nadavTKL

Sorry but its pretty ridicilous that you're saying stuff like that based on stats and what some site listed him. I dont know myself if those sites are wrong because i havent seen him enough, but im definitely wont judge him by stats. For now i will listen more to the guy who saw him every game, but anyway i'll watch him more from now and see myself.

Im fine with him as a backup, but the question is who's you starting CB's. If Terry can push for another season in top level so i wouldnt hurry to get a new CB, but if he cant i would buy a starting CB instead of Luiz/Cahill, because you wont keep 5 CB's in a team.

I heard his tackels arnet bad, from someone who watched every game of him this season. For me he seems like a potential for the pivot, question is if he can get the job right away or we should buy someone.

Central midfielders in our system? we obviously need to change our central midfield, i wouldnt be worried about it because right now we are playing Ramires more than anyone in that position, and it doesnt work. The only question for me (i havent seen de Bruyne too many times, this was the 3rd or 2nd time) is if de Bruyne can play simillar to players like Gundogan, Kross when he playes deeper, because he does remind me of them.

In the last period of the game he played deep actually. And i dont think started has a false 9, it seemed like he was the number 10.

I think thats why he stayed- because he CANT go anywhere. Not many clubs would pay his wages, i think the only option for him was PSG, and they said they arent interested. I kind a predict he'll sign after i read about PSG... very good news anyway, Bertrand doesnt seem ready imo.

Shit, i wanted us to sign him as a replacment for JT... a young leader, fast CB, cheap, would be perfect for us even in the summer instead of Cahill.

where? if its twitter give me the account please.

It seems you still dont realy want to explain your original post (i mean the part about Moyes, and why Laudrup and Benitez are better options than Simeone). But anyway- no, AVB tried to play his style from Porto, not what "Roman wanted", Roman probably brought him because he knew about his football philosophy and he thought thats what he wanted in Chelsea. Simeone plays tottaly different football in Atletico, kind a reminds Mourinho's philosophy. RDM proved (imo) in his days that he doesnt have a real good plan, he started by playing Ramires/Bertrand on the wing- which is pretty defensive, probably not what "Roman Wants"... and than saw it doesnt work and played the three of Hazard, Mata and Oscar. Our game most of the time looked very improvised, with no real plan. So, i dont think RDM did what Roman wanted, he just didnt know what to do to lift the team and get it together. I havent thought he needed to get sacked, but it seemd he wasnt a great tactican (but maybe he would have done better later if he stayed, idk).

ok, so not every manager who won EL would have sucsses here, i got this point i think, what more? you've explained nothing in this post.

Because thats what the media told you?

Moyes, a manager who plays this Pro-English game with Everton (playes Fellaini as a CAM... my god) is the best option and Simeone who makes Atletico play with such great pressure at opponents, and he's a proven tactican who also won EL+Super cup, and got them to 2nd place in La Liga so far, is the worst? thats science fiction for me. Have you realy seen Atletico in the last year? And its coming from a Brazilian which is even weirder... i would love to know what you like in Moyes and dont like in Simeone. Edit: oh right Simeone is Argentine

Why should i care about sport pages? the reasons for not wanting to come to manage Chelsea are clear to everyone, but until it will happen and Roman will not be able to find a new, promising/proved and desired manager like he did so far, i dont see a reason to panic. Its only January, did you expect we'll reveal a new manager by now? When a manager comes to Chelsea he also knows he's gonna get load of money and have a chance to prove himself in one of the best clubs in the world, those are two things that are hard to resist. Im sure that there are top managers that will never agree to come to Chelsea, but im sure there are some who will. what 2 slogans? you dont think those are our goals for now? To lose the CL spot theres got to be two teams that are better than us, i dont see how Spurs+ Arsenal/Everton are better. What im saying is that for now, we are in the best position, but i didnt say it will be easy.

Seb havent said that, right, but he did said: "If I have to pick between Mikel's passing range and Hazard (improving) poor positional sense, I know what facet I'll aim first", when he also said in the same post "Mikel has barely good options ahead of him", so it sounds like he thinks that the problem is more about the AM's positioning. I think its about the two behind them. Now like i said the solution need to come from the CM next to Mikel, but my point is that Mikel's passing skills are not something to defend in this particular subject (like Seb did), because he doesnt offer any kind of solution.

What do you mean by "not attracting too many players" and "Managers are not knocking on Roman´s door", it sounds like some nice slogans and not much more. The only thing that realy happend lately is that Pep chose Bayern. "Players"? dont know anything about that, maybe your talking about Taison and Aspas? I also dont think something got to happen soon, the club's goals for the next months are: 1. Get a CL spot. Something we're still favourits to get, with this squad too. 2. Sign a new-very good manager (Mourinho, Klopp, Simeone), probably need to happen until June. If we wont be able to get those two goals, than we're probably in deep troubles for me.

You realy think that the problem is with our AM's? what do you expect from Hazard? to come back and get the ball from MIkel? he's a winger. Its a fact that we dont have a CM/DM who can pick passes as good as other top teams have (teams who plays simillar type of football), a Playmaker, and Mikel realy isnt close to be good enough in that. its not only about passing range, its about timing, its about his speed of thought in picking passes, its funny to even think its good enough to "Lead" our central midfield. But the biggest problem for me is with the midfielder besides Mikel, the ball should be played through this player, and we dont have one who can do that.

How hard it was? United didnt have any brilliant central midfelders in the last two years, neither do Chelsea and Arsenal post Cesc, so it leaves Yaya Toure and Modric. And still, Spurs midfield with Parker-Modric wasnt that good, it was broken down easily when Parker doing crazy job at the back. Says somthing about Modric's workrate.

They are different players, and im saying exactly how they are different. I can suggest Moutinho is a better fit for us because i saw him alot, like i saw Modric. Moutinho plays for Porto, a team who met strong teams along the years in Europe and in Portugal, and plays for Portugal (National), and he faced very strong teams there as well. So your argument is weak. Modric havent played much in the CL and havent gone far for his Country. Premier League in the last few years is not always the highest level, especially not in the midfield game. Modric played against midfields who arent better than Moutinho played against, you can be sure about that.

If we're smart will go the other way arond and sign Capoue.

And for Real he wasnt good enough in this position (I think that, and most Real fans). So, Spurs or Real Madrid? i want to be in the level of Real if im honest. Modric isnt aggressive enough, not talking only about his physics but mainly about his approach off the ball. He is not like Moutinho who offer non stop pressure and firmness. He's just a bit soft. For that reason i think his best role is in a 4-3-3 formation. But even then, i dont think he's a player for the very top top teams (but thats just my feeling).

Well Hazard signed for us in the end so... But seriously, you shouldnt read too much into it, Falcao doesnt just say things like that, an interviewer asked him about going to PSG and Falcao have no reason to answer "PSG? no, i dont want to go there".

Yes Torres should never play, but our team has just bad mentality this season. Title afer title they lost this group of youngsters and/or irresponsible players, they are just not up for it. You can had to that the games vs Juve and Shaktar away when we didnt show anything, the game game vs QPR, the one against Liverpool when we should have scored 2 or 3 but instead we gave them the chance to score and they did. Its like the opposite of the end of last season. And this apathetic Benitez doesnt help at all. i cant watch anymore realy.

So im the only one who got enough of this season?

I got enough of this bucnh of irresponsible losers! just got enough of this! fuck them, simple as that.

Have you noticed that in the last few days we "closed deals" with 3 players? i would have been realy nervous and irritated if one of those players were in my "Chelsea Wishlist", but none of them is so i just hope at least 2 of those rumours are false.