still play the better football and control the game. "Regardless, you can look at any formidable team in Europe and I guarantee you will find holes. What you won't find is a lack of finishers" maybe, but there are teams with much less "holes" than united. They shouldnt be an example, absolutely not.

But my point is there is a big difference between Barca and Real to United. United win games mostly because they have better attack than most oppositions in PL, Real and Barca (well Real arent that good all the time at this moment, but generaly they are) have a much better midfield, they control games, teams cant get comfortable against them, cant hold the ball too much because of their good pressure. Its a totally different level of football.

Omg you actually compared united to Real and Barca... read my post up there. Real and Barca have much better tactics and defend than United's.