Jump to content

The English Football Thread


Steve
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 67.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vesper

    10973

  • Laylabelle

    4887

  • Jase

    2657

  • Special Juan

    2619

6 hours ago, Laylabelle said:

2-0 Arsenal and back to top potentially until City play as even if Liverpool win the goal difference is 10

After our loss I couldn't care less what others do but so annoyed with City now and Pep smug face that I hope Pool or Arsenal win over him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, NikkiCFC said:

After our loss I couldn't care less what others do but so annoyed with City now and Pep smug face that I hope Pool or Arsenal win over him. 

Even if it's Pool or Arsenal as an alternative, City winning so many titles in a row is not a good advert for the Premier League.

And if that wasn't enough, stinking VAR is allowing them to get away with handball decisions. As if they needed more help.

 

Edited by Blue Armour
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

https://www.efl.com/news/2024/april/21/efl-statement--/

EFL Statement: Gateshead Football Club

Gateshead Football Club will not be permitted by the National League to participate in this season’s Play-Offs as the terms of the Club’s occupation at the Gateshead International Stadium, owned by the Borough Council of Gateshead, does not meet the relevant qualifying criteria to enable the Club to become a Member of the EFL.

 

All other Clubs permitted to play in the National League play-offs adhered to the requirements as set out in EFL Regulations.

 

Despite the League working with Gateshead throughout last season and again in recent months, the Club has been unable to attain security of tenure to play matches at its Stadium for a minimum of 10 seasons.

 

All National League Clubs are required to apply annually to the EFL should they wish to be eligible for promotion, which Gateshead did alongside other Clubs by the 30 November deadline. Working with the EFL, Clubs then had until 1 March to ensure that all the relevant criteria of EFL Regulations were met.

 

As Gateshead failed to meet the security of tenure requirement, the EFL rejected its application. The Club appealed the League's decision claiming that it was irrational or unreasonable, but that appeal has now been rejected after consideration by an independent Arbitrator.

Edited by KEVINAA
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You