zolayes 14,489 Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 can't see it giving the 75% needed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDN Blue 7,903 Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 BluesChronicle Dan Levene CPO directors, and Chelsea's Chairman and CEO, are back at the top table. CPO vote result expected shortly.1 minute ago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xPetrCechx 13,586 Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 So i don't understand. if the decision will be "NO" we still can move to a new stadium or not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave30 728 Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 The vote is officially NO Long live Stamford Bridge and the CPO :cfc: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDN Blue 7,903 Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 BluesChronicle Dan Levene CPO RESULT: CHELSEA BID TO BUY BACK STAMFORD BRIDGE FREEHOLD DEFEATED. #saynocpo59 seconds ago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xPetrCechx 13,586 Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 SO WHAT HAPPENED NOW??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
francozola 2,040 Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 SO WHAT HAPPENED NOW???Errrr they voted no. So the club has lost the vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave30 728 Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 they got 61.6 % 3569 votes for and 38.4 % 2227 votes against ( they needed 75% of the vote for a yes to the proposal ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xPetrCechx 13,586 Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 Errrr they voted no. So the club has lost the vote.LOL! i know this!!!i talked about the move. can he still happen? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
francozola 2,040 Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 Some sources are saying that 61% voted AGAINST the proposal - I.E. Sky and Telegraph twitters but it's actually 61% that voted FOR the proposal, isn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDN Blue 7,903 Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 This is silly imo.The longer cpo delay the less chance we have of moving in the 3mile radius. It's the fans that make the club, not the stadium.Some sources are saying that 61% voted AGAINST the proposal - I.E. Sky and Telegraph twitters but it's actually 61% that voted FOR the proposal, isn't it?Yeah, you're right.BluesChronicle Dan Levene Clarification on the actual CPO voting figures: for the resolution 3569 (61.6%); against the resolution 2227 (38.4%) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
francozola 2,040 Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 If so then that's probably a little closer than I thought it was going to be. If only the club would be a little more transparent - they would have no problems in getting 75%Edit: yup the tweets by Sky & Telegraph have disappeared. They realized their mistake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manpe 10,861 Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 So the majority voted yes... why is it 75%? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve5221 91 Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 LOL! i know this!!!i talked about the move. can he still happen?The move can still happen but it is going to require more detailed information from the club to the CPO for them to sell the shares.....In short the CPO hold the cards now, lets see what the club offer them....The fact is we need to move if we are going to compete longterm with the Manchester clubs.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xPetrCechx 13,586 Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 Ok... so we need to wait until the club will give more info to the CPO? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve5221 91 Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 If so then that's probably a little closer than I thought it was going to be. If only the club would be a little more transparent - they would have no problems in getting 75%Edit: yup the tweets by Sky & Telegraph have disappeared. They realized their mistake.Hopefully the club will go back with another proposal and get the extra 14% required..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve5221 91 Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 So what are the implications of the decision?It means that the club have been defeated this time around...they wil have to go back to the drawing board and make their plans more transparent to the CPO. I'm sure this will go through at some stage.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
francozola 2,040 Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 I'm sure they will - especially after witnessing this close a vote. Honestly, the way it was looking, I was expecting a 60-70% NO vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zolayes 14,489 Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 It means that the club have been defeated this time around...they wil have to go back to the drawing board and make their plans more transparent to the CPO. I'm sure this will go through at some stage....my thoughts too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve5221 91 Posted October 27, 2011 Share Posted October 27, 2011 I'm sure they will - especially after witnessing this close a vote. Honestly, the way it was looking, I was expecting a 60-70% NO vote.Yeah, the CPO have made thier point.....lets not be stupid now and kill it the move completely, as we all know it is required.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now