Jump to content

Stamford Bridge Thread


 Share

Recommended Posts

ohh...ok... so he bought 100 shares from people who agreed to sell them to him....

but still 100 from 15K + is nothing.

Exactly that.

And yes, that's true, but every vote will be important in this process. And at £100 each, that's £10,000 Buck's spent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually if we assume that a little over a third of cpo members (6000) take part in the vote either in person or by proxy and two thirds own one share per person and the final third own say 3 shares each then you would have a total of 10000 votes taking part, assuming all that bruce buck has 1% of the possible votes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The chairman told viewers he was sure the name Stamford Bridge would go with the club should it move, and that the club would listen to fans' recommendations that a new ground design should have one, big, single-tier 'home end' stand as seen at some other grounds across Europe.

'If it makes sense and makes the fans happy, of course we'd consider things like that.'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently the egm is now being held in the great hall in the west stand, the cpo have brought in the Electoral Reform Services to oversee the vote due to greater numbers now expected to turn up on the day, they are writing to all cpo shareholders and you need to email them to confirm your presence on the day.

If you are going make sure you have photo id on you ie: driving licence or passport, as no photo id means no admittance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OPEN LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS OF CPO

Recently, the club wrote to Chelsea Pitch Owners (CPO) asking the shareholders to allow the club to buy back the freehold land on which the Stamford Bridge stadium sits.

We believe there has been a lot of incorrect information spread through social media and otherwise regarding our proposal and we have tried to correct the misinformation through meetings with groups of shareholders, press briefings and information on the club website. We believe we have been transparent and all our fans should rest assured there are no hidden agendas.

Over the last few years, the club has made representations to the local authority regarding sites nearby. These representations are vital to ensure we protect our long-term position in relation to potential development sites in south-west London. It goes without saying that a move to another site in south or west London would be our first choice.

We emphasise that no decision to move has been made. But in order to give the club the option to move quickly, if the circumstances require, we need the ability to assure possible stadium development partners that we are permitted to leave Stamford Bridge and also able to use the development profits to help fund a new stadium. All development profits from Stamford Bridge would be used to partially fund a new stadium, and for no other purpose.

We also believe the protection Chelsea Pitch Owners gave the club in the 1990s is no longer necessary. CPO was formed when developers had their eye on this land, and there was a mortgage on the site.

The developers were looking for ways to push the club out against its will and redevelop the Stamford Bridge site which, at that time, was worth more than the club sitting on it.

Now the club is worth significantly more than the site. But Stamford Bridge is severely limited and we are unable to expand the stadium in a financially viable way. There is simply only so much you can fit on a site that is less than 12 acres.

We believe our proposal is a fair one. We know there is no one proposal that will please all fans. What we tried to do is meet most concerns and get the support of the CPO shareholders.

We can assure you we all want what is best for Chelsea FC and its fans. If we are not in a position to take up an option of a larger stadium sometime in the future, we will be faced with our matchday revenues continually dropping against those of our competitors.

Since Mr Abramovich bought the club in 2003, it has enjoyed the most successful period in its history. The owner and the Board want to build on that and we believe a vote in favour of the proposals is a vote for a continuation of that success.

Bruce Buck

Eugene Tenenbaum

Ron Gourlay

http://www.chelseafc.com/page/LatestNews/0,,10268~2487532,00.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You