Turkish Airlines rumoured to replace Samsung

[Polo7 3,496]

Turkish Airlines is a big company. Dont see the problem with this.

[Myself 793]

Yea, we need a top company. Apple, Samsung, or someone. Audi would look pretty bad ass.

I personally wouldn't like Apple, Facebook, Twitter, windows etc. just doesn't fit

[Liquidator 5,176]

Lidl anyone?

[AndersonBLUE 819]

If it was just the logo it would be alright

[BlueLyon 9,359]

It will never be logo alone...who the fuck knows what company that bird represents...and its all about making that brand popular.

Though my fav of those 4 is last one with name only.

Wouldnt mind delta airlines since they are already sponsors.

[Kezza 1,965]

What about Qantas? A jumping kangaroo would look great on our kit!

Was gonna say Jetstar, but they'll cancel the deal at the first sight of a bit of snow

[Blue Lion 5]

I wish we played 1 or 2 games a year without a sponsor.

[RoyalBlues 4,050]

Come to think of it, didn't we have a deal with Delta? Will that become conflicted or not?

[nyikolajevics 2,422]

Come to think of it, didn't we have a deal with Delta? Will that become conflicted or not?

The contract with Delta is going to expire in June 2014

http://www.chelseafc.com/the-club/sponsors/sponsors---partners/club/delta.html

"Chelsea Football Club announce Delta Air Lines as our new official global airline partner in June 2012."

"The two-year deal sees us link with one of the world's largest airlines, which flies 160 million passengers per year around 350 destinations in 65 countries."

[manpe 10,855]

I'd rather have the Chevy logo.

You would? The chevy logo is absolutely hideous. The 2nd or 4th option from that picture would be much better. Preferably the rightmost one, but with smaller text.

[Paul1970 250]

How do clubs get sponsors?

Does the club approach the company or does the company approach the club?

[gary gordon 1,777]

Was gonna say Jetstar, but they'll cancel the deal at the first sight of a bit of snow

Hahahaha too good. Worst airline!

[We Hate Scouse 10,260]

I wish we played 1 or 2 games a year without a sponsor.

Why?

[CHOULO19 24,332]

I understand how important it is to get a sponsor that is aesthetically acceptable on the kit and how that even affects kits sales, but eventually, whoever we get, we'll get used to the logo in the long run.

Honestly, if it gets us more money than City and utd, I'd be okay with us signing with bloody ISIS!

[Sidzeret 2,257]

You would? The chevy logo is absolutely hideous. The 2nd or 4th option from that picture would be much better. Preferably the rightmost one, but with smaller text.

After seeing a United kit in person, it doesn't look as ugly as in the pictures. ( similar to our new home kit).

I'd prefer a logo to two rows of letters filling up the shirt. That's just blund and tasteless.

Also I doubt they'll spend all that money just to put their unrecognizable bird logo in there. It'll probably be like the rightmost picture. Not for me.

But like Choulo's post above, we'll probably start to like it after a few weeks or months. No big deal.

[LAB 1,030]

Last chance this season to buy a decent kit. Who knows what awful red/yellow/green logo we're going to end up with next year?

[Sidzeret 2,257]

Why?

A football shirt is most charming without any shirt sponsor. I love the kits of the national teams.

[Muzchap 8,966]

I reckon the Mercedes logo would look pretty awesome or maybe Jaguar